Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine
Abstract Brachyspira hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for swine in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of A...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | EFSA Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124 |
| _version_ | 1797871462334332928 |
|---|---|
| author | EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Søren Saxmose Nielsen Dominique Joseph Bicout Paolo Calistri Elisabetta Canali Julian Ashley Drewe Bruno Garin‐Bastuji José Luis Gonzales Rojas Christian Gortázar Mette Herskin Virginie Michel Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca Barbara Padalino Paolo Pasquali Helen Clare Roberts Hans Spoolder Karl Ståhl Antonio Velarde Arvo Viltrop Christoph Winckler Francesca Baldinelli Alessandro Broglia Lisa Kohnle Yves Van der Stede Julio Alvarez |
| author_facet | EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Søren Saxmose Nielsen Dominique Joseph Bicout Paolo Calistri Elisabetta Canali Julian Ashley Drewe Bruno Garin‐Bastuji José Luis Gonzales Rojas Christian Gortázar Mette Herskin Virginie Michel Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca Barbara Padalino Paolo Pasquali Helen Clare Roberts Hans Spoolder Karl Ståhl Antonio Velarde Arvo Viltrop Christoph Winckler Francesca Baldinelli Alessandro Broglia Lisa Kohnle Yves Van der Stede Julio Alvarez |
| author_sort | EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Brachyspira hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for swine in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR B. hyodysenteriae can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 3 (Categories A, B and C; 1–10%, 10–33% and 10–33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 4 and 5 (Categories D and E, 50–90% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The main animal species to be listed for AMR B. hyodysenteriae according to Article 8 criteria are pigs and some species of birds, such as chickens and ducks. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:44:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f28944ee115c46efbf0e8093a3781f44 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1831-4732 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:44:31Z |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EFSA Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-f28944ee115c46efbf0e8093a3781f442023-03-14T04:16:02ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322022-03-01203n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swineEFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)Søren Saxmose NielsenDominique Joseph BicoutPaolo CalistriElisabetta CanaliJulian Ashley DreweBruno Garin‐BastujiJosé Luis Gonzales RojasChristian GortázarMette HerskinVirginie MichelMiguel Ángel Miranda ChuecaBarbara PadalinoPaolo PasqualiHelen Clare RobertsHans SpoolderKarl StåhlAntonio VelardeArvo ViltropChristoph WincklerFrancesca BaldinelliAlessandro BrogliaLisa KohnleYves Van der StedeJulio AlvarezAbstract Brachyspira hyodysenteriae (B. hyodysenteriae) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for swine in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9, and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR B. hyodysenteriae can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 3 (Categories A, B and C; 1–10%, 10–33% and 10–33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 4 and 5 (Categories D and E, 50–90% and 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The main animal species to be listed for AMR B. hyodysenteriae according to Article 8 criteria are pigs and some species of birds, such as chickens and ducks.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124antimicrobial resistanceBrachyspira hyodysenteriaeAnimal Health Lawlistingcategorisationimpact |
| spellingShingle | EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Søren Saxmose Nielsen Dominique Joseph Bicout Paolo Calistri Elisabetta Canali Julian Ashley Drewe Bruno Garin‐Bastuji José Luis Gonzales Rojas Christian Gortázar Mette Herskin Virginie Michel Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca Barbara Padalino Paolo Pasquali Helen Clare Roberts Hans Spoolder Karl Ståhl Antonio Velarde Arvo Viltrop Christoph Winckler Francesca Baldinelli Alessandro Broglia Lisa Kohnle Yves Van der Stede Julio Alvarez Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine EFSA Journal antimicrobial resistance Brachyspira hyodysenteriae Animal Health Law listing categorisation impact |
| title | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
| title_full | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
| title_fullStr | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
| title_short | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
| title_sort | assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the animal health law regulation eu no 2016 429 antimicrobial resistant brachyspira hyodysenteriae in swine |
| topic | antimicrobial resistance Brachyspira hyodysenteriae Animal Health Law listing categorisation impact |
| url | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7124 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT efsapanelonanimalhealthandwelfareahaw assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT sørensaxmosenielsen assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT dominiquejosephbicout assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT paolocalistri assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT elisabettacanali assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT julianashleydrewe assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT brunogarinbastuji assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT joseluisgonzalesrojas assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT christiangortazar assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT metteherskin assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT virginiemichel assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT miguelangelmirandachueca assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT barbarapadalino assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT paolopasquali assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT helenclareroberts assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT hansspoolder assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT karlstahl assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT antoniovelarde assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT arvoviltrop assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT christophwinckler assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT francescabaldinelli assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT alessandrobroglia assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT lisakohnle assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT yvesvanderstede assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine AT julioalvarez assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429antimicrobialresistantbrachyspirahyodysenteriaeinswine |