An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy
A compromise approach between aerodynamic performance and structural robustness is presented. The modeling of horizontal axis wind turbine blade GE1.5-XLE is studied regarding the applicability of three different solution methods computational fluid dynamics (CFD), one – way (unidirectional), and tw...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Alexandria Engineering Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016822005713 |
_version_ | 1828071472339353600 |
---|---|
author | Yassen El.S. Yassen Ahmed S. Abdelhameed Kamel A. Elshorbagy |
author_facet | Yassen El.S. Yassen Ahmed S. Abdelhameed Kamel A. Elshorbagy |
author_sort | Yassen El.S. Yassen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A compromise approach between aerodynamic performance and structural robustness is presented. The modeling of horizontal axis wind turbine blade GE1.5-XLE is studied regarding the applicability of three different solution methods computational fluid dynamics (CFD), one – way (unidirectional), and two – way (bidirectional) coupling fluid – structure interaction (FSI) at a shedding frequency of the vortex far from the natural frequency. The predicted results showed significant differences between the unidirectional coupling solution and experimental data. While, the bidirectional coupling method proposed accurate FSI and gave results closer to the experimental measurements than unidirectional simulation results. The bidirectional coupled approach appears to be more stable and accurate, where a large number of time steps should be used for uncoupled method to achieve the same level of precision. For the present case involving large blade strain, the difference between the prediction of rigid blade solution using CFD and FSI model increases considerably. However, it is concluded that for large blade strains, the FSI model is closer shown to be more adequate for accurate representation of the turbine performance. Moreover, when optimization is a key aspect, bidirectional simulations should be performed regardless of the higher computational cost. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T00:54:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f1e366520a6f43d2a9871e1e530b22bc |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1110-0168 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T00:54:59Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Alexandria Engineering Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-f1e366520a6f43d2a9871e1e530b22bc2023-01-05T06:46:09ZengElsevierAlexandria Engineering Journal1110-01682023-02-0164111An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategyYassen El.S. Yassen0Ahmed S. Abdelhameed1Kamel A. Elshorbagy2Department of Mechanical Power Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt; Corresponding author.Department of Mechanical Power Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said, EgyptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptA compromise approach between aerodynamic performance and structural robustness is presented. The modeling of horizontal axis wind turbine blade GE1.5-XLE is studied regarding the applicability of three different solution methods computational fluid dynamics (CFD), one – way (unidirectional), and two – way (bidirectional) coupling fluid – structure interaction (FSI) at a shedding frequency of the vortex far from the natural frequency. The predicted results showed significant differences between the unidirectional coupling solution and experimental data. While, the bidirectional coupling method proposed accurate FSI and gave results closer to the experimental measurements than unidirectional simulation results. The bidirectional coupled approach appears to be more stable and accurate, where a large number of time steps should be used for uncoupled method to achieve the same level of precision. For the present case involving large blade strain, the difference between the prediction of rigid blade solution using CFD and FSI model increases considerably. However, it is concluded that for large blade strains, the FSI model is closer shown to be more adequate for accurate representation of the turbine performance. Moreover, when optimization is a key aspect, bidirectional simulations should be performed regardless of the higher computational cost.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016822005713Wind turbine bladeFluid-Structure Interaction (FSI)Unidirectional and bidirectional coupling FSICFDGE1.5-XLE blade |
spellingShingle | Yassen El.S. Yassen Ahmed S. Abdelhameed Kamel A. Elshorbagy An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy Alexandria Engineering Journal Wind turbine blade Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) Unidirectional and bidirectional coupling FSI CFD GE1.5-XLE blade |
title | An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy |
title_full | An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy |
title_fullStr | An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy |
title_short | An examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid-structure interaction strategy |
title_sort | examination of hub wind turbine utilizing fluid structure interaction strategy |
topic | Wind turbine blade Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) Unidirectional and bidirectional coupling FSI CFD GE1.5-XLE blade |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016822005713 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yassenelsyassen anexaminationofhubwindturbineutilizingfluidstructureinteractionstrategy AT ahmedsabdelhameed anexaminationofhubwindturbineutilizingfluidstructureinteractionstrategy AT kamelaelshorbagy anexaminationofhubwindturbineutilizingfluidstructureinteractionstrategy AT yassenelsyassen examinationofhubwindturbineutilizingfluidstructureinteractionstrategy AT ahmedsabdelhameed examinationofhubwindturbineutilizingfluidstructureinteractionstrategy AT kamelaelshorbagy examinationofhubwindturbineutilizingfluidstructureinteractionstrategy |