SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)

This study is concerned with discourse semantic analysis of three selected victory speeches of the US Presidents. It was conducted for and aimed at describing, explaining, and analyzing the field, the interpersonal meaning (tenor) the mode of the texts, the schematic structure, and the unity of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hieronimus Canggung Darong, Sebastianus - Menggo, Maria Olga Jelimun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang 2022-09-01
Series:Nyimak: Journal of Communication
Online Access:https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/nyimak/article/view/6608
_version_ 1811179877973360640
author Hieronimus Canggung Darong
Sebastianus - Menggo
Maria Olga Jelimun
author_facet Hieronimus Canggung Darong
Sebastianus - Menggo
Maria Olga Jelimun
author_sort Hieronimus Canggung Darong
collection DOAJ
description This study is concerned with discourse semantic analysis of three selected victory speeches of the US Presidents. It was conducted for and aimed at describing, explaining, and analyzing the field, the interpersonal meaning (tenor) the mode of the texts, the schematic structure, and the unity of the texts by using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) as the basis of analysis. The speech texts were changed into clauses and then analyzed. The results of the analysis found that the register category of field is similar. The transitivity patterns of the grammar, reference, and lexical string analysis share common features that is the realization of experiential action done by the speaker and audience for the progress of America. The interpersonal meaning of the texts is slightly different, in which, Joe Biden and Barack Obama established an intimate relationship with the audience, while in Donald trump’s text, the sense of intimacy and the distance with the audience are far. Since the nominal groups used were simple, the mode of all texts belongs to the spoken mode. Besides, In terms of schematic structure, the texts were constructed similarly consisting of an introduction, body, and conclusion. Finally, this study also found that the anaphoric reference which was predominantly used, a good pattern of conjunction relations, and lexical relations between lexical items appearing cross clauses categorize the texts as being highly cohesive.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:42:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2937a8bb7584067bc22de8dabf39ae2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2580-3808
2580-3832
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:42:02Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
record_format Article
series Nyimak: Journal of Communication
spelling doaj.art-f2937a8bb7584067bc22de8dabf39ae22022-12-22T04:39:31ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah TangerangNyimak: Journal of Communication2580-38082580-38322022-09-016210.31000/nyimak.v6i2.66083296SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)Hieronimus Canggung Darong0Sebastianus - Menggo1Maria Olga Jelimun2Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus RutengUniversitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus RutengUniversitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus RutengThis study is concerned with discourse semantic analysis of three selected victory speeches of the US Presidents. It was conducted for and aimed at describing, explaining, and analyzing the field, the interpersonal meaning (tenor) the mode of the texts, the schematic structure, and the unity of the texts by using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) as the basis of analysis. The speech texts were changed into clauses and then analyzed. The results of the analysis found that the register category of field is similar. The transitivity patterns of the grammar, reference, and lexical string analysis share common features that is the realization of experiential action done by the speaker and audience for the progress of America. The interpersonal meaning of the texts is slightly different, in which, Joe Biden and Barack Obama established an intimate relationship with the audience, while in Donald trump’s text, the sense of intimacy and the distance with the audience are far. Since the nominal groups used were simple, the mode of all texts belongs to the spoken mode. Besides, In terms of schematic structure, the texts were constructed similarly consisting of an introduction, body, and conclusion. Finally, this study also found that the anaphoric reference which was predominantly used, a good pattern of conjunction relations, and lexical relations between lexical items appearing cross clauses categorize the texts as being highly cohesive.https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/nyimak/article/view/6608
spellingShingle Hieronimus Canggung Darong
Sebastianus - Menggo
Maria Olga Jelimun
SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)
Nyimak: Journal of Communication
title SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)
title_full SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)
title_fullStr SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)
title_full_unstemmed SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)
title_short SPEECH ANALYSIS (DISCOURSE SEMANTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS THEORY)
title_sort speech analysis discourse semantic analysis based on systemic functional linguistics theory
url https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/nyimak/article/view/6608
work_keys_str_mv AT hieronimuscanggungdarong speechanalysisdiscoursesemanticanalysisbasedonsystemicfunctionallinguisticstheory
AT sebastianusmenggo speechanalysisdiscoursesemanticanalysisbasedonsystemicfunctionallinguisticstheory
AT mariaolgajelimun speechanalysisdiscoursesemanticanalysisbasedonsystemicfunctionallinguisticstheory