Valuing bets and hedges
Two studies replicate the anomaly identified by Frederick, Meyer and Levis (2015) and Frederick, Levis, Malliaris and Meyer (2018). People show typical risk averse behavior by valuing risk below the focal lottery’s expected value, but they do not bid above its expected value for the hedge that elim...
Main Authors: | Subimal Chatterjee, Satadruta Mookherjee |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18514/jdm18514.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Valuing bets and hedges
by: Subimal Chatterjee, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Valuing bets and
hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
by: Shane Frederick, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
High-stakes hedges
are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications
for the construct of risk preference”
by: Philip W. S. Newall, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
by: Shane Frederick, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Subjective but not
objective numeracy influences willingness to pay for BRCA1/2 genetic
testing
by: Talya Miron-Shatz, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01)