Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID

This paper focusses on the consequences for the dialectic between preservation of privacy and the opportunity to take advantage of the possibilities that technology offers us to control epidemics such as COVID. STC 76/2019, of May 22 rules a set of accurate guarantees to be taken into consideration...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rafael Rodríguez Prieto
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: University of Valencia 2020-12-01
Series:Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho
Online Access:https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/CEFD/article/view/17548
_version_ 1797378499145629696
author Rafael Rodríguez Prieto
author_facet Rafael Rodríguez Prieto
author_sort Rafael Rodríguez Prieto
collection DOAJ
description This paper focusses on the consequences for the dialectic between preservation of privacy and the opportunity to take advantage of the possibilities that technology offers us to control epidemics such as COVID. STC 76/2019, of May 22 rules a set of accurate guarantees to be taken into consideration in the design of applications that control and surveillance, justified by the entity of the epidemiological crisis, but which in no case should serve to limit or restrict constitutionally guaranteed rights. This paper will analyze the case of Radar COVID.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:07:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f20c16aad8004161bd4eb7deb051985c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1138-9877
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:07:38Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher University of Valencia
record_format Article
series Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho
spelling doaj.art-f20c16aad8004161bd4eb7deb051985c2023-12-23T07:31:16ZspaUniversity of ValenciaCuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho1138-98772020-12-0104318921910.7203/CEFD.43.1754813951Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVIDRafael Rodríguez PrietoThis paper focusses on the consequences for the dialectic between preservation of privacy and the opportunity to take advantage of the possibilities that technology offers us to control epidemics such as COVID. STC 76/2019, of May 22 rules a set of accurate guarantees to be taken into consideration in the design of applications that control and surveillance, justified by the entity of the epidemiological crisis, but which in no case should serve to limit or restrict constitutionally guaranteed rights. This paper will analyze the case of Radar COVID.https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/CEFD/article/view/17548
spellingShingle Rafael Rodríguez Prieto
Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID
Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho
title Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID
title_full Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID
title_fullStr Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID
title_short Consequences of STC 76/2019, May 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize COVID. The case of Radar COVID
title_sort consequences of stc 76 2019 may 22 on privacy and apps to monitorize covid the case of radar covid
url https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/CEFD/article/view/17548
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelrodriguezprieto consequencesofstc762019may22onprivacyandappstomonitorizecovidthecaseofradarcovid