Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps

Background Due to few sufficient data regarding the comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of malignant colorectal polyps regarding outcomes and survival benefits, there are no clear guidelines of management strategies of malignant colorectal polyps. The aims of the present study were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amr Ibrahim, Loay M. Gertallah, Mahmoud Abdelaziz, Rehab Hemeda, Ahmed Fathy Gomaa, Mahmoud Ghoneme, Mahmoud Sherbeiny, Ahmed Lotfy Sharaf, Ola A. Harb, Mohamed Farouk Amin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Coloproctology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-1769922
_version_ 1827917964220825600
author Amr Ibrahim
Loay M. Gertallah
Mahmoud Abdelaziz
Rehab Hemeda
Ahmed Fathy Gomaa
Mahmoud Ghoneme
Mahmoud Sherbeiny
Ahmed Lotfy Sharaf
Ola A. Harb
Mohamed Farouk Amin
author_facet Amr Ibrahim
Loay M. Gertallah
Mahmoud Abdelaziz
Rehab Hemeda
Ahmed Fathy Gomaa
Mahmoud Ghoneme
Mahmoud Sherbeiny
Ahmed Lotfy Sharaf
Ola A. Harb
Mohamed Farouk Amin
author_sort Amr Ibrahim
collection DOAJ
description Background Due to few sufficient data regarding the comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of malignant colorectal polyps regarding outcomes and survival benefits, there are no clear guidelines of management strategies of malignant colorectal polyps. The aims of the present study were to compare endoscopic resection alone and surgical resection in patients with malignant polyps in the colon (T1N0M0) readings advantages, disadvantages, recurrence risks, survival benefits, and long-term prognosis to detect how management strategy affects outcome. Patients and methods we included 350 patients. All included patients were divided into 2 groups; the first group included 100 patients who underwent only endoscopic polypectomy and the second group included 250 patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomy followed by definitive surgical resection after histopathological diagnosis. We followed all patients for about 5 years, ranging from 18 to 55 months. The primarily evaluated parameters are surgical consequences and patients' morbidity. The secondary evaluated parameters are recurrence risks, recurrence free survival, and overall survival rates. Results The age of patients who underwent polypectomy is usually younger than the surgical group, males have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with females. Patients with tumors in the left colon have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with the right colon (p < 0.0001). Tumor factors associated with more liability to surgical resection are presence of lymphovascular invasion, high grade, and poor tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001). The management strategy was the most significant predictor of overall and recurrence free survival rates in patients with malignant colon polyps (p < 0.001). Conclusions We found that survival benefits and lower incidence of recurrence are detected in the surgical resection group more than in the polypectomy group.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:35:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1d41a9ac2f1494a99a38173e7560dad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2237-9363
2317-6423
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:35:58Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format Article
series Journal of Coloproctology
spelling doaj.art-f1d41a9ac2f1494a99a38173e7560dad2023-06-23T22:50:27ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Journal of Coloproctology2237-93632317-64232023-06-01430212613210.1055/s-0043-1769922Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon PolypsAmr Ibrahim0Loay M. Gertallah1Mahmoud Abdelaziz2Rehab Hemeda3Ahmed Fathy Gomaa4Mahmoud Ghoneme5Mahmoud Sherbeiny6Ahmed Lotfy Sharaf7Ola A. Harb8Mohamed Farouk Amin9Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansura University, Mansoura, EgyptDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology and Infectious Diseases Faculty of Medicine, Alazhar University, Cairo, EgyptDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptBackground Due to few sufficient data regarding the comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of malignant colorectal polyps regarding outcomes and survival benefits, there are no clear guidelines of management strategies of malignant colorectal polyps. The aims of the present study were to compare endoscopic resection alone and surgical resection in patients with malignant polyps in the colon (T1N0M0) readings advantages, disadvantages, recurrence risks, survival benefits, and long-term prognosis to detect how management strategy affects outcome. Patients and methods we included 350 patients. All included patients were divided into 2 groups; the first group included 100 patients who underwent only endoscopic polypectomy and the second group included 250 patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomy followed by definitive surgical resection after histopathological diagnosis. We followed all patients for about 5 years, ranging from 18 to 55 months. The primarily evaluated parameters are surgical consequences and patients' morbidity. The secondary evaluated parameters are recurrence risks, recurrence free survival, and overall survival rates. Results The age of patients who underwent polypectomy is usually younger than the surgical group, males have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with females. Patients with tumors in the left colon have more liability to polypectomy in comparison with the right colon (p < 0.0001). Tumor factors associated with more liability to surgical resection are presence of lymphovascular invasion, high grade, and poor tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001). The management strategy was the most significant predictor of overall and recurrence free survival rates in patients with malignant colon polyps (p < 0.001). Conclusions We found that survival benefits and lower incidence of recurrence are detected in the surgical resection group more than in the polypectomy group.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-1769922malignant colon polypssurgical resectionpolypectomysurvival
spellingShingle Amr Ibrahim
Loay M. Gertallah
Mahmoud Abdelaziz
Rehab Hemeda
Ahmed Fathy Gomaa
Mahmoud Ghoneme
Mahmoud Sherbeiny
Ahmed Lotfy Sharaf
Ola A. Harb
Mohamed Farouk Amin
Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps
Journal of Coloproctology
malignant colon polyps
surgical resection
polypectomy
survival
title Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps
title_full Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps
title_fullStr Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps
title_short Prognostic Roles and Survival Benefits of Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection in the Management of Malignant Colon Polyps
title_sort prognostic roles and survival benefits of endoscopic resection versus surgical resection in the management of malignant colon polyps
topic malignant colon polyps
surgical resection
polypectomy
survival
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-1769922
work_keys_str_mv AT amribrahim prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT loaymgertallah prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT mahmoudabdelaziz prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT rehabhemeda prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT ahmedfathygomaa prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT mahmoudghoneme prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT mahmoudsherbeiny prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT ahmedlotfysharaf prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT olaaharb prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps
AT mohamedfaroukamin prognosticrolesandsurvivalbenefitsofendoscopicresectionversussurgicalresectioninthemanagementofmalignantcolonpolyps