Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?

Background: Physician educators directing medical student programs face increasingly more complex challenges to ensure students receive appropriate preparation to care for patients. The Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE) defined expectations of and for clerkship directors in 2003. Since then, muc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gary L. Beck Dallaghan, Cynthia H. Ledford, Douglas Ander, John Spollen, Sherilyn Smith, Scott Graziano, Susan M. Cox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1714201
_version_ 1818749768672739328
author Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
Cynthia H. Ledford
Douglas Ander
John Spollen
Sherilyn Smith
Scott Graziano
Susan M. Cox
author_facet Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
Cynthia H. Ledford
Douglas Ander
John Spollen
Sherilyn Smith
Scott Graziano
Susan M. Cox
author_sort Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
collection DOAJ
description Background: Physician educators directing medical student programs face increasingly more complex challenges to ensure students receive appropriate preparation to care for patients. The Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE) defined expectations of and for clerkship directors in 2003. Since then, much has changed in medical education and health care. Methods: ACE conducted a panel discussion at the 2016 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead conference, soliciting input on these expectations and the changing roles of clerkship directors. Using workshops as a cross-sectional study design, participants reacted to roles and responsibilities of clerkship directors identified in the literature using an audience response system and completing worksheets. Results: The participants represented different disciplines of medicine and ranged from clerkship directors to deans of curriculum. Essential clerkship director qualifications identified by participants included: enthusiasm, experience teaching, and clinical expertise. Essential tasks included grading and assessment and attention to accreditation standards. Participants felt clerkship directors need adequate resources, including budget oversight, full-time clerkship support, and dedicated time to be the clerkship director. To whom clerkship directors report was mixed. Clerkship directors look to their chair for career advice, and they also report to the dean to ensure educational standards are being met. Expectations to meet accreditation standards and provide exemplary educational experiences can be difficult to achieve if clerkship directors’ time and resources are limited. Conclusions: Participant responses indicated the need for a strong partnership between department chairs and the dean’s office so that clerkship directors can fulfill their responsibilities. Our results indicate a need to ensure clerkship directors have the time and resources necessary to manage clinical medical student education in an increasingly complex health care environment. Further studies need to be conducted to obtain more precise data on the true amount of time they are given to do that role.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T04:09:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1e12d9ec94f43629095bbfcd680d3a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1087-2981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T04:09:02Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Medical Education Online
spelling doaj.art-f1e12d9ec94f43629095bbfcd680d3a62022-12-21T21:21:31ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812020-01-0125110.1080/10872981.2020.17142011714201Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?Gary L. Beck Dallaghan0Cynthia H. Ledford1Douglas Ander2John Spollen3Sherilyn Smith4Scott Graziano5Susan M. Cox6University of North Carolina School of MedicineOakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineEmory University School of MedicineUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Washington School of MedicineLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of MedicineDell Medical School-The University of Texas at AustinBackground: Physician educators directing medical student programs face increasingly more complex challenges to ensure students receive appropriate preparation to care for patients. The Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE) defined expectations of and for clerkship directors in 2003. Since then, much has changed in medical education and health care. Methods: ACE conducted a panel discussion at the 2016 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead conference, soliciting input on these expectations and the changing roles of clerkship directors. Using workshops as a cross-sectional study design, participants reacted to roles and responsibilities of clerkship directors identified in the literature using an audience response system and completing worksheets. Results: The participants represented different disciplines of medicine and ranged from clerkship directors to deans of curriculum. Essential clerkship director qualifications identified by participants included: enthusiasm, experience teaching, and clinical expertise. Essential tasks included grading and assessment and attention to accreditation standards. Participants felt clerkship directors need adequate resources, including budget oversight, full-time clerkship support, and dedicated time to be the clerkship director. To whom clerkship directors report was mixed. Clerkship directors look to their chair for career advice, and they also report to the dean to ensure educational standards are being met. Expectations to meet accreditation standards and provide exemplary educational experiences can be difficult to achieve if clerkship directors’ time and resources are limited. Conclusions: Participant responses indicated the need for a strong partnership between department chairs and the dean’s office so that clerkship directors can fulfill their responsibilities. Our results indicate a need to ensure clerkship directors have the time and resources necessary to manage clinical medical student education in an increasingly complex health care environment. Further studies need to be conducted to obtain more precise data on the true amount of time they are given to do that role.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1714201medical studentsmedical educationaccreditationclinical clerkshipfaculty
spellingShingle Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
Cynthia H. Ledford
Douglas Ander
John Spollen
Sherilyn Smith
Scott Graziano
Susan M. Cox
Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?
Medical Education Online
medical students
medical education
accreditation
clinical clerkship
faculty
title Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?
title_full Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?
title_fullStr Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?
title_full_unstemmed Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?
title_short Evolving roles of clerkship directors: have expectations changed?
title_sort evolving roles of clerkship directors have expectations changed
topic medical students
medical education
accreditation
clinical clerkship
faculty
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1714201
work_keys_str_mv AT garylbeckdallaghan evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged
AT cynthiahledford evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged
AT douglasander evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged
AT johnspollen evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged
AT sherilynsmith evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged
AT scottgraziano evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged
AT susanmcox evolvingrolesofclerkshipdirectorshaveexpectationschanged