Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression

Abstract Adverse childhood experiences have been consistently linked with physical and mental health disorders in adulthood that may be mediated, in part, via the effects of such exposures on biological aging. Using recently developed “epigenetic clocks”, which provide an estimate of biological age,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan Rampersaud, Ekaterina Protsenko, Ruoting Yang, Victor Reus, Rasha Hammamieh, Gwyneth W. Y. Wu, Elissa Epel, Marti Jett, Aarti Gautam, Synthia H. Mellon, Owen M. Wolkowitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2022-10-01
Series:Translational Psychiatry
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02198-0
_version_ 1811194945914011648
author Ryan Rampersaud
Ekaterina Protsenko
Ruoting Yang
Victor Reus
Rasha Hammamieh
Gwyneth W. Y. Wu
Elissa Epel
Marti Jett
Aarti Gautam
Synthia H. Mellon
Owen M. Wolkowitz
author_facet Ryan Rampersaud
Ekaterina Protsenko
Ruoting Yang
Victor Reus
Rasha Hammamieh
Gwyneth W. Y. Wu
Elissa Epel
Marti Jett
Aarti Gautam
Synthia H. Mellon
Owen M. Wolkowitz
author_sort Ryan Rampersaud
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Adverse childhood experiences have been consistently linked with physical and mental health disorders in adulthood that may be mediated, in part, via the effects of such exposures on biological aging. Using recently developed “epigenetic clocks”, which provide an estimate of biological age, several studies have demonstrated a link between the cumulative exposure to childhood adversities and accelerated epigenetic aging. However, not all childhood adversities are equivalent and less is known about how distinct dimensions of childhood adversity relate to epigenetic aging metrics. Using two measures of childhood adversity exposure, we assess how the dimensions of Maltreatment and Household Dysfunction relate to epigenetic aging using two “second-generation” clocks, GrimAge and PhenoAge, in a cohort of unmedicated somatically healthy adults with moderate to severe major depression (n = 82). Our results demonstrate that the dimension of Maltreatment is associated with epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) using the PhenoAge but not the GrimAge clock. This association was observed using both the Childhood Trauma questionnaire (CTQ; β = 0.272, p = 0.013) and the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) questionnaire (β = 0.307, p = 0.005) and remained significant when adjusting for exposure to the dimension of Household Dysfunction (β = 0.322, p = 0.009). In contrast, the dimension of Household Dysfunction is associated with epigenetic age deceleration (β = −0.194, p = 0.083) which achieved significance after adjusting for exposure to the dimension of Maltreatment (β = −0.304, p = 0.022). This study is the first to investigate these effects among individuals with Major Depressive Disorder and suggests that these dimensions of adversity may be associated with disease via distinct biological mechanisms.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:34:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f221bc9ea6514ef5816e1a754594afdb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-3188
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:34:46Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Translational Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-f221bc9ea6514ef5816e1a754594afdb2022-12-22T03:55:11ZengNature Publishing GroupTranslational Psychiatry2158-31882022-10-011211910.1038/s41398-022-02198-0Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depressionRyan Rampersaud0Ekaterina Protsenko1Ruoting Yang2Victor Reus3Rasha Hammamieh4Gwyneth W. Y. Wu5Elissa Epel6Marti Jett7Aarti Gautam8Synthia H. Mellon9Owen M. Wolkowitz10Weill Institute for Neurosciences and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of MedicineUniversity of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of MedicineMedical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of ResearchWeill Institute for Neurosciences and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of MedicineMedical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of ResearchWeill Institute for Neurosciences and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of MedicineWeill Institute for Neurosciences and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of MedicineHeadquarters, Walter Reed Army Institute of ResearchMedical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of ResearchDepartment of OB-GYN and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF School of MedicineWeill Institute for Neurosciences and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of MedicineAbstract Adverse childhood experiences have been consistently linked with physical and mental health disorders in adulthood that may be mediated, in part, via the effects of such exposures on biological aging. Using recently developed “epigenetic clocks”, which provide an estimate of biological age, several studies have demonstrated a link between the cumulative exposure to childhood adversities and accelerated epigenetic aging. However, not all childhood adversities are equivalent and less is known about how distinct dimensions of childhood adversity relate to epigenetic aging metrics. Using two measures of childhood adversity exposure, we assess how the dimensions of Maltreatment and Household Dysfunction relate to epigenetic aging using two “second-generation” clocks, GrimAge and PhenoAge, in a cohort of unmedicated somatically healthy adults with moderate to severe major depression (n = 82). Our results demonstrate that the dimension of Maltreatment is associated with epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) using the PhenoAge but not the GrimAge clock. This association was observed using both the Childhood Trauma questionnaire (CTQ; β = 0.272, p = 0.013) and the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) questionnaire (β = 0.307, p = 0.005) and remained significant when adjusting for exposure to the dimension of Household Dysfunction (β = 0.322, p = 0.009). In contrast, the dimension of Household Dysfunction is associated with epigenetic age deceleration (β = −0.194, p = 0.083) which achieved significance after adjusting for exposure to the dimension of Maltreatment (β = −0.304, p = 0.022). This study is the first to investigate these effects among individuals with Major Depressive Disorder and suggests that these dimensions of adversity may be associated with disease via distinct biological mechanisms.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02198-0
spellingShingle Ryan Rampersaud
Ekaterina Protsenko
Ruoting Yang
Victor Reus
Rasha Hammamieh
Gwyneth W. Y. Wu
Elissa Epel
Marti Jett
Aarti Gautam
Synthia H. Mellon
Owen M. Wolkowitz
Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
Translational Psychiatry
title Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
title_full Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
title_fullStr Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
title_full_unstemmed Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
title_short Dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
title_sort dimensions of childhood adversity differentially affect biological aging in major depression
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02198-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanrampersaud dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT ekaterinaprotsenko dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT ruotingyang dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT victorreus dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT rashahammamieh dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT gwynethwywu dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT elissaepel dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT martijett dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT aartigautam dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT synthiahmellon dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression
AT owenmwolkowitz dimensionsofchildhoodadversitydifferentiallyaffectbiologicalaginginmajordepression