Peer review art

Peer review art

Not available

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Shahryar Sorooshian
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	PAGEPress Publications 2017-07-01
Series:	Italian Journal of Medicine
Subjects:	Peer review process journal management publication.
Online Access:	http://www.italjmed.org/index.php/ijm/article/view/897

Similar Items

Abuse of peer review process by sham authors
by: Senthil Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Peer review of manuscripts submitted to medical journals
by: Mohamed Abdelfattah Mahmoud Youssef
Published: (2012-06-01)

The “Peer” in “Peer Review”
by: Gad Perry, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports
by: Vincent Raoult
Published: (2020-01-01)

Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial
by: Houry Debra, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01)

Peer Review Ethics in Iranian Scientific Journals: Evidence-Based Case Study of the Journal of Information Processing and Management (JIPM)
by: Reza Rajabali beglou, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Peer review golden rules and good practice checklist
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2016-02-01)

«I Do Not Have Time»—Is This the End of Peer Review in Public Health Sciences?
by: Nino Künzli, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Peer review: An essential component of scientific publications
by: M Mostafa Zaman
Published: (2023-12-01)

Peer review: An essential component of scientific publications
by: M Mostafa Zaman
Published: (2023-12-01)

Peer review: An essential component of scientific publications
by: M Mostafa Zaman
Published: (2023-12-01)

Unworthy peer review process and publishing method
by: Mehdi Dadkhah, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Improving The Quality Of Peer Review: GGA Instructions For Reviewers
by: Patrick Alexander Wachholz
Published: (2024-10-01)

Peer-review and its role in the scholarly communication system: specialized journals as an example
by: Abdelrahman Farrag
Published: (2009-03-01)

Acknowledgement to reviewers
by: Editor-in-Chief
Published: (2022-11-01)

Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals
by: Daniel Garcia-Costa, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

Peer review: what are the OBJN responsabilities?
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2006-12-01)

Acknowledgement to reviewers
by: Editor-in-Chief
Published: (2021-11-01)

Acknowledgement to reviewers
by: Editor-in-Chief
Published: (2023-11-01)

Process and quality of peer review in scientific Nursing journals
by: Wai Tong Chien
Published: (2011-09-01)

Scientific peer review in the modern era: A comprehensive guide
by: Nimrat Kaur Sandhu, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions
by: Sunkyung Seo, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 2007 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2007-12-01)

Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 2007 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2007-11-01)

Online Braz J of Nursing 2006 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2006-12-01)

A Decade of Publication of the First Peer-reviewed Scientifi c Journal in Mongolia – Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences
by: Badamdorj Bayartogtokh
Published: (2012-12-01)

Substandard Journal Management: Wastage of Authors’ Motivation
by: Shahryar Sorooshian, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

QUALITY PEER REVIEW IS ESSENTIAL FOR SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
by: Ilke Coskun Benlidayi
Published: (2022-03-01)

Contamination by citations: references to predatory journals in the peer-reviewed marketing literature
by: Salim Moussa
Published: (2021-09-01)

Injecting youth into peer-review to increase its sustainability: a case study of ecology journals
by: Michael R Donaldson, et al.
Published: (2010-02-01)

The future of journals
by: Harlan M. Krumholz
Published: (2022-08-01)

What makes a topic “relevant” to journal editors?
by: Sara Palacio, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01)

Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals
by: Steven Cooke, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Conversion Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Société Internationale d’Urologie into Peer-Reviewed Journal Publications
by: Amandeep Virk, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
by: Piitu Parmanne, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

The Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences’ Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles
by: Sirous Panahi, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Acknowledgement to reviewers
by: Editor-in-Chief
Published: (2020-11-01)

Improving Submissions to Scholarly Journals via Peer Review
by: Lilia Raitskaya, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
by: Răzvan Valentin Florian
Published: (2012-05-01)

Peer review ethics in Iranian LIS scholarly journals: a comparison between views of reviewers and authors
by: Rahmatollah Fattahi, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)