Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection.
Objective Accurate estimates of survival guide decision-making for patients and oncologists. Advances in the capacity to measure complex tumour biology and patient factors allow for concurrent consideration of clinical, pathological, molecular, and biological markers for prognostication. Clinical p...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Swansea University
2022-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Population Data Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ijpds.org/article/view/2097 |
_version_ | 1827615052836896768 |
---|---|
author | Lyndsay Harrison Alyson Mahar Natalie Coburn Randy Boyes Michael Pugliese Carolyn Compton Gail Darling Laura Davis Kathleen Decker Vaibhav Gupta Biniam Kidane Douglas Manuel Jolie Ringash Donna Turner Amy Hsu |
author_facet | Lyndsay Harrison Alyson Mahar Natalie Coburn Randy Boyes Michael Pugliese Carolyn Compton Gail Darling Laura Davis Kathleen Decker Vaibhav Gupta Biniam Kidane Douglas Manuel Jolie Ringash Donna Turner Amy Hsu |
author_sort | Lyndsay Harrison |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Objective
Accurate estimates of survival guide decision-making for patients and oncologists. Advances in the capacity to measure complex tumour biology and patient factors allow for concurrent consideration of clinical, pathological, molecular, and biological markers for prognostication. Clinical prediction tools are a mechanism to combine and personalize these increasingly large amounts of complex information for prognostication.
Approach
We describe the process of linking routinely collected health data, cancer registry, and pathology report data in two provinces to develop (Ontario, Canada) and validate (Manitoba, Canada) a clinical prediction tool in esophageal cancer. We compared the performance of a base model restricted to patient and disease characteristics available prior to surgical resection (e.g., age, sex, histology, comorbidities), and a more complex model including pathology specimen details (e.g., tumour stage). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to predict death at three years following resection. Internal and external validity was assessed using overall calibration and optimism corrected c-statistics. Equity was assessed through calibration in predefined patient subgroups.
Results
2124 patients who underwent surgical resection for esophageal cancer between May 1, 2004 and June 30, 2016 for whom a pathology record was available were included in the study cohort. Median age was 66, with 80% males and 85% adenocarcinomas. Survival data were available until March 31, 2020. The model with pathology data had superior discrimination and calibration (calibration slope of 1.02 and intercept -0.01, and optimism-corrected c-statistic 0.77), compared to the base model (calibration slope of 0.95, intercept 0.02, and c-statistic 0.60). External validation is ongoing.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that prediction models for cancer prognosis built solely on data from health administrative databases may be unreliable. The addition of high-quality pathology report data from electronic medical records or population-based cancer registries is necessary for accurate estimation. Our work provides a framework for combining administrative and clinical data which could be applied to the development of other clinical prediction models.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T09:04:38Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f2a2e1b6cc4b406396c8971e278a3255 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2399-4908 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T09:04:38Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | Swansea University |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Population Data Science |
spelling | doaj.art-f2a2e1b6cc4b406396c8971e278a32552023-12-02T10:47:20ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082022-08-017310.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2097Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection.Lyndsay Harrison0Alyson Mahar1Natalie Coburn2Randy Boyes3Michael Pugliese4Carolyn Compton5Gail Darling6Laura Davis7Kathleen Decker8Vaibhav Gupta9Biniam Kidane10Douglas Manuel11Jolie Ringash12Donna Turner13Amy Hsu14University of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba; ICESUniversity of Toronto; ICESQueen's UniversityICESArizona State UniversityDalhousie UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Ottawa; ICESUniversity of TorontoUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Ottawa; ICES Objective Accurate estimates of survival guide decision-making for patients and oncologists. Advances in the capacity to measure complex tumour biology and patient factors allow for concurrent consideration of clinical, pathological, molecular, and biological markers for prognostication. Clinical prediction tools are a mechanism to combine and personalize these increasingly large amounts of complex information for prognostication. Approach We describe the process of linking routinely collected health data, cancer registry, and pathology report data in two provinces to develop (Ontario, Canada) and validate (Manitoba, Canada) a clinical prediction tool in esophageal cancer. We compared the performance of a base model restricted to patient and disease characteristics available prior to surgical resection (e.g., age, sex, histology, comorbidities), and a more complex model including pathology specimen details (e.g., tumour stage). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to predict death at three years following resection. Internal and external validity was assessed using overall calibration and optimism corrected c-statistics. Equity was assessed through calibration in predefined patient subgroups. Results 2124 patients who underwent surgical resection for esophageal cancer between May 1, 2004 and June 30, 2016 for whom a pathology record was available were included in the study cohort. Median age was 66, with 80% males and 85% adenocarcinomas. Survival data were available until March 31, 2020. The model with pathology data had superior discrimination and calibration (calibration slope of 1.02 and intercept -0.01, and optimism-corrected c-statistic 0.77), compared to the base model (calibration slope of 0.95, intercept 0.02, and c-statistic 0.60). External validation is ongoing. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that prediction models for cancer prognosis built solely on data from health administrative databases may be unreliable. The addition of high-quality pathology report data from electronic medical records or population-based cancer registries is necessary for accurate estimation. Our work provides a framework for combining administrative and clinical data which could be applied to the development of other clinical prediction models. https://ijpds.org/article/view/2097Administrative healthcare dataPrediction toolsCancerAdministrative dataPrediction modelsEsophageal cancer |
spellingShingle | Lyndsay Harrison Alyson Mahar Natalie Coburn Randy Boyes Michael Pugliese Carolyn Compton Gail Darling Laura Davis Kathleen Decker Vaibhav Gupta Biniam Kidane Douglas Manuel Jolie Ringash Donna Turner Amy Hsu Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection. International Journal of Population Data Science Administrative healthcare data Prediction tools Cancer Administrative data Prediction models Esophageal cancer |
title | Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection. |
title_full | Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection. |
title_fullStr | Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection. |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection. |
title_short | Development of a Prediction Model for Survival Time in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Resection. |
title_sort | development of a prediction model for survival time in esophageal cancer patients treated with resection |
topic | Administrative healthcare data Prediction tools Cancer Administrative data Prediction models Esophageal cancer |
url | https://ijpds.org/article/view/2097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyndsayharrison developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT alysonmahar developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT nataliecoburn developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT randyboyes developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT michaelpugliese developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT carolyncompton developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT gaildarling developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT lauradavis developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT kathleendecker developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT vaibhavgupta developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT biniamkidane developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT douglasmanuel developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT jolieringash developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT donnaturner developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection AT amyhsu developmentofapredictionmodelforsurvivaltimeinesophagealcancerpatientstreatedwithresection |