Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?

Abstract News and social media play an important role in public political discourse. It is not clear what quantifiable relationships public discussions of politics have with official discourse within legislative bodies. In this study we present an analysis of how language used by Members of Parliame...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Bollenbacher, Niklas Loynes, John Bryden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-10-01
Series:EPJ Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00364-4
_version_ 1811226701186727936
author John Bollenbacher
Niklas Loynes
John Bryden
author_facet John Bollenbacher
Niklas Loynes
John Bryden
author_sort John Bollenbacher
collection DOAJ
description Abstract News and social media play an important role in public political discourse. It is not clear what quantifiable relationships public discussions of politics have with official discourse within legislative bodies. In this study we present an analysis of how language used by Members of Parliament (MPs) in the United Kingdom (UK) changes after social media posts and online reactions to those posts. We consider three domains: news articles posted on Facebook in the UK, speeches in the questions-debates in the UK House of Commons, and Tweets by UK MPs. Our method works by quantifying how the words used in one domain become more common in another domain after an event such as a social media post. Our results show that words used in one domain later appear more commonly in other domains. For instance after each article on Facebook, we estimate that on average 4 in 100,000 words in Commons speeches had changed, becoming more similar to the language in the article. We also find that the extent of this language change positively correlates with the number of comments and emotional interactions on Facebook. The observed language change differs between political parties; in particular, changes in word use by Labour MPs are more strongly related to social media content than that of Conservative MPs. We argue that the magnitude of this word flow is quite substantial given the large volume of news articles shared on Facebook. Our method and results quantify how parliamentary attention follows public interest as expressed on Facebook and also indicate how this effect may be stronger for posts which evoke reactions on Facebook associated with laughter or anger.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:29:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f23009f349034a2f9764bb2f4c3588a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-1127
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:29:44Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series EPJ Data Science
spelling doaj.art-f23009f349034a2f9764bb2f4c3588a52022-12-22T03:38:24ZengSpringerOpenEPJ Data Science2193-11272022-10-0111111410.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00364-4Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?John Bollenbacher0Niklas Loynes1John Bryden2Observatory on Social Media, Indiana UniversityUniversity of ManchesterObservatory on Social Media, Indiana UniversityAbstract News and social media play an important role in public political discourse. It is not clear what quantifiable relationships public discussions of politics have with official discourse within legislative bodies. In this study we present an analysis of how language used by Members of Parliament (MPs) in the United Kingdom (UK) changes after social media posts and online reactions to those posts. We consider three domains: news articles posted on Facebook in the UK, speeches in the questions-debates in the UK House of Commons, and Tweets by UK MPs. Our method works by quantifying how the words used in one domain become more common in another domain after an event such as a social media post. Our results show that words used in one domain later appear more commonly in other domains. For instance after each article on Facebook, we estimate that on average 4 in 100,000 words in Commons speeches had changed, becoming more similar to the language in the article. We also find that the extent of this language change positively correlates with the number of comments and emotional interactions on Facebook. The observed language change differs between political parties; in particular, changes in word use by Labour MPs are more strongly related to social media content than that of Conservative MPs. We argue that the magnitude of this word flow is quite substantial given the large volume of news articles shared on Facebook. Our method and results quantify how parliamentary attention follows public interest as expressed on Facebook and also indicate how this effect may be stronger for posts which evoke reactions on Facebook associated with laughter or anger.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00364-4Social mediaParliamentFacebookTwitterLegislative discourseContent flow analysis
spellingShingle John Bollenbacher
Niklas Loynes
John Bryden
Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?
EPJ Data Science
Social media
Parliament
Facebook
Twitter
Legislative discourse
Content flow analysis
title Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?
title_full Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?
title_fullStr Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?
title_full_unstemmed Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?
title_short Does United Kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts?
title_sort does united kingdom parliamentary attention follow social media posts
topic Social media
Parliament
Facebook
Twitter
Legislative discourse
Content flow analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00364-4
work_keys_str_mv AT johnbollenbacher doesunitedkingdomparliamentaryattentionfollowsocialmediaposts
AT niklasloynes doesunitedkingdomparliamentaryattentionfollowsocialmediaposts
AT johnbryden doesunitedkingdomparliamentaryattentionfollowsocialmediaposts