Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia

The paper presents the first analysis of crowdsourcing data of all observations of fungi (including lichens) and myxomycetes in Northwestern Siberia uploaded to iNaturalist.org to date (24.02.2022). The Introduction presents an analysis of fungal diversity crowdsourcing globally, in Russia, and in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina V. Filippova, Dmitry V. Ageev, Yuriy M. Basov, Viktoria V. Bilous, Dmitry A. Bochkov, Sergey Yu. Bolshakov, Galina N. Bushmakova, Elena A. Butunina, Evgeny A. Davydov, Alexandra Yu. Esengeldenova, Ilya V. Filippov, Alexandra V. Filippova, Sergei V. Gerasimov, Lyudmila B. Kalinina, Juha Kinnunen, Alexander A. Korepanov, Natalia N. Korotkikh, Igor V. Kuzmin, Sergey V. Kvashnin, Alexandra I. Mingalimova, Nikolay V. Nakonechnyi, Ruslan N. Nurkhanov, Evgeniy S. Popov, Kim O. Potapov, Yury A. Rebriev, Anton S. Rezvyi, Sofia R. Romanova, Tatiana L. Strus, Carl Sundström, Tatiana Yu. Svetasheva, Massimo Tabone, Svetlana G. Tsarakhova, Alexandra L. Vasina, Anastasia V. Vlasenko, Vyacheslav A. Vlasenko, Lidia S. Yakovchenko, Alexander A. Yakovlev, Elena A. Zvyagina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fund for Support and Development of Protected Areas "Bear Land" 2022-05-01
Series:Nature Conservation Research: Заповедная наука
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ncr-journal.bear-land.org/article/378
_version_ 1797952737470578688
author Nina V. Filippova
Dmitry V. Ageev
Yuriy M. Basov
Viktoria V. Bilous
Dmitry A. Bochkov
Sergey Yu. Bolshakov
Galina N. Bushmakova
Elena A. Butunina
Evgeny A. Davydov
Alexandra Yu. Esengeldenova
Ilya V. Filippov
Alexandra V. Filippova
Sergei V. Gerasimov
Lyudmila B. Kalinina
Juha Kinnunen
Alexander A. Korepanov
Natalia N. Korotkikh
Igor V. Kuzmin
Sergey V. Kvashnin
Alexandra I. Mingalimova
Nikolay V. Nakonechnyi
Ruslan N. Nurkhanov
Evgeniy S. Popov
Kim O. Potapov
Yury A. Rebriev
Anton S. Rezvyi
Sofia R. Romanova
Tatiana L. Strus
Carl Sundström
Tatiana Yu. Svetasheva
Massimo Tabone
Svetlana G. Tsarakhova
Alexandra L. Vasina
Anastasia V. Vlasenko
Vyacheslav A. Vlasenko
Lidia S. Yakovchenko
Alexander A. Yakovlev
Elena A. Zvyagina
author_facet Nina V. Filippova
Dmitry V. Ageev
Yuriy M. Basov
Viktoria V. Bilous
Dmitry A. Bochkov
Sergey Yu. Bolshakov
Galina N. Bushmakova
Elena A. Butunina
Evgeny A. Davydov
Alexandra Yu. Esengeldenova
Ilya V. Filippov
Alexandra V. Filippova
Sergei V. Gerasimov
Lyudmila B. Kalinina
Juha Kinnunen
Alexander A. Korepanov
Natalia N. Korotkikh
Igor V. Kuzmin
Sergey V. Kvashnin
Alexandra I. Mingalimova
Nikolay V. Nakonechnyi
Ruslan N. Nurkhanov
Evgeniy S. Popov
Kim O. Potapov
Yury A. Rebriev
Anton S. Rezvyi
Sofia R. Romanova
Tatiana L. Strus
Carl Sundström
Tatiana Yu. Svetasheva
Massimo Tabone
Svetlana G. Tsarakhova
Alexandra L. Vasina
Anastasia V. Vlasenko
Vyacheslav A. Vlasenko
Lidia S. Yakovchenko
Alexander A. Yakovlev
Elena A. Zvyagina
author_sort Nina V. Filippova
collection DOAJ
description The paper presents the first analysis of crowdsourcing data of all observations of fungi (including lichens) and myxomycetes in Northwestern Siberia uploaded to iNaturalist.org to date (24.02.2022). The Introduction presents an analysis of fungal diversity crowdsourcing globally, in Russia, and in the region of interest. Materials and methods describe the protocol of uploading data to iNaturalist.org, the structure of the crowdsourcing community, initiative to revise the accumulated data, procedures of data analysis, and compilation of a dataset of revised crowdsourced data. The Results present the analysis of accumulated data by several parameters: temporal, geographical and taxonomical scope, observation and identification efforts, identifiability of various taxa, species novelty and Red Data Book categories and the protection status of registered observations. The Discussion provides data on usability of crowdsourcing data for biodiversity research and conservation of fungi, including pros and contras. The Electronic Supplements to the paper include an annotated checklist of observations of protected species with information on Red Data Book categories and the protection status, and an annotated checklist of regional records of new taxa. The paper is supplemented with a dataset of about 15 000 revised and annotated records available through Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). The tradition of crowdsourcing is rooted in mycological societies around the world, including Russia. In Northwestern Siberia, a regional mycological club was established in 2018, encouraging its members to contribute observations of fungi on iNaturalist.org. A total of about 15 000 observations of fungi and myxomycetes were uploaded so far, by about 200 observers, from three administrative regions (Yamalo-Nenetsky Autonomous Okrug, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, and Tyumen Region). The geographical coverage of crowdsourcing observations remains low. However, the observation activity has increased in the last four years. The goal of this study consisted of a collaborative effort of professional mycologists invited to help with the identification of these observations and analysis of the accumulated data. As a result, all observations were reviewed by at least one expert. About half of all the observations have been identified reliably to the species level and received Research Grade status. Of those, 90 species (195 records) represented records of taxa new to their respective regions; 876 records of 53 species of protected species provide important data for conservation programmes. The other half of the observations consists of records still under-identified for various reasons: poor quality photographs, complex taxa (impossible to identify without microscopic or molecular study), or lack of experts in a particular taxonomic group. The Discussion section summarises the pros and cons of the use of crowdsourcing for the study and conservation of regional fungal diversity, and summarises the dispute on this subject among mycologists. Further research initiatives involving crowdsourcing data must focus on an increase in the quality of observations and strive to introduce the habit of collecting voucher specimens among the community of amateurs. The timely feedback from experts is also important to provide quality and the increase of personal involvement.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:52:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1f0e47cd7014f10b92581f1978d6d9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2500-008X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:52:06Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Fund for Support and Development of Protected Areas "Bear Land"
record_format Article
series Nature Conservation Research: Заповедная наука
spelling doaj.art-f1f0e47cd7014f10b92581f1978d6d9e2023-01-15T06:09:25ZengFund for Support and Development of Protected Areas "Bear Land"Nature Conservation Research: Заповедная наука2500-008X2022-05-017Suppl.1647810.24189/ncr.2022.023Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern SiberiaNina V. Filippova0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9506-0991Dmitry V. Ageev1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-1908Yuriy M. Basov2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-3001Viktoria V. Bilous3Dmitry A. Bochkov4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-8389Sergey Yu. Bolshakov5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6208-7792Galina N. Bushmakova6Elena A. Butunina7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1803-2962Evgeny A. Davydov8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-8506Alexandra Yu. Esengeldenova9Ilya V. Filippov10https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-553XAlexandra V. Filippova11https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2117-1258Sergei V. Gerasimov12Lyudmila B. Kalinina13https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7809-8891Juha Kinnunen14Alexander A. Korepanov15Natalia N. Korotkikh16https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-2979Igor V. Kuzmin17https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6824-4015Sergey V. Kvashnin18Alexandra I. Mingalimova19Nikolay V. Nakonechnyi20https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-5667Ruslan N. Nurkhanov21https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2338-6455Evgeniy S. Popov22https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-3117Kim O. Potapov23https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5103-1021Yury A. Rebriev24https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-8593Anton S. Rezvyi25https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4694-0861Sofia R. Romanova26Tatiana L. Strus27https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-5558Carl Sundström28Tatiana Yu. Svetasheva29https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8968-9518Massimo Tabone30Svetlana G. Tsarakhova31Alexandra L. Vasina32Anastasia V. Vlasenko33https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-4482Vyacheslav A. Vlasenko34https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-0041Lidia S. Yakovchenko35https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-7771Alexander A. Yakovlev36https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-4047Elena A. Zvyagina37https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2063-4847Yugra State UniversityLLC «SIGNATEC»LLC «IPIGAZ-SEVER»Kinder Garden No18 «Ulybka» in the Khanty-Mansiysk townLomonosov Moscow State UniversityYugra State University; Komarov Botanical Institute of RASMalaya Sosva State Nature ReserveKondinskie Ozera Natural ParkCentral Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of RAS; Altai State UniversityKondinskie Ozera Natural ParkYugra State UniversityKemerovo State UniversityBashkirian Republican Children’ Ecological and Biological CenterKomarov Botanical Institute of RAS; Polistovsky State Nature ReserveUniversity of HelsinkiIndependent ResearcherKondinskie Ozera Natural ParkTyumen State UniversityLLC «GEO-VEKTOR»Yugra State UniversitySurgut State UniversityIndependent ResearcherKomarov Botanical Institute of RASKazan Federal UniversitySouthern Scientific Center of RASMuseum of Nature and Man in the Khanty-Mansiysk townIndependent ResearcherIndependent ResearcherINTERACT International Network for Terrestrial Research and Monitoring in the ArcticTula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical UniversityMuseum of Natural History of the MediterraneanIndependent ResearcherMalaya Sosva State Nature ReserveCentral Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of RASCentral Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of RASCentral Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of RASIndependent ResearcherYugra State University; Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityThe paper presents the first analysis of crowdsourcing data of all observations of fungi (including lichens) and myxomycetes in Northwestern Siberia uploaded to iNaturalist.org to date (24.02.2022). The Introduction presents an analysis of fungal diversity crowdsourcing globally, in Russia, and in the region of interest. Materials and methods describe the protocol of uploading data to iNaturalist.org, the structure of the crowdsourcing community, initiative to revise the accumulated data, procedures of data analysis, and compilation of a dataset of revised crowdsourced data. The Results present the analysis of accumulated data by several parameters: temporal, geographical and taxonomical scope, observation and identification efforts, identifiability of various taxa, species novelty and Red Data Book categories and the protection status of registered observations. The Discussion provides data on usability of crowdsourcing data for biodiversity research and conservation of fungi, including pros and contras. The Electronic Supplements to the paper include an annotated checklist of observations of protected species with information on Red Data Book categories and the protection status, and an annotated checklist of regional records of new taxa. The paper is supplemented with a dataset of about 15 000 revised and annotated records available through Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). The tradition of crowdsourcing is rooted in mycological societies around the world, including Russia. In Northwestern Siberia, a regional mycological club was established in 2018, encouraging its members to contribute observations of fungi on iNaturalist.org. A total of about 15 000 observations of fungi and myxomycetes were uploaded so far, by about 200 observers, from three administrative regions (Yamalo-Nenetsky Autonomous Okrug, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, and Tyumen Region). The geographical coverage of crowdsourcing observations remains low. However, the observation activity has increased in the last four years. The goal of this study consisted of a collaborative effort of professional mycologists invited to help with the identification of these observations and analysis of the accumulated data. As a result, all observations were reviewed by at least one expert. About half of all the observations have been identified reliably to the species level and received Research Grade status. Of those, 90 species (195 records) represented records of taxa new to their respective regions; 876 records of 53 species of protected species provide important data for conservation programmes. The other half of the observations consists of records still under-identified for various reasons: poor quality photographs, complex taxa (impossible to identify without microscopic or molecular study), or lack of experts in a particular taxonomic group. The Discussion section summarises the pros and cons of the use of crowdsourcing for the study and conservation of regional fungal diversity, and summarises the dispute on this subject among mycologists. Further research initiatives involving crowdsourcing data must focus on an increase in the quality of observations and strive to introduce the habit of collecting voucher specimens among the community of amateurs. The timely feedback from experts is also important to provide quality and the increase of personal involvement.http://ncr-journal.bear-land.org/article/378biodiversity data mobilisationcitizen sciencefungal conservationfungihuman observationlichensmycological societynew recordprotected speciesred data book
spellingShingle Nina V. Filippova
Dmitry V. Ageev
Yuriy M. Basov
Viktoria V. Bilous
Dmitry A. Bochkov
Sergey Yu. Bolshakov
Galina N. Bushmakova
Elena A. Butunina
Evgeny A. Davydov
Alexandra Yu. Esengeldenova
Ilya V. Filippov
Alexandra V. Filippova
Sergei V. Gerasimov
Lyudmila B. Kalinina
Juha Kinnunen
Alexander A. Korepanov
Natalia N. Korotkikh
Igor V. Kuzmin
Sergey V. Kvashnin
Alexandra I. Mingalimova
Nikolay V. Nakonechnyi
Ruslan N. Nurkhanov
Evgeniy S. Popov
Kim O. Potapov
Yury A. Rebriev
Anton S. Rezvyi
Sofia R. Romanova
Tatiana L. Strus
Carl Sundström
Tatiana Yu. Svetasheva
Massimo Tabone
Svetlana G. Tsarakhova
Alexandra L. Vasina
Anastasia V. Vlasenko
Vyacheslav A. Vlasenko
Lidia S. Yakovchenko
Alexander A. Yakovlev
Elena A. Zvyagina
Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia
Nature Conservation Research: Заповедная наука
biodiversity data mobilisation
citizen science
fungal conservation
fungi
human observation
lichens
mycological society
new record
protected species
red data book
title Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia
title_full Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia
title_fullStr Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia
title_full_unstemmed Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia
title_short Crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity: revision of iNaturalist observations in Northwestern Siberia
title_sort crowdsourcing fungal biodiversity revision of inaturalist observations in northwestern siberia
topic biodiversity data mobilisation
citizen science
fungal conservation
fungi
human observation
lichens
mycological society
new record
protected species
red data book
url http://ncr-journal.bear-land.org/article/378
work_keys_str_mv AT ninavfilippova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT dmitryvageev crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT yuriymbasov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT viktoriavbilous crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT dmitryabochkov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT sergeyyubolshakov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT galinanbushmakova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT elenaabutunina crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT evgenyadavydov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT alexandrayuesengeldenova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT ilyavfilippov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT alexandravfilippova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT sergeivgerasimov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT lyudmilabkalinina crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT juhakinnunen crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT alexanderakorepanov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT nataliankorotkikh crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT igorvkuzmin crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT sergeyvkvashnin crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT alexandraimingalimova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT nikolayvnakonechnyi crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT ruslannnurkhanov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT evgeniyspopov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT kimopotapov crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT yuryarebriev crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT antonsrezvyi crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT sofiarromanova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT tatianalstrus crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT carlsundstrom crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT tatianayusvetasheva crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT massimotabone crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT svetlanagtsarakhova crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT alexandralvasina crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT anastasiavvlasenko crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT vyacheslavavlasenko crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT lidiasyakovchenko crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT alexanderayakovlev crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia
AT elenaazvyagina crowdsourcingfungalbiodiversityrevisionofinaturalistobservationsinnorthwesternsiberia