‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV

This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV. A qualitative approach to investigation involved five focus group discussions with 30 Community representatives, 12 key informant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sylvia Nabukenya, David Kyaddondo, Adelline Twimukye, Ian Guyton Munabi, Catriona Waitt, Erisa S Mwaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-04-01
Series:Research Ethics Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231207739
_version_ 1797209727640272896
author Sylvia Nabukenya
David Kyaddondo
Adelline Twimukye
Ian Guyton Munabi
Catriona Waitt
Erisa S Mwaka
author_facet Sylvia Nabukenya
David Kyaddondo
Adelline Twimukye
Ian Guyton Munabi
Catriona Waitt
Erisa S Mwaka
author_sort Sylvia Nabukenya
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to explore stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV. A qualitative approach to investigation involved five focus group discussions with 30 Community representatives, 12 key informant interviews with researchers, and 12 in-depth interviews with research ethics committee members. In total, 54 stakeholders who were involved in pharmacogenomics research and HIV treatment and care contributed to the data collection between September 2021 and February 2022. The study explored five prominent themes: (i) defining the nature of research results to return to participants; (ii) preparing research participants to receive their results; (iii) obtaining informed consent for the return of results; (iv) opinions on health personnel to return the results to participants; and (v) opinions on how research results should be communicated to participants. Respondents identified various strategies for the return of individual results with minimal ethical risks including the setting up of a diverse and independent committee to undertake a risk-benefit assessment based on local context; ongoing discussions about the possible kinds of results and their implications throughout the study; and employing genetic counsellors to communicate results to participants. The strategies identified in this study should be further studied and independently verified.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:59:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f27851ec4d074f6783f89f709cebfd10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1747-0161
2047-6094
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:59:18Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Research Ethics Review
spelling doaj.art-f27851ec4d074f6783f89f709cebfd102024-04-14T01:03:42ZengSAGE PublishingResearch Ethics Review1747-01612047-60942024-04-012010.1177/17470161231207739‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIVSylvia NabukenyaDavid KyaddondoAdelline TwimukyeIan Guyton MunabiCatriona WaittErisa S MwakaThis study aimed to explore stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV. A qualitative approach to investigation involved five focus group discussions with 30 Community representatives, 12 key informant interviews with researchers, and 12 in-depth interviews with research ethics committee members. In total, 54 stakeholders who were involved in pharmacogenomics research and HIV treatment and care contributed to the data collection between September 2021 and February 2022. The study explored five prominent themes: (i) defining the nature of research results to return to participants; (ii) preparing research participants to receive their results; (iii) obtaining informed consent for the return of results; (iv) opinions on health personnel to return the results to participants; and (v) opinions on how research results should be communicated to participants. Respondents identified various strategies for the return of individual results with minimal ethical risks including the setting up of a diverse and independent committee to undertake a risk-benefit assessment based on local context; ongoing discussions about the possible kinds of results and their implications throughout the study; and employing genetic counsellors to communicate results to participants. The strategies identified in this study should be further studied and independently verified.https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231207739
spellingShingle Sylvia Nabukenya
David Kyaddondo
Adelline Twimukye
Ian Guyton Munabi
Catriona Waitt
Erisa S Mwaka
‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV
Research Ethics Review
title ‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV
title_full ‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV
title_fullStr ‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV
title_full_unstemmed ‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV
title_short ‘. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with HIV
title_sort stakeholders perspectives on the ethical considerations for returning individual pharmacogenomics research results to people living with hiv
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231207739
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvianabukenya stakeholdersperspectivesontheethicalconsiderationsforreturningindividualpharmacogenomicsresearchresultstopeoplelivingwithhiv
AT davidkyaddondo stakeholdersperspectivesontheethicalconsiderationsforreturningindividualpharmacogenomicsresearchresultstopeoplelivingwithhiv
AT adellinetwimukye stakeholdersperspectivesontheethicalconsiderationsforreturningindividualpharmacogenomicsresearchresultstopeoplelivingwithhiv
AT ianguytonmunabi stakeholdersperspectivesontheethicalconsiderationsforreturningindividualpharmacogenomicsresearchresultstopeoplelivingwithhiv
AT catrionawaitt stakeholdersperspectivesontheethicalconsiderationsforreturningindividualpharmacogenomicsresearchresultstopeoplelivingwithhiv
AT erisasmwaka stakeholdersperspectivesontheethicalconsiderationsforreturningindividualpharmacogenomicsresearchresultstopeoplelivingwithhiv