Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region

We present a complete cross-validation of significant wave heights (SWH) extracted from altimetry data from all ten existing satellites with available in situ (buoy and echosounder) wave measurements for the Baltic Sea basin. The main purpose is to select an adequate altimetry data subset for a subs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadezhda A. Kudryavtseva, Tarmo Soomere
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Estonian Academy Publishers 2016-08-01
Series:Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kirj.ee/public/Estonian_Journal_of_Earth_Sciences/2016/issue_3/earth-2016-3-161-175.pdf
_version_ 1818982843376730112
author Nadezhda A. Kudryavtseva
Tarmo Soomere
author_facet Nadezhda A. Kudryavtseva
Tarmo Soomere
author_sort Nadezhda A. Kudryavtseva
collection DOAJ
description We present a complete cross-validation of significant wave heights (SWH) extracted from altimetry data from all ten existing satellites with available in situ (buoy and echosounder) wave measurements for the Baltic Sea basin. The main purpose is to select an adequate altimetry data subset for a subsequent evaluation of the wave climate. The satellite measurements with the backscatter coefficients > 13.5 cdb, errors in the SWH normalized standard deviation > 0.5 m and snapshots with centroids closer than 0.2° to the land are not reliable. The ice flag usually denotes the ice concentration of > 50%. The presence of ice affects the SWH data starting from concentrations 10%, but substantial effects are only evident for concentrations > 30%. The altimetry data selected based on these criteria have very good correspondence with in situ data, except for GEOSAT Phase 1 data (1985–1989) that could not be validated. The root-mean-square difference of altimetry and in situ data is in the range of 0.23–0.37, which is significant for the Baltic Sea, compared with an average wave height of ~ 1 m. The bias for CRYOSAT-2, ERS-2, JASON-1/2 and SARAL data is below 0.06 m. The ENVISAT, ERS-1, GEOSAT and TOPEX satellites revealed larger biases up to 0.23 m. The SWH time series from several satellite pairs (ENVISAT/JASON-1, SARAL/JASON-2, ERS-1/TOPEX) exhibit substantial mutual temporal drift and part of them evidently are not homogeneous in time. A new high-resolution SWH data set from the SARAL satellite reveals a very good correspondence with the in situ data and with the data stream from previous satellites.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T17:53:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f203754b2d4d46dab9d67691c7a8ed75
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1736-4728
1736-7557
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T17:53:39Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Estonian Academy Publishers
record_format Article
series Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f203754b2d4d46dab9d67691c7a8ed752022-12-21T19:30:47ZengEstonian Academy PublishersEstonian Journal of Earth Sciences1736-47281736-75572016-08-0165316117510.3176/earth.2016.1310.3176/earth.2016.13Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea regionNadezhda A. Kudryavtseva0Tarmo Soomere1Institute of Cybernetics at Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 21, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; nadia@ioc.eeInstitute of Cybernetics at Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 21, 12618 Tallinn, EstoniaWe present a complete cross-validation of significant wave heights (SWH) extracted from altimetry data from all ten existing satellites with available in situ (buoy and echosounder) wave measurements for the Baltic Sea basin. The main purpose is to select an adequate altimetry data subset for a subsequent evaluation of the wave climate. The satellite measurements with the backscatter coefficients > 13.5 cdb, errors in the SWH normalized standard deviation > 0.5 m and snapshots with centroids closer than 0.2° to the land are not reliable. The ice flag usually denotes the ice concentration of > 50%. The presence of ice affects the SWH data starting from concentrations 10%, but substantial effects are only evident for concentrations > 30%. The altimetry data selected based on these criteria have very good correspondence with in situ data, except for GEOSAT Phase 1 data (1985–1989) that could not be validated. The root-mean-square difference of altimetry and in situ data is in the range of 0.23–0.37, which is significant for the Baltic Sea, compared with an average wave height of ~ 1 m. The bias for CRYOSAT-2, ERS-2, JASON-1/2 and SARAL data is below 0.06 m. The ENVISAT, ERS-1, GEOSAT and TOPEX satellites revealed larger biases up to 0.23 m. The SWH time series from several satellite pairs (ENVISAT/JASON-1, SARAL/JASON-2, ERS-1/TOPEX) exhibit substantial mutual temporal drift and part of them evidently are not homogeneous in time. A new high-resolution SWH data set from the SARAL satellite reveals a very good correspondence with the in situ data and with the data stream from previous satellites.http://www.kirj.ee/public/Estonian_Journal_of_Earth_Sciences/2016/issue_3/earth-2016-3-161-175.pdfaltimetervalidationsignificant wave heightBaltic Seawave climateSARAL/AltiKa.
spellingShingle Nadezhda A. Kudryavtseva
Tarmo Soomere
Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region
Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences
altimeter
validation
significant wave height
Baltic Sea
wave climate
SARAL/AltiKa.
title Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region
title_full Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region
title_fullStr Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region
title_short Validation of the multi-mission altimeter wave height data for the Baltic Sea region
title_sort validation of the multi mission altimeter wave height data for the baltic sea region
topic altimeter
validation
significant wave height
Baltic Sea
wave climate
SARAL/AltiKa.
url http://www.kirj.ee/public/Estonian_Journal_of_Earth_Sciences/2016/issue_3/earth-2016-3-161-175.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nadezhdaakudryavtseva validationofthemultimissionaltimeterwaveheightdataforthebalticsearegion
AT tarmosoomere validationofthemultimissionaltimeterwaveheightdataforthebalticsearegion