The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions

The properties of the segregated flow model (SFM), which considers split intestinal flow patterns perfusing an active enterocyte region that houses enzymes and transporters (<20% of the total intestinal blood flow) and an inactive serosal region (>80%), were compared to those of the traditiona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Sandy Pang, H. Benson Peng, Keumhan Noh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/4/312
_version_ 1797571780505763840
author K. Sandy Pang
H. Benson Peng
Keumhan Noh
author_facet K. Sandy Pang
H. Benson Peng
Keumhan Noh
author_sort K. Sandy Pang
collection DOAJ
description The properties of the segregated flow model (SFM), which considers split intestinal flow patterns perfusing an active enterocyte region that houses enzymes and transporters (<20% of the total intestinal blood flow) and an inactive serosal region (>80%), were compared to those of the traditional model (TM), wherein 100% of the flow perfuses the non-segregated intestine tissue. The appropriateness of the SFM model is important in terms of drug absorption and intestinal and liver drug metabolism. Model behaviors were examined with respect to intestinally (M1) versus hepatically (M2) formed metabolites and the availabilities in the intestine (F<sub>I</sub>) and liver (F<sub>H</sub>) and the route of drug administration. The %contribution of the intestine to total first-pass metabolism bears a reciprocal relation to that for the liver, since the intestine, a gateway tissue, regulates the flow of substrate to the liver. The SFM predicts the highest and lowest M1 formed with oral (po) and intravenous (iv) dosing, respectively, whereas the extent of M1 formation is similar for the drug administered po or iv according to the TM, and these values sit intermediate those of the SFM. The SFM is significant, as this drug metabolism model explains route-dependent intestinal metabolism, describing a higher extent of intestinal metabolism with po versus the much reduced or absence of intestinal metabolism with iv dosing. A similar pattern exists for drug–drug interactions (DDIs). The inhibitor or inducer exerts its greatest effect on victim drugs when both inhibitor/inducer and drug are given po. With po dosing, more drug or inhibitor/inducer is brought into the intestine for DDIs. The bypass of flow and drug to the enterocyte region of the intestine after intravenous administration adds complications to in vitro–in vivo extrapolations (IVIVE).
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:45:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2951a68d3ea45c1b041c37fad74acf3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4923
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:45:28Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceutics
spelling doaj.art-f2951a68d3ea45c1b041c37fad74acf32023-11-19T20:24:00ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232020-04-0112431210.3390/pharmaceutics12040312The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug InteractionsK. Sandy Pang0H. Benson Peng1Keumhan Noh2Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, CanadaLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, CanadaLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, CanadaThe properties of the segregated flow model (SFM), which considers split intestinal flow patterns perfusing an active enterocyte region that houses enzymes and transporters (<20% of the total intestinal blood flow) and an inactive serosal region (>80%), were compared to those of the traditional model (TM), wherein 100% of the flow perfuses the non-segregated intestine tissue. The appropriateness of the SFM model is important in terms of drug absorption and intestinal and liver drug metabolism. Model behaviors were examined with respect to intestinally (M1) versus hepatically (M2) formed metabolites and the availabilities in the intestine (F<sub>I</sub>) and liver (F<sub>H</sub>) and the route of drug administration. The %contribution of the intestine to total first-pass metabolism bears a reciprocal relation to that for the liver, since the intestine, a gateway tissue, regulates the flow of substrate to the liver. The SFM predicts the highest and lowest M1 formed with oral (po) and intravenous (iv) dosing, respectively, whereas the extent of M1 formation is similar for the drug administered po or iv according to the TM, and these values sit intermediate those of the SFM. The SFM is significant, as this drug metabolism model explains route-dependent intestinal metabolism, describing a higher extent of intestinal metabolism with po versus the much reduced or absence of intestinal metabolism with iv dosing. A similar pattern exists for drug–drug interactions (DDIs). The inhibitor or inducer exerts its greatest effect on victim drugs when both inhibitor/inducer and drug are given po. With po dosing, more drug or inhibitor/inducer is brought into the intestine for DDIs. The bypass of flow and drug to the enterocyte region of the intestine after intravenous administration adds complications to in vitro–in vivo extrapolations (IVIVE).https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/4/312segregated flow intestinal model (SFM)traditional model (TM)route-dependent intestinal metabolismfirst-pass effectdrug-drug interactionsDDI
spellingShingle K. Sandy Pang
H. Benson Peng
Keumhan Noh
The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions
Pharmaceutics
segregated flow intestinal model (SFM)
traditional model (TM)
route-dependent intestinal metabolism
first-pass effect
drug-drug interactions
DDI
title The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions
title_full The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions
title_fullStr The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions
title_full_unstemmed The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions
title_short The Segregated Intestinal Flow Model (SFM) for Drug Absorption and Drug Metabolism: Implications on Intestinal and Liver Metabolism and Drug–Drug Interactions
title_sort segregated intestinal flow model sfm for drug absorption and drug metabolism implications on intestinal and liver metabolism and drug drug interactions
topic segregated flow intestinal model (SFM)
traditional model (TM)
route-dependent intestinal metabolism
first-pass effect
drug-drug interactions
DDI
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/12/4/312
work_keys_str_mv AT ksandypang thesegregatedintestinalflowmodelsfmfordrugabsorptionanddrugmetabolismimplicationsonintestinalandlivermetabolismanddrugdruginteractions
AT hbensonpeng thesegregatedintestinalflowmodelsfmfordrugabsorptionanddrugmetabolismimplicationsonintestinalandlivermetabolismanddrugdruginteractions
AT keumhannoh thesegregatedintestinalflowmodelsfmfordrugabsorptionanddrugmetabolismimplicationsonintestinalandlivermetabolismanddrugdruginteractions
AT ksandypang segregatedintestinalflowmodelsfmfordrugabsorptionanddrugmetabolismimplicationsonintestinalandlivermetabolismanddrugdruginteractions
AT hbensonpeng segregatedintestinalflowmodelsfmfordrugabsorptionanddrugmetabolismimplicationsonintestinalandlivermetabolismanddrugdruginteractions
AT keumhannoh segregatedintestinalflowmodelsfmfordrugabsorptionanddrugmetabolismimplicationsonintestinalandlivermetabolismanddrugdruginteractions