Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark

Magnetic springs are a fatigue-free alternative to mechanical springs that could enable compliant actuation concepts in highly dynamic industrial applications. The goals of this article are: (1) to develop and validate a methodology for the optimal design of a magnetic spring and (2) to benchmark th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Branimir Mrak, Bert Lenaerts, Walter Driesen, Wim Desmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Actuators
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0825/8/1/18
_version_ 1818209346359656448
author Branimir Mrak
Bert Lenaerts
Walter Driesen
Wim Desmet
author_facet Branimir Mrak
Bert Lenaerts
Walter Driesen
Wim Desmet
author_sort Branimir Mrak
collection DOAJ
description Magnetic springs are a fatigue-free alternative to mechanical springs that could enable compliant actuation concepts in highly dynamic industrial applications. The goals of this article are: (1) to develop and validate a methodology for the optimal design of a magnetic spring and (2) to benchmark the magnetic springs at the component level against conventional solutions, namely, mechanical springs and highly dynamic servo motors. We present an extensive exploration of the magnetic spring design space both with respect to topology and geometry sizing, using a 2D finite element magnetostatics software combined with a multi-objective genetic algorithm, as a part of a MagOpt design environment. The resulting Pareto-optima are used for benchmarking rotational magnetic springs back-to-back with classical industrial solutions. The design methodology has been extensively validated using a combination of one physical prototype and multiple virtual designs. The findings show that magnetic springs possess an energy density 50% higher than that of state-of-the-art reported mechanical springs for the gigacycle regime and accordingly a torque density significantly higher than that of state-of-the-practice permanently magnetic synchronous motors.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:59:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2cc9dcfc83745c8a01c219ccc938a80
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0825
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:59:15Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Actuators
spelling doaj.art-f2cc9dcfc83745c8a01c219ccc938a802022-12-22T00:37:16ZengMDPI AGActuators2076-08252019-02-01811810.3390/act8010018act8010018Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density BenchmarkBranimir Mrak0Bert Lenaerts1Walter Driesen2Wim Desmet3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumMotionS core lab, Flanders Make, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumMotionS core lab, Flanders Make, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, BelgiumMagnetic springs are a fatigue-free alternative to mechanical springs that could enable compliant actuation concepts in highly dynamic industrial applications. The goals of this article are: (1) to develop and validate a methodology for the optimal design of a magnetic spring and (2) to benchmark the magnetic springs at the component level against conventional solutions, namely, mechanical springs and highly dynamic servo motors. We present an extensive exploration of the magnetic spring design space both with respect to topology and geometry sizing, using a 2D finite element magnetostatics software combined with a multi-objective genetic algorithm, as a part of a MagOpt design environment. The resulting Pareto-optima are used for benchmarking rotational magnetic springs back-to-back with classical industrial solutions. The design methodology has been extensively validated using a combination of one physical prototype and multiple virtual designs. The findings show that magnetic springs possess an energy density 50% higher than that of state-of-the-art reported mechanical springs for the gigacycle regime and accordingly a torque density significantly higher than that of state-of-the-practice permanently magnetic synchronous motors.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0825/8/1/18magnetic springoptimal designcomponent benchmarkingcompliant actuationparallel elastic actuators (PEA)series elastic actuators (SEA)
spellingShingle Branimir Mrak
Bert Lenaerts
Walter Driesen
Wim Desmet
Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark
Actuators
magnetic spring
optimal design
component benchmarking
compliant actuation
parallel elastic actuators (PEA)
series elastic actuators (SEA)
title Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark
title_full Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark
title_fullStr Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark
title_short Optimal Magnetic Spring for Compliant Actuation—Validated Torque Density Benchmark
title_sort optimal magnetic spring for compliant actuation validated torque density benchmark
topic magnetic spring
optimal design
component benchmarking
compliant actuation
parallel elastic actuators (PEA)
series elastic actuators (SEA)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0825/8/1/18
work_keys_str_mv AT branimirmrak optimalmagneticspringforcompliantactuationvalidatedtorquedensitybenchmark
AT bertlenaerts optimalmagneticspringforcompliantactuationvalidatedtorquedensitybenchmark
AT walterdriesen optimalmagneticspringforcompliantactuationvalidatedtorquedensitybenchmark
AT wimdesmet optimalmagneticspringforcompliantactuationvalidatedtorquedensitybenchmark