Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network

Despite 70 years of investigations in understanding the shear behaviour of reinforced concrete members, it is again gaining attention among structural engineers as the recently issued Australian concrete design standard, AS 3600 updated its shear provisions and ACI 318 unveiled its new one-way shear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thushara Jayasinghe, Tharaka Gunawardena, Priyan Mendis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:Case Studies in Construction Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509522002340
_version_ 1818547924810858496
author Thushara Jayasinghe
Tharaka Gunawardena
Priyan Mendis
author_facet Thushara Jayasinghe
Tharaka Gunawardena
Priyan Mendis
author_sort Thushara Jayasinghe
collection DOAJ
description Despite 70 years of investigations in understanding the shear behaviour of reinforced concrete members, it is again gaining attention among structural engineers as the recently issued Australian concrete design standard, AS 3600 updated its shear provisions and ACI 318 unveiled its new one-way shear design equation. This study investigates the shear design equations in ACI 318–19 and AS 3600–2018 highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. A detailed parametric study is performed on a database of 1237 shear tests of point loaded RC slender beams without shear reinforcement. An Artificial neural network (ANN) was built, trained and validated with a subset of this database. Further, a very few experimental tests were conducted isolating the effect of a single variable on the shear failure load of RC beams without shear reinforcement. Thus, an ANN is an effective tool to investigate the influence of each variable individually. This study concludes that the introduction of size effect and ρw1/3 terms into the new ACI 318–19 code have resulted in greater accuracy compared to ACI 318–14 which it replaced. The study further demonstrates that AS 3600–2018 agrees well with all ranges of test parameters. The ANN demonstrated more accurate predictions compared to the codes of practice within the range of input parameters considered.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:13:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f25d240ef45f418a8cb0a5ee608aa58a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-5095
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:13:09Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Case Studies in Construction Materials
spelling doaj.art-f25d240ef45f418a8cb0a5ee608aa58a2022-12-22T00:31:42ZengElsevierCase Studies in Construction Materials2214-50952022-06-0116e01102Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural networkThushara Jayasinghe0Tharaka Gunawardena1Priyan Mendis2Corresponding author.; Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AustraliaFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AustraliaFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AustraliaDespite 70 years of investigations in understanding the shear behaviour of reinforced concrete members, it is again gaining attention among structural engineers as the recently issued Australian concrete design standard, AS 3600 updated its shear provisions and ACI 318 unveiled its new one-way shear design equation. This study investigates the shear design equations in ACI 318–19 and AS 3600–2018 highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. A detailed parametric study is performed on a database of 1237 shear tests of point loaded RC slender beams without shear reinforcement. An Artificial neural network (ANN) was built, trained and validated with a subset of this database. Further, a very few experimental tests were conducted isolating the effect of a single variable on the shear failure load of RC beams without shear reinforcement. Thus, an ANN is an effective tool to investigate the influence of each variable individually. This study concludes that the introduction of size effect and ρw1/3 terms into the new ACI 318–19 code have resulted in greater accuracy compared to ACI 318–14 which it replaced. The study further demonstrates that AS 3600–2018 agrees well with all ranges of test parameters. The ANN demonstrated more accurate predictions compared to the codes of practice within the range of input parameters considered.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509522002340Shear strengthSize effectStrain effectBack-propagation neural networkSigmoid function
spellingShingle Thushara Jayasinghe
Tharaka Gunawardena
Priyan Mendis
Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Shear strength
Size effect
Strain effect
Back-propagation neural network
Sigmoid function
title Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
title_full Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
title_fullStr Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
title_short Assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement: A comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
title_sort assessment of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement a comparative study between codes of practice and artificial neural network
topic Shear strength
Size effect
Strain effect
Back-propagation neural network
Sigmoid function
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509522002340
work_keys_str_mv AT thusharajayasinghe assessmentofshearstrengthofreinforcedconcretebeamswithoutshearreinforcementacomparativestudybetweencodesofpracticeandartificialneuralnetwork
AT tharakagunawardena assessmentofshearstrengthofreinforcedconcretebeamswithoutshearreinforcementacomparativestudybetweencodesofpracticeandartificialneuralnetwork
AT priyanmendis assessmentofshearstrengthofreinforcedconcretebeamswithoutshearreinforcementacomparativestudybetweencodesofpracticeandartificialneuralnetwork