Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire

Abstract Fire is a critical driver of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum [Lindl.] Buchholz) regeneration. However, fire suppression combined with the effects of increased temperature and severe drought has resulted in fires of an intensity and size outside of the historical norm. As a result, r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David N. Soderberg, Adrian J. Das, Nathan L. Stephenson, Marc D. Meyer, Christy A. Brigham, Joshua Flickinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4789
_version_ 1797243124910653440
author David N. Soderberg
Adrian J. Das
Nathan L. Stephenson
Marc D. Meyer
Christy A. Brigham
Joshua Flickinger
author_facet David N. Soderberg
Adrian J. Das
Nathan L. Stephenson
Marc D. Meyer
Christy A. Brigham
Joshua Flickinger
author_sort David N. Soderberg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Fire is a critical driver of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum [Lindl.] Buchholz) regeneration. However, fire suppression combined with the effects of increased temperature and severe drought has resulted in fires of an intensity and size outside of the historical norm. As a result, recent mega‐fires have killed a significant portion of the world's sequoia population (13%–19%), and uncertainty surrounds whether severely affected groves will be able to recover naturally, potentially leading to a loss of grove area. To assess the likelihood of natural recovery, we collected spatially explicit data assessing mortality, crown condition, and regeneration within four giant sequoia groves that were severely impacted by the SQF‐ (2020) and KNP‐Complex (2021) wildfires within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. In total, we surveyed 5.9 ha for seedlings and assessed the crown condition of 1104 giant sequoias. To inform management, we used a statistical methodology that robustly quantifies the uncertainty in inherently “noisy” seedling data and takes advantage of readily available remote sensing metrics that would make our findings applicable to other recently burned groves. A loss of giant sequoia grove area would be a consequence of giant sequoia tree mortality followed by a failure of natural regeneration. We found that areas that experienced very high‐severity fire (above ~800 RdNBR) are at substantial risk for the loss of grove area, with tree mortality rapidly increasing and giant sequoia seedling density simultaneously decreasing with fire severity. Such high‐severity areas comprised 17.8, 142.0, 14.6, 1.6 ha and ~90%, ~14%, ~53%, and ~27% of Board Camp, Redwood Mountain, Suwanee, and New Oriole Lake groves, respectively. In all sampling areas, we found that seedling densities fell far below the average density measured after prescribed fires, where seedling numbers were almost certainly adequate to maintain giant sequoia populations and postfire conditions were more in keeping with historical norms. Importantly, spatial pattern is also important in assessing the risk of grove loss, and in two groves, Suwanee and New Oriole Lake, the high‐severity patches were not always contiguous, potentially making some areas more resilient to regeneration failure due to the proximity of surviving trees.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:50:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1ccf0e874b045ec890b44c4daefe9f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:50:08Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-f1ccf0e874b045ec890b44c4daefe9f22024-03-27T02:28:47ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252024-03-01153n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.4789Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfireDavid N. Soderberg0Adrian J. Das1Nathan L. Stephenson2Marc D. Meyer3Christy A. Brigham4Joshua Flickinger5U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station Three Rivers California USAU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station Three Rivers California USAU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station Three Rivers California USAUSDA Forest Service, Region 5 Ecology Program Southern Sierra Province Bishop California USASequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Division of Resources Management and Science Three Rivers California USASequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Division of Resources Management and Science Three Rivers California USAAbstract Fire is a critical driver of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum [Lindl.] Buchholz) regeneration. However, fire suppression combined with the effects of increased temperature and severe drought has resulted in fires of an intensity and size outside of the historical norm. As a result, recent mega‐fires have killed a significant portion of the world's sequoia population (13%–19%), and uncertainty surrounds whether severely affected groves will be able to recover naturally, potentially leading to a loss of grove area. To assess the likelihood of natural recovery, we collected spatially explicit data assessing mortality, crown condition, and regeneration within four giant sequoia groves that were severely impacted by the SQF‐ (2020) and KNP‐Complex (2021) wildfires within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. In total, we surveyed 5.9 ha for seedlings and assessed the crown condition of 1104 giant sequoias. To inform management, we used a statistical methodology that robustly quantifies the uncertainty in inherently “noisy” seedling data and takes advantage of readily available remote sensing metrics that would make our findings applicable to other recently burned groves. A loss of giant sequoia grove area would be a consequence of giant sequoia tree mortality followed by a failure of natural regeneration. We found that areas that experienced very high‐severity fire (above ~800 RdNBR) are at substantial risk for the loss of grove area, with tree mortality rapidly increasing and giant sequoia seedling density simultaneously decreasing with fire severity. Such high‐severity areas comprised 17.8, 142.0, 14.6, 1.6 ha and ~90%, ~14%, ~53%, and ~27% of Board Camp, Redwood Mountain, Suwanee, and New Oriole Lake groves, respectively. In all sampling areas, we found that seedling densities fell far below the average density measured after prescribed fires, where seedling numbers were almost certainly adequate to maintain giant sequoia populations and postfire conditions were more in keeping with historical norms. Importantly, spatial pattern is also important in assessing the risk of grove loss, and in two groves, Suwanee and New Oriole Lake, the high‐severity patches were not always contiguous, potentially making some areas more resilient to regeneration failure due to the proximity of surviving trees.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4789fire effectsgiant sequoiahigh‐severity wildfirenatural regenerationrestoration managementSequoiadendron giganteum
spellingShingle David N. Soderberg
Adrian J. Das
Nathan L. Stephenson
Marc D. Meyer
Christy A. Brigham
Joshua Flickinger
Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire
Ecosphere
fire effects
giant sequoia
high‐severity wildfire
natural regeneration
restoration management
Sequoiadendron giganteum
title Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire
title_full Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire
title_fullStr Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire
title_full_unstemmed Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire
title_short Assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high‐severity wildfire
title_sort assessing giant sequoia mortality and regeneration following high severity wildfire
topic fire effects
giant sequoia
high‐severity wildfire
natural regeneration
restoration management
Sequoiadendron giganteum
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4789
work_keys_str_mv AT davidnsoderberg assessinggiantsequoiamortalityandregenerationfollowinghighseveritywildfire
AT adrianjdas assessinggiantsequoiamortalityandregenerationfollowinghighseveritywildfire
AT nathanlstephenson assessinggiantsequoiamortalityandregenerationfollowinghighseveritywildfire
AT marcdmeyer assessinggiantsequoiamortalityandregenerationfollowinghighseveritywildfire
AT christyabrigham assessinggiantsequoiamortalityandregenerationfollowinghighseveritywildfire
AT joshuaflickinger assessinggiantsequoiamortalityandregenerationfollowinghighseveritywildfire