Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence

This article deals with the analysis of neo-mythological and pantheistic subjects in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and Knut Hamsun. The analytical comparison of Nietzsche’s philosophical concepts and Hamsun’s literary psychologism is poised to find an underlying understanding of human nature at t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria P. Matyushova, Alexandra S. Perepechina, Dmitry V. Mamchenkov
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2022-06-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/viewFile/31374/20852
_version_ 1818235222733357056
author Maria P. Matyushova
Alexandra S. Perepechina
Dmitry V. Mamchenkov
author_facet Maria P. Matyushova
Alexandra S. Perepechina
Dmitry V. Mamchenkov
author_sort Maria P. Matyushova
collection DOAJ
description This article deals with the analysis of neo-mythological and pantheistic subjects in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and Knut Hamsun. The analytical comparison of Nietzsche’s philosophical concepts and Hamsun’s literary psychologism is poised to find an underlying understanding of human nature at the confluence of ethics and aesthetics - of goods and beauty, of evil and ugly. A precise definition of the aesthetic categories “Apollonian” and “Dionysian” is carried out based on Nietzsche’s work “The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music”. The relevance of the Dionysian culture’s phenomena is based on the Nietzschean belief in an Übermensch within the modern mindset. The concept of “Dionysus” finds its continuation in the postmodern philosophy of Georges Bataille and Maurice Blanchot, in such archaic emotional and aesthetic aspects of human essence as violence and sacrifice understood in an extremely abstract sense. The authors stress that modern culture’s interest in violence and sacrifice is rooted in Nietzsche’s idea of Dionysius in the meaning of one of the beginnings of any segment of European culture. The foundations for overcoming postmodernism in the 21st century and the subsequent development of aesthetic views can be found in an attempt to revise the foundation of European culture through rethinking the concept of Übermensch-Zarathustra-Dionysus.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T11:50:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f29c9b35444e44a398c5f03bfea6cc99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-2302
2408-8900
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-12T11:50:33Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN Journal of Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-f29c9b35444e44a398c5f03bfea6cc992022-12-22T00:25:21ZdeuPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Philosophy2313-23022408-89002022-06-0126241842610.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-2-418-42620782Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred ViolenceMaria P. Matyushova0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-8412Alexandra S. Perepechina1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3226-1040Dmitry V. Mamchenkov2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-2232Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)This article deals with the analysis of neo-mythological and pantheistic subjects in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche and Knut Hamsun. The analytical comparison of Nietzsche’s philosophical concepts and Hamsun’s literary psychologism is poised to find an underlying understanding of human nature at the confluence of ethics and aesthetics - of goods and beauty, of evil and ugly. A precise definition of the aesthetic categories “Apollonian” and “Dionysian” is carried out based on Nietzsche’s work “The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music”. The relevance of the Dionysian culture’s phenomena is based on the Nietzschean belief in an Übermensch within the modern mindset. The concept of “Dionysus” finds its continuation in the postmodern philosophy of Georges Bataille and Maurice Blanchot, in such archaic emotional and aesthetic aspects of human essence as violence and sacrifice understood in an extremely abstract sense. The authors stress that modern culture’s interest in violence and sacrifice is rooted in Nietzsche’s idea of Dionysius in the meaning of one of the beginnings of any segment of European culture. The foundations for overcoming postmodernism in the 21st century and the subsequent development of aesthetic views can be found in an attempt to revise the foundation of European culture through rethinking the concept of Übermensch-Zarathustra-Dionysus.https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/viewFile/31374/20852nietzschehamsunbatailleblanchotaestheticsapolloniandionysianneo-mythologypantheism
spellingShingle Maria P. Matyushova
Alexandra S. Perepechina
Dmitry V. Mamchenkov
Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
nietzsche
hamsun
bataille
blanchot
aesthetics
apollonian
dionysian
neo-mythology
pantheism
title Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence
title_full Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence
title_fullStr Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence
title_full_unstemmed Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence
title_short Nietzsche, Hamsun, and Sacred Violence
title_sort nietzsche hamsun and sacred violence
topic nietzsche
hamsun
bataille
blanchot
aesthetics
apollonian
dionysian
neo-mythology
pantheism
url https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/viewFile/31374/20852
work_keys_str_mv AT mariapmatyushova nietzschehamsunandsacredviolence
AT alexandrasperepechina nietzschehamsunandsacredviolence
AT dmitryvmamchenkov nietzschehamsunandsacredviolence