Die Genesung des Ostens
Around 1900, ordinary Germans and politicians in Berlin regarded Germany’s Eastern frontier as economically, culturally and politically jeop-ardised and exposed to the constant threat of Polonisation. It thus seemed necessary to strengthen the functionality of the borderland and its connection with...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
StudienVerlag
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5304 |
| _version_ | 1819225120905887744 |
|---|---|
| author | Justyna Turkowska |
| author_facet | Justyna Turkowska |
| author_sort | Justyna Turkowska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Around 1900, ordinary Germans and politicians in Berlin regarded Germany’s Eastern frontier as economically, culturally and politically jeop-ardised and exposed to the constant threat of Polonisation. It thus seemed necessary to strengthen the functionality of the borderland and its connection with the centre. After purely economic incentives failed to achieve these objectives, doing little for the deperipherisation of the region, it became apparent that different measures were required. A territorial population policy was mobilised. Its most consistent tool was medical measures to control, support and govern the local population, and thus steer regional development. These measures were introduced to meet some concrete political requirements, but also for the ideological purpose of “Germanising” the region. By examining the emergence of the medical infrastructure in the Prussian eastern borderland, namely the Province of Posen, this article focuses on attempts of the government in Berlin to improve the peripheral economic, cultural and societal status of the borderland through the enforcement of biopolitical measures. It further links the regional inner strife to its own peripheral and unstable situation. The contribution furthermore examines local realisa-tions of ideas formulated in Berlin, their consequences and the processes that they set in motion. Local visions of the extent to which inner-German peripheralisation and inner-regional marginalisation was a disadvantage or an advantage challenged some key ideas of the German government. The case of the Province of Posen also shows that the reduction of asymmetries was not always desired and that locality, as opposed to centrality, was decisive for biopolitical de- and (re-)peripheralisation processes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T10:04:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f296afb0f24e432181fd9b73b8b1248a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1016-765X 2707-966X |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T10:04:33Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | StudienVerlag |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
| spelling | doaj.art-f296afb0f24e432181fd9b73b8b1248a2022-12-21T17:51:08ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X2020-12-0131210.25365/oezg-2020-31-2-6Die Genesung des OstensJustyna Turkowska0School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of EdinburghAround 1900, ordinary Germans and politicians in Berlin regarded Germany’s Eastern frontier as economically, culturally and politically jeop-ardised and exposed to the constant threat of Polonisation. It thus seemed necessary to strengthen the functionality of the borderland and its connection with the centre. After purely economic incentives failed to achieve these objectives, doing little for the deperipherisation of the region, it became apparent that different measures were required. A territorial population policy was mobilised. Its most consistent tool was medical measures to control, support and govern the local population, and thus steer regional development. These measures were introduced to meet some concrete political requirements, but also for the ideological purpose of “Germanising” the region. By examining the emergence of the medical infrastructure in the Prussian eastern borderland, namely the Province of Posen, this article focuses on attempts of the government in Berlin to improve the peripheral economic, cultural and societal status of the borderland through the enforcement of biopolitical measures. It further links the regional inner strife to its own peripheral and unstable situation. The contribution furthermore examines local realisa-tions of ideas formulated in Berlin, their consequences and the processes that they set in motion. Local visions of the extent to which inner-German peripheralisation and inner-regional marginalisation was a disadvantage or an advantage challenged some key ideas of the German government. The case of the Province of Posen also shows that the reduction of asymmetries was not always desired and that locality, as opposed to centrality, was decisive for biopolitical de- and (re-)peripheralisation processes.https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5304biopoliticsGermany’s Eastern frontierPrussian Ostmarkpublic healthmodernisationinternal peripheries |
| spellingShingle | Justyna Turkowska Die Genesung des Ostens Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften biopolitics Germany’s Eastern frontier Prussian Ostmark public health modernisation internal peripheries |
| title | Die Genesung des Ostens |
| title_full | Die Genesung des Ostens |
| title_fullStr | Die Genesung des Ostens |
| title_full_unstemmed | Die Genesung des Ostens |
| title_short | Die Genesung des Ostens |
| title_sort | die genesung des ostens |
| topic | biopolitics Germany’s Eastern frontier Prussian Ostmark public health modernisation internal peripheries |
| url | https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/5304 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT justynaturkowska diegenesungdesostens |