Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?

This paper argues that it is not reasonable for a critical rationalist to be a religious believer in the Abrahamic tradition. The argument is distinctive, in that it takes seriously the critical rationalist view that we should abandon ‘justificationist’ argument. What this means, is that the structu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jeremy Shearmur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages 2023-05-01
Series:Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_16590_eded35f639b9a7bfcd7634bcad008952.pdf
_version_ 1797694700824559616
author Jeremy Shearmur
author_facet Jeremy Shearmur
author_sort Jeremy Shearmur
collection DOAJ
description This paper argues that it is not reasonable for a critical rationalist to be a religious believer in the Abrahamic tradition. The argument is distinctive, in that it takes seriously the critical rationalist view that we should abandon ‘justificationist’ argument. What this means, is that the structure of argument then becomes a matter of offering theories as resolutions of problems, and then judging how they fare in the face of ongoing critical appraisal. The paper surveys issues in several areas, including God and what is good; homosexuality; mysticism; and messianic ideas. It argues that, unless the believer engages in intellectual retreat (something that is unacceptable for the critical rationalist), the problem-situation facing the believer appears to be so daunting that it would be unreasonable for them to hope that they can overcome it.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:00:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f1f52faad9a746d78f0053e38316730c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-7960
2423-4419
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:00:40Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages
record_format Article
series Journal of Philosophical Investigations
spelling doaj.art-f1f52faad9a746d78f0053e38316730c2023-09-03T14:49:10ZengUniversity of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen LanguagesJournal of Philosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192023-05-01174231733110.22034/jpiut.2023.1659016590Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?Jeremy Shearmur0Emeritus Fellow, the Australian National University- Australia.This paper argues that it is not reasonable for a critical rationalist to be a religious believer in the Abrahamic tradition. The argument is distinctive, in that it takes seriously the critical rationalist view that we should abandon ‘justificationist’ argument. What this means, is that the structure of argument then becomes a matter of offering theories as resolutions of problems, and then judging how they fare in the face of ongoing critical appraisal. The paper surveys issues in several areas, including God and what is good; homosexuality; mysticism; and messianic ideas. It argues that, unless the believer engages in intellectual retreat (something that is unacceptable for the critical rationalist), the problem-situation facing the believer appears to be so daunting that it would be unreasonable for them to hope that they can overcome it.https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_16590_eded35f639b9a7bfcd7634bcad008952.pdfpoppercritical rationalismreligionfallibilitytheismobjective valuesufferinghomosexualitymysticismeschatology
spellingShingle Jeremy Shearmur
Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
popper
critical rationalism
religion
fallibility
theism
objective value
suffering
homosexuality
mysticism
eschatology
title Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?
title_full Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?
title_fullStr Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?
title_full_unstemmed Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?
title_short Is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non-religious?
title_sort is it more reasonable for a critical rationalist to be non religious
topic popper
critical rationalism
religion
fallibility
theism
objective value
suffering
homosexuality
mysticism
eschatology
url https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_16590_eded35f639b9a7bfcd7634bcad008952.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyshearmur isitmorereasonableforacriticalrationalisttobenonreligious