Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures

OBJECTIVE: To compare the value of Q angle in different positions, in the external and internal rotations of lower limbs. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. We have evaluated 62 volunteers, 32 women and 30 men in the following positions: supine positions with parallel feet, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Machado Sanchez, Eliane Gouveia de Morais Sanchez, Mario Antonio Baraúna, Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2014-12-01
Series:Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000600325&tlng=en
_version_ 1818889413034246144
author Hugo Machado Sanchez
Eliane Gouveia de Morais Sanchez
Mario Antonio Baraúna
Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto
author_facet Hugo Machado Sanchez
Eliane Gouveia de Morais Sanchez
Mario Antonio Baraúna
Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto
author_sort Hugo Machado Sanchez
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the value of Q angle in different positions, in the external and internal rotations of lower limbs. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. We have evaluated 62 volunteers, 32 women and 30 men in the following positions: supine positions with parallel feet, supine with abduction (external rotation of lower limbs), and standing position with parallel feet and with external rotation. All the participants were sedentary and without previous history of acute injury or complaints regarding lower limbs. In order to calculate the Q angle we used computerized biophotogrammetry through ALC image 2.1(r) program. RESULTS: The results of the comparisons showed significant difference between the standing position with feet parallel and orthostatic positions with abductees feet on the left side for both genders (p = 0.000). We also found a significant difference between supine and standing position with abducted feet and with feet parallel on the left side (p = 0.046) in females. CONCLUSION: From these results, we can conclude that there are significant differences in the standing position with abducted feet and parallel to the left leg, and symmetry between the lower limbs independent of rotation of limbs in the supine posture. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T17:08:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f203fe3c846f424b91498278a1e9a407
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1413-7852
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T17:08:37Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
record_format Article
series Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
spelling doaj.art-f203fe3c846f424b91498278a1e9a4072022-12-21T20:13:06ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaActa Ortopédica Brasileira1413-78522014-12-0122632532910.1590/1413-78522014220600451Evaluation of Q angle in differents static posturesHugo Machado SanchezEliane Gouveia de Morais SanchezMario Antonio BaraúnaRoberto Sérgio de Tavares CantoOBJECTIVE: To compare the value of Q angle in different positions, in the external and internal rotations of lower limbs. METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. We have evaluated 62 volunteers, 32 women and 30 men in the following positions: supine positions with parallel feet, supine with abduction (external rotation of lower limbs), and standing position with parallel feet and with external rotation. All the participants were sedentary and without previous history of acute injury or complaints regarding lower limbs. In order to calculate the Q angle we used computerized biophotogrammetry through ALC image 2.1(r) program. RESULTS: The results of the comparisons showed significant difference between the standing position with feet parallel and orthostatic positions with abductees feet on the left side for both genders (p = 0.000). We also found a significant difference between supine and standing position with abducted feet and with feet parallel on the left side (p = 0.046) in females. CONCLUSION: From these results, we can conclude that there are significant differences in the standing position with abducted feet and parallel to the left leg, and symmetry between the lower limbs independent of rotation of limbs in the supine posture. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies Investigating a Diagnostic Test.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000600325&tlng=enPostureEvaluationKneePhotogrammetry
spellingShingle Hugo Machado Sanchez
Eliane Gouveia de Morais Sanchez
Mario Antonio Baraúna
Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto
Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira
Posture
Evaluation
Knee
Photogrammetry
title Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures
title_full Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures
title_fullStr Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures
title_short Evaluation of Q angle in differents static postures
title_sort evaluation of q angle in differents static postures
topic Posture
Evaluation
Knee
Photogrammetry
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-78522014000600325&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT hugomachadosanchez evaluationofqangleindifferentsstaticpostures
AT elianegouveiademoraissanchez evaluationofqangleindifferentsstaticpostures
AT marioantoniobarauna evaluationofqangleindifferentsstaticpostures
AT robertosergiodetavarescanto evaluationofqangleindifferentsstaticpostures