Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software
Introduction: Cephalometric analysis have been widely used in orthodontics. The analysis can be conducted in two methods: conventional and digital methods. Practitioners prefer using computerized cephalometric analysis due to its simplicity and less time-consuming compared to manual or conventional...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Padjadjaran
2016-11-01
|
| Series: | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/13671 |
| _version_ | 1819082942872289280 |
|---|---|
| author | Gita Gayatri Andriani Harsanti Yuliawati Zenab Iwa Rahmat Sunaryo |
| author_facet | Gita Gayatri Andriani Harsanti Yuliawati Zenab Iwa Rahmat Sunaryo |
| author_sort | Gita Gayatri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: Cephalometric analysis have been widely used in orthodontics. The analysis can be conducted in two methods: conventional and digital methods. Practitioners prefer using computerized cephalometric analysis due to its simplicity and less time-consuming compared to manual or conventional method. The objective of this study was to identify discrepancies between Conventional Steiner cephalometric analysis and digital cephalometric analysis using CephNinja® Application. This study was an experimental in vivo study with descriptive and comparative approach. Methods: Thirty two negative and digital cephalograms were traced manually using Steiner analysis and digitally using CephNinja® software application. Tracing results of manually analyzed cephalogram and digitally analyzed cephalogram were then compared. Results: There were no distinguished discrepancies between the tracing results of both manually and digitally analyzed cephalogram using Steiner analysis. Conclusion: there was no significant difference of steiner cephalometric analysis conducted using conventional tracing and digital method using CephNinja® application software. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T20:24:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f2aae50284134ce89035a05a1d417244 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1979-0201 2549-6212 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T20:24:42Z |
| publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Padjadjaran |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-f2aae50284134ce89035a05a1d4172442022-12-21T18:51:25ZengUniversitas PadjadjaranPadjadjaran Journal of Dentistry1979-02012549-62122016-11-0128310.24198/pjd.vol28no3.136717603Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application softwareGita Gayatri0Andriani Harsanti1Yuliawati Zenab2Iwa Rahmat Sunaryo3Universitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranUniversitas PadjadjaranIntroduction: Cephalometric analysis have been widely used in orthodontics. The analysis can be conducted in two methods: conventional and digital methods. Practitioners prefer using computerized cephalometric analysis due to its simplicity and less time-consuming compared to manual or conventional method. The objective of this study was to identify discrepancies between Conventional Steiner cephalometric analysis and digital cephalometric analysis using CephNinja® Application. This study was an experimental in vivo study with descriptive and comparative approach. Methods: Thirty two negative and digital cephalograms were traced manually using Steiner analysis and digitally using CephNinja® software application. Tracing results of manually analyzed cephalogram and digitally analyzed cephalogram were then compared. Results: There were no distinguished discrepancies between the tracing results of both manually and digitally analyzed cephalogram using Steiner analysis. Conclusion: there was no significant difference of steiner cephalometric analysis conducted using conventional tracing and digital method using CephNinja® application software.http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/13671analysis, cephninja, steiner cephalometric analysis |
| spellingShingle | Gita Gayatri Andriani Harsanti Yuliawati Zenab Iwa Rahmat Sunaryo Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry analysis, cephninja, steiner cephalometric analysis |
| title | Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software |
| title_full | Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software |
| title_fullStr | Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software |
| title_full_unstemmed | Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software |
| title_short | Steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using Cephninja® application software |
| title_sort | steiner cephalometric analysis discrepancies between conventional and digital methods using cephninja r application software |
| topic | analysis, cephninja, steiner cephalometric analysis |
| url | http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjd/article/view/13671 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gitagayatri steinercephalometricanalysisdiscrepanciesbetweenconventionalanddigitalmethodsusingcephninjaapplicationsoftware AT andrianiharsanti steinercephalometricanalysisdiscrepanciesbetweenconventionalanddigitalmethodsusingcephninjaapplicationsoftware AT yuliawatizenab steinercephalometricanalysisdiscrepanciesbetweenconventionalanddigitalmethodsusingcephninjaapplicationsoftware AT iwarahmatsunaryo steinercephalometricanalysisdiscrepanciesbetweenconventionalanddigitalmethodsusingcephninjaapplicationsoftware |