Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations

Abstract Drug development is a time-consuming and expensive process, given the low success rate of clinical trials. Now, anticancer drug developments have shifted to three-dimensional (3D) models which are more likely to mimic tumor behavior compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) cultures. A c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zaid Nsaif Abbas, Ali Z. Al-Saffar, Saba Mahdi Jasim, Ghassan M. Sulaiman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45144-w
_version_ 1797647371454119936
author Zaid Nsaif Abbas
Ali Z. Al-Saffar
Saba Mahdi Jasim
Ghassan M. Sulaiman
author_facet Zaid Nsaif Abbas
Ali Z. Al-Saffar
Saba Mahdi Jasim
Ghassan M. Sulaiman
author_sort Zaid Nsaif Abbas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Drug development is a time-consuming and expensive process, given the low success rate of clinical trials. Now, anticancer drug developments have shifted to three-dimensional (3D) models which are more likely to mimic tumor behavior compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) cultures. A comparative study among different aspects was conducted between 2D and 3D cultures using colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines, in addition, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) block samples of patients with CRC were used for evaluation. Compared to the 2D culture, cells grown in 3D displayed significant (p < 0.01) differences in the pattern of cell proliferation over time, cell death phase profile, expression of tumorgenicity-related genes, and responsiveness to 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and doxorubicin. Epigenetically, 3D cultures and FFPE shared the same methylation pattern and microRNA expression, while 2D cells showed elevation in methylation rate and altered microRNA expression. Lastly, transcriptomic study depending on RNA sequencing and thorough bioinformatic analyses showed significant (p-adj < 0.05) dissimilarity in gene expression profile between 2D and 3D cultures involving thousands of genes (up/down-regulated) of multiple pathways for each cell line. Taken together, the study provides insights into variations in cellular morphologies between cells cultured in 2D and 3D models.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:15:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f21165992a1b4954ad29b562162b3c88
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:15:16Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-f21165992a1b4954ad29b562162b3c882023-10-29T12:23:30ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-0113111610.1038/s41598-023-45144-wComparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variationsZaid Nsaif Abbas0Ali Z. Al-Saffar1Saba Mahdi Jasim2Ghassan M. Sulaiman3Department of Molecular and Medical Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology, Al-Nahrain UniversityDepartment of Molecular and Medical Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology, Al-Nahrain UniversityOncology Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Ministry of HealthDivision of Biotechnology, Department of Applied Sciences, University of TechnologyAbstract Drug development is a time-consuming and expensive process, given the low success rate of clinical trials. Now, anticancer drug developments have shifted to three-dimensional (3D) models which are more likely to mimic tumor behavior compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) cultures. A comparative study among different aspects was conducted between 2D and 3D cultures using colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines, in addition, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) block samples of patients with CRC were used for evaluation. Compared to the 2D culture, cells grown in 3D displayed significant (p < 0.01) differences in the pattern of cell proliferation over time, cell death phase profile, expression of tumorgenicity-related genes, and responsiveness to 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and doxorubicin. Epigenetically, 3D cultures and FFPE shared the same methylation pattern and microRNA expression, while 2D cells showed elevation in methylation rate and altered microRNA expression. Lastly, transcriptomic study depending on RNA sequencing and thorough bioinformatic analyses showed significant (p-adj < 0.05) dissimilarity in gene expression profile between 2D and 3D cultures involving thousands of genes (up/down-regulated) of multiple pathways for each cell line. Taken together, the study provides insights into variations in cellular morphologies between cells cultured in 2D and 3D models.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45144-w
spellingShingle Zaid Nsaif Abbas
Ali Z. Al-Saffar
Saba Mahdi Jasim
Ghassan M. Sulaiman
Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
Scientific Reports
title Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
title_full Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
title_fullStr Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
title_short Comparative analysis between 2D and 3D colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
title_sort comparative analysis between 2d and 3d colorectal cancer culture models for insights into cellular morphological and transcriptomic variations
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45144-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zaidnsaifabbas comparativeanalysisbetween2dand3dcolorectalcancerculturemodelsforinsightsintocellularmorphologicalandtranscriptomicvariations
AT alizalsaffar comparativeanalysisbetween2dand3dcolorectalcancerculturemodelsforinsightsintocellularmorphologicalandtranscriptomicvariations
AT sabamahdijasim comparativeanalysisbetween2dand3dcolorectalcancerculturemodelsforinsightsintocellularmorphologicalandtranscriptomicvariations
AT ghassanmsulaiman comparativeanalysisbetween2dand3dcolorectalcancerculturemodelsforinsightsintocellularmorphologicalandtranscriptomicvariations