Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions

Background: Expert consensus recommends treatment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible prostate cancer (PCa). Outcomes of partial-gland ablation (PGA) for MRI-invisible PCa remain unknown. Objective: To compare recurrence-free survival, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alec Zhu, Sofia Gereta, Tenny R. Zhang, Judith Stangl-Kremser, Richard M. Mora, Daniel J.A. Margolis, Jim C. Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:European Urology Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323002197
_version_ 1797792636821569536
author Alec Zhu
Sofia Gereta
Tenny R. Zhang
Judith Stangl-Kremser
Richard M. Mora
Daniel J.A. Margolis
Jim C. Hu
author_facet Alec Zhu
Sofia Gereta
Tenny R. Zhang
Judith Stangl-Kremser
Richard M. Mora
Daniel J.A. Margolis
Jim C. Hu
author_sort Alec Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Expert consensus recommends treatment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible prostate cancer (PCa). Outcomes of partial-gland ablation (PGA) for MRI-invisible PCa remain unknown. Objective: To compare recurrence-free survival, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes following cryoablation of MRI-visible vs invisible PCa. Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed data for 75 men who underwent cryoablation therapy between January 2017 and January 2022. PCa identified on MRI-targeted and/or adjacent systematic biopsy cores was defined as MRI-visible, whereas PCa identified on systematic biopsy beyond the targeted zone was defined as MRI-invisible. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was recurrence at 12 mo after PGA, defined as the presence of clinically significant PCa (grade group [GG] ≥2) on surveillance biopsy. Adverse events were captured using the Clavien-Dindo classification and HRQoL was captured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) tool. Results and limitations: Of the 58 men treated for MRI-visible and 17 treated for MRI-invisible lesions, 51 (88%) and 16 (94%), respectively, had at least one surveillance biopsy performed. There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, body mass index, biopsy GG, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, or treatment extent between the MRI-visible and MRI-invisible groups. Median follow-up was 44 mo (interquartile range 17–54) and did not significantly differ between the groups. The recurrence rate at 12 mo did not significantly differ between the groups (MRI-visible 39%, MRI-invisible 19%; p = 0.2), and log-rank survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.15). Adverse event rates did not significantly differ (MRI-visible 29%, MRI-invisible 53%; p = 0.092); no man in the MRI-visible group had a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complication, while one subject in the MRI-invisible group had a Clavien-Dindo grade III complication. Median EPIC-CP urinary and sexual function scores were similar for the two groups at baseline and at 12 mo after PGA. Study limitations include the retrospective design and small sample size. Conclusions: We observed similar cancer control, adverse event, and HRQoL outcomes for MRI-visible versus MRI-invisible PCa in the first comparison of partial-gland cryoablation. Longer follow-up and external validation of our findings are needed to inform patient selection for PGA for MRI-invisible PCa. Patient summary: Patients with prostate cancer lesions that are not visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans who undergo partial gland ablation may have similar treatment outcomes compared to patients with cancer lesions that are visible on MRI.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:35:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f28fa987006c4c81a110e7937a9836cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-1683
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:35:48Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Urology Open Science
spelling doaj.art-f28fa987006c4c81a110e7937a9836cd2023-06-29T04:14:36ZengElsevierEuropean Urology Open Science2666-16832023-07-01533845Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible LesionsAlec Zhu0Sofia Gereta1Tenny R. Zhang2Judith Stangl-Kremser3Richard M. Mora4Daniel J.A. Margolis5Jim C. Hu6Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USADell Medical School, University of Texas-Austin Austin, TX, USADepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USADepartment of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Corresponding author. Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA. Tel. +1 646 9629600; Fax: + 646 9620715.Background: Expert consensus recommends treatment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible prostate cancer (PCa). Outcomes of partial-gland ablation (PGA) for MRI-invisible PCa remain unknown. Objective: To compare recurrence-free survival, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes following cryoablation of MRI-visible vs invisible PCa. Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed data for 75 men who underwent cryoablation therapy between January 2017 and January 2022. PCa identified on MRI-targeted and/or adjacent systematic biopsy cores was defined as MRI-visible, whereas PCa identified on systematic biopsy beyond the targeted zone was defined as MRI-invisible. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was recurrence at 12 mo after PGA, defined as the presence of clinically significant PCa (grade group [GG] ≥2) on surveillance biopsy. Adverse events were captured using the Clavien-Dindo classification and HRQoL was captured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) tool. Results and limitations: Of the 58 men treated for MRI-visible and 17 treated for MRI-invisible lesions, 51 (88%) and 16 (94%), respectively, had at least one surveillance biopsy performed. There were no statistically significant differences in age, race, body mass index, biopsy GG, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, or treatment extent between the MRI-visible and MRI-invisible groups. Median follow-up was 44 mo (interquartile range 17–54) and did not significantly differ between the groups. The recurrence rate at 12 mo did not significantly differ between the groups (MRI-visible 39%, MRI-invisible 19%; p = 0.2), and log-rank survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.15). Adverse event rates did not significantly differ (MRI-visible 29%, MRI-invisible 53%; p = 0.092); no man in the MRI-visible group had a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complication, while one subject in the MRI-invisible group had a Clavien-Dindo grade III complication. Median EPIC-CP urinary and sexual function scores were similar for the two groups at baseline and at 12 mo after PGA. Study limitations include the retrospective design and small sample size. Conclusions: We observed similar cancer control, adverse event, and HRQoL outcomes for MRI-visible versus MRI-invisible PCa in the first comparison of partial-gland cryoablation. Longer follow-up and external validation of our findings are needed to inform patient selection for PGA for MRI-invisible PCa. Patient summary: Patients with prostate cancer lesions that are not visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans who undergo partial gland ablation may have similar treatment outcomes compared to patients with cancer lesions that are visible on MRI.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323002197Prostatic neoplasmsCryosurgeryTreatment failure
spellingShingle Alec Zhu
Sofia Gereta
Tenny R. Zhang
Judith Stangl-Kremser
Richard M. Mora
Daniel J.A. Margolis
Jim C. Hu
Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions
European Urology Open Science
Prostatic neoplasms
Cryosurgery
Treatment failure
title Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions
title_full Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions
title_fullStr Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions
title_short Partial-gland Cryoablation Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-visible and MRI-invisible Lesions
title_sort partial gland cryoablation outcomes for localized prostate cancer in patients with magnetic resonance imaging mri visible and mri invisible lesions
topic Prostatic neoplasms
Cryosurgery
Treatment failure
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323002197
work_keys_str_mv AT aleczhu partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions
AT sofiagereta partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions
AT tennyrzhang partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions
AT judithstanglkremser partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions
AT richardmmora partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions
AT danieljamargolis partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions
AT jimchu partialglandcryoablationoutcomesforlocalizedprostatecancerinpatientswithmagneticresonanceimagingmrivisibleandmriinvisiblelesions