Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars

Relics of holy people have been attractive among Muslims of all generations due to their mundane and spiritual importance. Sufi scholars are, especially, notable for their particular interest in relics, which form an integral part of their beliefs and practices. They venerate relics through which t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yusuph Dauda Gambari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LP2M Insuri Ponorogo 2024-01-01
Series:Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/adabiya/article/view/4182
_version_ 1827368440013258752
author Yusuph Dauda Gambari
author_facet Yusuph Dauda Gambari
author_sort Yusuph Dauda Gambari
collection DOAJ
description Relics of holy people have been attractive among Muslims of all generations due to their mundane and spiritual importance. Sufi scholars are, especially, notable for their particular interest in relics, which form an integral part of their beliefs and practices. They venerate relics through which they seek blessing (tabāruk) and intercession (tawāṣul), among others. Meanwhile, the modern Salafi scholars criticized the Sufis’ perspective on relics, claiming that their actions constitute bid’ah (innovation), kufr (infidelity), and syirk (associating partners with Allah). This paper, therefore, examined the modern Salafis’ criticism of the religious attitudes of the Sufis on relics. It adopted both historical and exegetical methods to achieve the set objectives. It has been discovered that relics have spiritual values, and Muslims of all generations, especially the companions (ṣahābah), have used them for different spiritual purposes. It is also clear that both the Salafis and Sufis venerate and seek blessing from the relics, though Sufis are more prominent in the practice. The paper identified excessiveness and arbitrariness in the disposition of the Sufis to the relics, which engendered deification of them as the yardstick for the Salafis’ criticisms. Therefore, it concluded that advocacy for the desecration of relics on the part of modern Salafi scholars lacks merits. Instead, machinery to checkmate arbitrariness should be advocated for. 
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:31:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1c06cca3d5c48b4af602f731e61daa0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1907-1191
2540-9204
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:31:30Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher LP2M Insuri Ponorogo
record_format Article
series Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan
spelling doaj.art-f1c06cca3d5c48b4af602f731e61daa02024-01-31T03:43:39ZengLP2M Insuri PonorogoAl-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan1907-11912540-92042024-01-0119110.37680/adabiya.v19i1.4182Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi ScholarsYusuph Dauda Gambari0University of Ilorin Relics of holy people have been attractive among Muslims of all generations due to their mundane and spiritual importance. Sufi scholars are, especially, notable for their particular interest in relics, which form an integral part of their beliefs and practices. They venerate relics through which they seek blessing (tabāruk) and intercession (tawāṣul), among others. Meanwhile, the modern Salafi scholars criticized the Sufis’ perspective on relics, claiming that their actions constitute bid’ah (innovation), kufr (infidelity), and syirk (associating partners with Allah). This paper, therefore, examined the modern Salafis’ criticism of the religious attitudes of the Sufis on relics. It adopted both historical and exegetical methods to achieve the set objectives. It has been discovered that relics have spiritual values, and Muslims of all generations, especially the companions (ṣahābah), have used them for different spiritual purposes. It is also clear that both the Salafis and Sufis venerate and seek blessing from the relics, though Sufis are more prominent in the practice. The paper identified excessiveness and arbitrariness in the disposition of the Sufis to the relics, which engendered deification of them as the yardstick for the Salafis’ criticisms. Therefore, it concluded that advocacy for the desecration of relics on the part of modern Salafi scholars lacks merits. Instead, machinery to checkmate arbitrariness should be advocated for.  https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/adabiya/article/view/4182ArbitrarinessDeificationRelicsSalafiSufi
spellingShingle Yusuph Dauda Gambari
Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars
Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan
Arbitrariness
Deification
Relics
Salafi
Sufi
title Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars
title_full Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars
title_fullStr Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars
title_full_unstemmed Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars
title_short Debating Holy Remains: a Discourse on Islamic Relics between the Sufi and Salafi Scholars
title_sort debating holy remains a discourse on islamic relics between the sufi and salafi scholars
topic Arbitrariness
Deification
Relics
Salafi
Sufi
url https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/adabiya/article/view/4182
work_keys_str_mv AT yusuphdaudagambari debatingholyremainsadiscourseonislamicrelicsbetweenthesufiandsalafischolars