Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures

Abstract Background Lateral compression type1 (LC-1) fragility fractures are a common, painful injury in older adults resulting in reduced mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing with the growing older adult population. The current standard of care is non-surgical management; howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Cook, Joanne Laycock, Mehool Acharya, Michael Ross Backhouse, Belen Corbacho, Laura Doherty, Daren Forward, Catherine Hewitt, Catherine Hilton, Peter Hull, Jamila Kassam, Camila Maturana, Catriona Mcdaid, Jenny Roche, Dhanupriya Sivapathasuntharam, David Torgerson, Peter Bates
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07063-5
_version_ 1811171598687797248
author Elizabeth Cook
Joanne Laycock
Mehool Acharya
Michael Ross Backhouse
Belen Corbacho
Laura Doherty
Daren Forward
Catherine Hewitt
Catherine Hilton
Peter Hull
Jamila Kassam
Camila Maturana
Catriona Mcdaid
Jenny Roche
Dhanupriya Sivapathasuntharam
David Torgerson
Peter Bates
author_facet Elizabeth Cook
Joanne Laycock
Mehool Acharya
Michael Ross Backhouse
Belen Corbacho
Laura Doherty
Daren Forward
Catherine Hewitt
Catherine Hilton
Peter Hull
Jamila Kassam
Camila Maturana
Catriona Mcdaid
Jenny Roche
Dhanupriya Sivapathasuntharam
David Torgerson
Peter Bates
author_sort Elizabeth Cook
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Lateral compression type1 (LC-1) fragility fractures are a common, painful injury in older adults resulting in reduced mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing with the growing older adult population. The current standard of care is non-surgical management; however, patients with this injury are at risk of long-term immobility and related complications. INFIX is a pelvic fixation device used in younger patients with high-energy fractures. The device is fitted via a percutaneous technique with no external pin sites and has good purchase even in osteoporotic bone. It therefore has the potential to be well tolerated in patients with LC-1 fragility fractures. INFIX could improve patients’ ability to mobilise and reduce the risk of immobility-related complications. However, there is a risk of complications related to surgery, and robust evidence is required on patient outcomes. This study will investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation with INFIX compared to non-surgical management of LC-1 fragility fractures in older adults. Methods A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of 600 patients allocated 1:1 to non-surgical management or INFIX surgery. The study will have a 12-month internal pilot to assess recruitment and trial feasibility. The primary outcome will be the patient quality of life over 6 months, measured by the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L. The secondary outcomes will include physical function, mental health, pain, delirium, imaging assessment, resource use, and complications. Discussion The L1FE study aims to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical management of people aged 60 years and older with LC-1 fragility fractures. The trial is sufficiently powered and rigorously designed to inform future clinical and patient decision-making and allocation of NHS resources. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN16478561. Registered on 8 April 2019
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:16:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f29621a438cc40f29dd3cf0726972e04
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:16:45Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-f29621a438cc40f29dd3cf0726972e042023-02-05T12:22:53ZengBMCTrials1745-62152023-02-0124111610.1186/s13063-022-07063-5Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fracturesElizabeth Cook0Joanne Laycock1Mehool Acharya2Michael Ross Backhouse3Belen Corbacho4Laura Doherty5Daren Forward6Catherine Hewitt7Catherine Hilton8Peter Hull9Jamila Kassam10Camila Maturana11Catriona Mcdaid12Jenny Roche13Dhanupriya Sivapathasuntharam14David Torgerson15Peter Bates16York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkPelvic and Acetabular Reconstruction Unit, Southmead HospitalYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkNottingham University HospitalsYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkBart’s Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBart’s Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkBart’s Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of YorkBart’s Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalAbstract Background Lateral compression type1 (LC-1) fragility fractures are a common, painful injury in older adults resulting in reduced mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing with the growing older adult population. The current standard of care is non-surgical management; however, patients with this injury are at risk of long-term immobility and related complications. INFIX is a pelvic fixation device used in younger patients with high-energy fractures. The device is fitted via a percutaneous technique with no external pin sites and has good purchase even in osteoporotic bone. It therefore has the potential to be well tolerated in patients with LC-1 fragility fractures. INFIX could improve patients’ ability to mobilise and reduce the risk of immobility-related complications. However, there is a risk of complications related to surgery, and robust evidence is required on patient outcomes. This study will investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation with INFIX compared to non-surgical management of LC-1 fragility fractures in older adults. Methods A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of 600 patients allocated 1:1 to non-surgical management or INFIX surgery. The study will have a 12-month internal pilot to assess recruitment and trial feasibility. The primary outcome will be the patient quality of life over 6 months, measured by the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L. The secondary outcomes will include physical function, mental health, pain, delirium, imaging assessment, resource use, and complications. Discussion The L1FE study aims to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical management of people aged 60 years and older with LC-1 fragility fractures. The trial is sufficiently powered and rigorously designed to inform future clinical and patient decision-making and allocation of NHS resources. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry ISRCTN16478561. Registered on 8 April 2019https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07063-5INFIX surgeryLateral compression type 1LC-1Pelvic fracture fixationElderly patientsOlder adults
spellingShingle Elizabeth Cook
Joanne Laycock
Mehool Acharya
Michael Ross Backhouse
Belen Corbacho
Laura Doherty
Daren Forward
Catherine Hewitt
Catherine Hilton
Peter Hull
Jamila Kassam
Camila Maturana
Catriona Mcdaid
Jenny Roche
Dhanupriya Sivapathasuntharam
David Torgerson
Peter Bates
Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures
Trials
INFIX surgery
Lateral compression type 1
LC-1
Pelvic fracture fixation
Elderly patients
Older adults
title Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures
title_full Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures
title_fullStr Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures
title_full_unstemmed Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures
title_short Lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly (L1FE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (with internal pilot) comparing the effects of INFIX surgery and non-surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) fragility fractures
title_sort lateral compression type 1 fracture fixation in the elderly l1fe study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal pilot comparing the effects of infix surgery and non surgical management for treating patients with lateral compression type 1 lc 1 fragility fractures
topic INFIX surgery
Lateral compression type 1
LC-1
Pelvic fracture fixation
Elderly patients
Older adults
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07063-5
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethcook lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT joannelaycock lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT mehoolacharya lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT michaelrossbackhouse lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT belencorbacho lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT lauradoherty lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT darenforward lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT catherinehewitt lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT catherinehilton lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT peterhull lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT jamilakassam lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT camilamaturana lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT catrionamcdaid lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT jennyroche lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT dhanupriyasivapathasuntharam lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT davidtorgerson lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures
AT peterbates lateralcompressiontype1fracturefixationintheelderlyl1festudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalpilotcomparingtheeffectsofinfixsurgeryandnonsurgicalmanagementfortreatingpatientswithlateralcompressiontype1lc1fragilityfractures