Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution
Abstract Background The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and interchangeability between continuous cardiac output (CO) measured by electrical velocimetry (COEv) and continuous cardiac output obtained using the pulmonary thermodilution method (COPAC) during living donor liver transplan...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Anesthesiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0600-y |
_version_ | 1819148148304510976 |
---|---|
author | De-Jie Wang I-Shan Lee An-Hsun Chou Chun-Yu Chen Pei-Chi Ting Yun-Hui Teng Jr-Rung Lin Hsin-I Tsai |
author_facet | De-Jie Wang I-Shan Lee An-Hsun Chou Chun-Yu Chen Pei-Chi Ting Yun-Hui Teng Jr-Rung Lin Hsin-I Tsai |
author_sort | De-Jie Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and interchangeability between continuous cardiac output (CO) measured by electrical velocimetry (COEv) and continuous cardiac output obtained using the pulmonary thermodilution method (COPAC) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Method Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. CO was recorded by both two methods and compared at nine specific time points. The data were analyzed using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis for the percentage errors, and the concordance rate for trend analysis using a four-quadrant plot. Results In total, 207 paired datasets were recorded during LDLT. CO data were in the range of 2.8–12.7 L/min measured by PAC and 3.4–14.9 L/min derived from the EV machine. The correction coefficient between COPAC and COEv was 0.415 with p < 0.01. The 95% limitation agreement was − 5.9 to 3.4 L/min and the percentage error was 60%. The concordance rate was 56.5%. Conclusions The Aesculon™ monitor is not yet interchangeable with continuous thermodilution CO monitoring during LDLT. Trial registration The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation in Taiwan (registration number: 201600264B0). |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:41:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f1c92d3d32664d5e96916c39f1d8c58d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2253 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:41:06Z |
publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Anesthesiology |
spelling | doaj.art-f1c92d3d32664d5e96916c39f1d8c58d2022-12-21T18:23:55ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532018-10-011811810.1186/s12871-018-0600-yNon-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilutionDe-Jie Wang0I-Shan Lee1An-Hsun Chou2Chun-Yu Chen3Pei-Chi Ting4Yun-Hui Teng5Jr-Rung Lin6Hsin-I Tsai7Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung UniversityAbstract Background The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and interchangeability between continuous cardiac output (CO) measured by electrical velocimetry (COEv) and continuous cardiac output obtained using the pulmonary thermodilution method (COPAC) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Method Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. CO was recorded by both two methods and compared at nine specific time points. The data were analyzed using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis for the percentage errors, and the concordance rate for trend analysis using a four-quadrant plot. Results In total, 207 paired datasets were recorded during LDLT. CO data were in the range of 2.8–12.7 L/min measured by PAC and 3.4–14.9 L/min derived from the EV machine. The correction coefficient between COPAC and COEv was 0.415 with p < 0.01. The 95% limitation agreement was − 5.9 to 3.4 L/min and the percentage error was 60%. The concordance rate was 56.5%. Conclusions The Aesculon™ monitor is not yet interchangeable with continuous thermodilution CO monitoring during LDLT. Trial registration The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation in Taiwan (registration number: 201600264B0).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0600-yCardiac outputPulmonary thermodilutionElectrical velocimetryLiver transplantation |
spellingShingle | De-Jie Wang I-Shan Lee An-Hsun Chou Chun-Yu Chen Pei-Chi Ting Yun-Hui Teng Jr-Rung Lin Hsin-I Tsai Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution BMC Anesthesiology Cardiac output Pulmonary thermodilution Electrical velocimetry Liver transplantation |
title | Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution |
title_full | Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution |
title_short | Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution |
title_sort | non invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution |
topic | Cardiac output Pulmonary thermodilution Electrical velocimetry Liver transplantation |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-018-0600-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejiewang noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT ishanlee noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT anhsunchou noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT chunyuchen noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT peichiting noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT yunhuiteng noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT jrrunglin noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution AT hsinitsai noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementwithelectricalvelocimetryinpatientsundergoinglivertransplantationcomparisonofaninvasivemethodwithpulmonarythermodilution |