RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES

Purpose. To update the question of using the biographical method and establishing its interrelation with other scientific methods and methodological principles in historical and anthropological research. Theoretical basis. Consideration of the biographical method in historical and anthropological st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. I. Vlasova, G. G. Krivtchik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan 2018-06-01
Series:Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/132592/130601
_version_ 1818642419580665856
author T. I. Vlasova
G. G. Krivtchik
author_facet T. I. Vlasova
G. G. Krivtchik
author_sort T. I. Vlasova
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To update the question of using the biographical method and establishing its interrelation with other scientific methods and methodological principles in historical and anthropological research. Theoretical basis. Consideration of the biographical method in historical and anthropological studios carried out in the course of the general theoretical "renaissance" of classical humanitarianism, which is largely due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of theoretical discourses and discursive practices of postmodernism, pose to the researcher a number of new tasks. Among them there is "discovery of the implicit" i.e. not just the description of the results of human cultural activity in the immediate given, but the disclosure of sometimes unconscious mechanisms of this activity, of the deep "springs" of culture that ensure its movement. Originality. The authors of this research do not touch on the sociological issues of biographical research, which are widely represented in the writings of contemporary Western researchers. The subject of our message is a biographical method that is genetically derived from Ch. A. Sainte-Beuve, who believed that the main task of the biographer is to carry out an analysis of the personality of a prominent person. The research in the realm of humanities in general and in civil history in particular should take into account not only the changes in the sociocultural aspects of being, but also the corresponding transformation of methodological approaches to the analysis of the epiphenomena of "fluid modernity". This obvious fact led us to an understanding of the need for a historiosophical study of the problem of reception of a biographical method in historical and anthropological works with the subsequent historical, philosophical, cultural representation of the biographical method. Conclusions. The historiosophical transformations of the last decades, with their radical change in concepts, methods and techniques, return the researcher to the improvement of the biographical methodology that today represents anthropocentrism, which fills the science with humanistic content. The use of this methodology requires from a scientist to adhere to the basic methodological principles and mastering other scientific methods, primarily dialectics.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:42:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2b51ecf19464f75aaa61047ad0c73f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:42:46Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan
record_format Article
series Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
spelling doaj.art-f2b51ecf19464f75aaa61047ad0c73f82022-12-21T22:11:34ZengDnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. LazaryanAntropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'2227-72422018-06-0101315616510.15802/ampr.v0i13.132592RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIEST. I. Vlasova0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-5733G. G. Krivtchik1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7504-4575Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan UkraineDnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan UkrainePurpose. To update the question of using the biographical method and establishing its interrelation with other scientific methods and methodological principles in historical and anthropological research. Theoretical basis. Consideration of the biographical method in historical and anthropological studios carried out in the course of the general theoretical "renaissance" of classical humanitarianism, which is largely due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of theoretical discourses and discursive practices of postmodernism, pose to the researcher a number of new tasks. Among them there is "discovery of the implicit" i.e. not just the description of the results of human cultural activity in the immediate given, but the disclosure of sometimes unconscious mechanisms of this activity, of the deep "springs" of culture that ensure its movement. Originality. The authors of this research do not touch on the sociological issues of biographical research, which are widely represented in the writings of contemporary Western researchers. The subject of our message is a biographical method that is genetically derived from Ch. A. Sainte-Beuve, who believed that the main task of the biographer is to carry out an analysis of the personality of a prominent person. The research in the realm of humanities in general and in civil history in particular should take into account not only the changes in the sociocultural aspects of being, but also the corresponding transformation of methodological approaches to the analysis of the epiphenomena of "fluid modernity". This obvious fact led us to an understanding of the need for a historiosophical study of the problem of reception of a biographical method in historical and anthropological works with the subsequent historical, philosophical, cultural representation of the biographical method. Conclusions. The historiosophical transformations of the last decades, with their radical change in concepts, methods and techniques, return the researcher to the improvement of the biographical methodology that today represents anthropocentrism, which fills the science with humanistic content. The use of this methodology requires from a scientist to adhere to the basic methodological principles and mastering other scientific methods, primarily dialectics.http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/132592/130601anthropocentrismpostmodernityhumanismdialecticsprinciplesobjectivitysystematicscomprehensivenesshistorism
spellingShingle T. I. Vlasova
G. G. Krivtchik
RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES
Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
anthropocentrism
postmodernity
humanism
dialectics
principles
objectivity
systematics
comprehensiveness
historism
title RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES
title_full RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES
title_fullStr RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES
title_full_unstemmed RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES
title_short RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES
title_sort reception of the biographical method in historical and anthropogical studies
topic anthropocentrism
postmodernity
humanism
dialectics
principles
objectivity
systematics
comprehensiveness
historism
url http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/132592/130601
work_keys_str_mv AT tivlasova receptionofthebiographicalmethodinhistoricalandanthropogicalstudies
AT ggkrivtchik receptionofthebiographicalmethodinhistoricalandanthropogicalstudies