Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique

Background: The diagnosis of low-grade infections of endoprostheses is challenging. There are still no unified guidelines for standardised diagnostic approaches, recommendations are categorised into major and minor criteria. Additional histopathological samples might sustain the diagnosis. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Enz, Johanna Becker, Philipp Warnke, Friedrich Prall, Christoph Lutter, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Annett Klinder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3364
_version_ 1797550425050710016
author Andreas Enz
Johanna Becker
Philipp Warnke
Friedrich Prall
Christoph Lutter
Wolfram Mittelmeier
Annett Klinder
author_facet Andreas Enz
Johanna Becker
Philipp Warnke
Friedrich Prall
Christoph Lutter
Wolfram Mittelmeier
Annett Klinder
author_sort Andreas Enz
collection DOAJ
description Background: The diagnosis of low-grade infections of endoprostheses is challenging. There are still no unified guidelines for standardised diagnostic approaches, recommendations are categorised into major and minor criteria. Additional histopathological samples might sustain the diagnosis. However, ambulatory preoperative biopsy collection is not widespread. Method: 102 patients with hip or knee endoprosthesis and suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were examined by arthrocentesis with microbiological sample and histopathological punch biopsy. The data were retrospectively analysed for diagnosis concordance. Results: Preoperative microbiology compared to intraoperative results was positive in 51.9% (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 97.3%). In comparison of preoperative biopsy to intraoperative diagnostic results 51.9% cases were positive (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 100.0%). The combination of preoperative biopsy and microbiology in comparison to intraoperative results was positive in 70.4% of the cases (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity 97.3%). Conclusion: The diagnosis of PJI is complex. One single method to reliably detect an infection is currently not available. With the present method histopathological samples might be obtained quickly, easily and safely for the preoperative detection of PJI. A combination of microbiological and histopathological sampling increases the sensitivity up to 18.5% to detect periprosthetic infection.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:29:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f27b2429df7c4581aec145667d1918df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:29:06Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f27b2429df7c4581aec145667d1918df2023-11-20T17:50:05ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-10-01910336410.3390/jcm9103364Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching TechniqueAndreas Enz0Johanna Becker1Philipp Warnke2Friedrich Prall3Christoph Lutter4Wolfram Mittelmeier5Annett Klinder6Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, GermanyOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, GermanyInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 70, 18057 Rostock, GermanyInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Strempelstraße 14, 18057 Rostock, GermanyOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, GermanyOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, GermanyOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, GermanyBackground: The diagnosis of low-grade infections of endoprostheses is challenging. There are still no unified guidelines for standardised diagnostic approaches, recommendations are categorised into major and minor criteria. Additional histopathological samples might sustain the diagnosis. However, ambulatory preoperative biopsy collection is not widespread. Method: 102 patients with hip or knee endoprosthesis and suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were examined by arthrocentesis with microbiological sample and histopathological punch biopsy. The data were retrospectively analysed for diagnosis concordance. Results: Preoperative microbiology compared to intraoperative results was positive in 51.9% (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 97.3%). In comparison of preoperative biopsy to intraoperative diagnostic results 51.9% cases were positive (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 100.0%). The combination of preoperative biopsy and microbiology in comparison to intraoperative results was positive in 70.4% of the cases (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity 97.3%). Conclusion: The diagnosis of PJI is complex. One single method to reliably detect an infection is currently not available. With the present method histopathological samples might be obtained quickly, easily and safely for the preoperative detection of PJI. A combination of microbiological and histopathological sampling increases the sensitivity up to 18.5% to detect periprosthetic infection.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3364biopsylow gradeneosynoviumperiprosthetic membranerevision arthroplasty
spellingShingle Andreas Enz
Johanna Becker
Philipp Warnke
Friedrich Prall
Christoph Lutter
Wolfram Mittelmeier
Annett Klinder
Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique
Journal of Clinical Medicine
biopsy
low grade
neosynovium
periprosthetic membrane
revision arthroplasty
title Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique
title_full Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique
title_fullStr Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique
title_full_unstemmed Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique
title_short Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique
title_sort increased diagnostic certainty of periprosthetic joint infections by combining microbiological results with histopathological samples gained via a minimally invasive punching technique
topic biopsy
low grade
neosynovium
periprosthetic membrane
revision arthroplasty
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3364
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasenz increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique
AT johannabecker increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique
AT philippwarnke increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique
AT friedrichprall increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique
AT christophlutter increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique
AT wolframmittelmeier increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique
AT annettklinder increaseddiagnosticcertaintyofperiprostheticjointinfectionsbycombiningmicrobiologicalresultswithhistopathologicalsamplesgainedviaaminimallyinvasivepunchingtechnique