PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG
Advocates are the most vulnerable professions to be Gatekeepers in money laundering. Indeed, the advocate profession is part of the law enforcement apparatus that can contribute better in preventing money laundering activities to develop. Affirmation about the role of advocate that can suppress the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Airlangga
2018-07-01
|
| Series: | Media Iuris |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MI/article/view/8835 |
| _version_ | 1797990070736650240 |
|---|---|
| author | Rendy Ardy Septia Yuristara |
| author_facet | Rendy Ardy Septia Yuristara |
| author_sort | Rendy Ardy Septia Yuristara |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Advocates are the most vulnerable professions to be Gatekeepers in money laundering. Indeed, the advocate profession is part of the law enforcement apparatus that can contribute better in preventing money laundering activities to develop. Affirmation about the role of advocate that can suppress the occurrence of money laundering crime, that is with the issuance of PP. 43 of 2015, which places advocates as one of the reporting parties in the agenda of eradicating money laundering crime. However, the substance of the rule draws criticism from some misguided advocates in interpreting the intent and purpose of the arrangement. Moreover there are some advocates who consider that the rule is against the rules that regulate immunity rights in the profession advocate. The misinterpretation of some advocates related to the immunity rights inherent in the profession, causing the work of the advocate profession to be considered irrelevant, and not worthy of being called the nobleprofession (OfficiumNobile), But as a bad profession in integrity and promoting commercialization. In fact, the basic purpose of the arrangement of PP. 43 of 2015, which places the advocate profession as one of the reporting parties on the eradication agenda of money laundering, is a form of respect for the profession of advocate who is a noble profession, by prioritizing his professional responsibilities to the state, society and God, as well as his obligations as part of The legal profession to uphold the law and uphold the value of human rights while on duty. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:30:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f23a3e31be5c400e9432cc0452c50290 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2721-8384 2621-5225 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T08:30:38Z |
| publishDate | 2018-07-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Airlangga |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Media Iuris |
| spelling | doaj.art-f23a3e31be5c400e9432cc0452c502902022-12-22T04:34:33ZengUniversitas AirlanggaMedia Iuris2721-83842621-52252018-07-011235037210.20473/mi.v1i2.88356988PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANGRendy Ardy Septia Yuristara0Universitas AirlanggaAdvocates are the most vulnerable professions to be Gatekeepers in money laundering. Indeed, the advocate profession is part of the law enforcement apparatus that can contribute better in preventing money laundering activities to develop. Affirmation about the role of advocate that can suppress the occurrence of money laundering crime, that is with the issuance of PP. 43 of 2015, which places advocates as one of the reporting parties in the agenda of eradicating money laundering crime. However, the substance of the rule draws criticism from some misguided advocates in interpreting the intent and purpose of the arrangement. Moreover there are some advocates who consider that the rule is against the rules that regulate immunity rights in the profession advocate. The misinterpretation of some advocates related to the immunity rights inherent in the profession, causing the work of the advocate profession to be considered irrelevant, and not worthy of being called the nobleprofession (OfficiumNobile), But as a bad profession in integrity and promoting commercialization. In fact, the basic purpose of the arrangement of PP. 43 of 2015, which places the advocate profession as one of the reporting parties on the eradication agenda of money laundering, is a form of respect for the profession of advocate who is a noble profession, by prioritizing his professional responsibilities to the state, society and God, as well as his obligations as part of The legal profession to uphold the law and uphold the value of human rights while on duty.https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MI/article/view/8835advocate professiongatekeepermoney launderingcrimereporting party. |
| spellingShingle | Rendy Ardy Septia Yuristara PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG Media Iuris advocate profession gatekeeper money laundering crime reporting party. |
| title | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG |
| title_full | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG |
| title_fullStr | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG |
| title_full_unstemmed | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG |
| title_short | PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG |
| title_sort | pertanggungjawaban advokat sebagai gatekeeper dalam kaitannya dengan tindak pidana pencucian uang |
| topic | advocate profession gatekeeper money laundering crime reporting party. |
| url | https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MI/article/view/8835 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rendyardyseptiayuristara pertanggungjawabanadvokatsebagaigatekeeperdalamkaitannyadengantindakpidanapencucianuang |