Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research

Background Birth registration is vital to provide legal identity and access to essential services. Worldwide, approximately 166 million children under five years (just under 25%) are unregistered, yet >80% of all births occur in health facilities in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masudah Paleker, Dorothy Boggs, Debra Jackson, Louise-Tina Day, Joy E. Lawn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2286073
_version_ 1827379134100144128
author Masudah Paleker
Dorothy Boggs
Debra Jackson
Louise-Tina Day
Joy E. Lawn
author_facet Masudah Paleker
Dorothy Boggs
Debra Jackson
Louise-Tina Day
Joy E. Lawn
author_sort Masudah Paleker
collection DOAJ
description Background Birth registration is vital to provide legal identity and access to essential services. Worldwide, approximately 166 million children under five years (just under 25%) are unregistered, yet >80% of all births occur in health facilities in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Objectives This study, conducted in association with UNICEF, aims to review facility-based birth registration initiatives, and provide recommendations to close the gap between facility birth and birth registration rates in LMIC. Methods A literature review covering published and grey literature was conducted to identify facility-based initiatives to increase birth registration rates. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted by audio-call with six key global stakeholders to identify additional initiatives, and further insights for barriers and enablers to close the gap. Results Academic databases and grey literature search yielded 21 studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria. Nine barriers preventing birth registration were identified and grouped into three themes: health system, governmental, and societal barriers. Facility-based birth registration initiatives resulted in an increase in birth registration rates. Importantly, health promotion within communities also increased demand for birth registration. In-depth interview respondents provided further detail and supported data found in literature review. Synthesis of the literature and stakeholder interviews noted enablers including inter-sectoral collaboration between health sector and civil registration ministries e.g., placing civil registration offices in health facilities or allowing medical doctors to act as registrars. Conclusion Facility-based birth registration initiatives can increase birth registration rates in LMIC. Initiatives need to address both supply and demand side of birth registration to improve facility-based birth registration rates. A multi-sectoral approach within governments, and alignment with multiple stakeholders is vital.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:07:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2cffbbe4eee43e2b0c238c739274db5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1654-9880
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:07:50Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Global Health Action
spelling doaj.art-f2cffbbe4eee43e2b0c238c739274db52024-01-18T15:58:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802023-12-0116110.1080/16549716.2023.22860732286073Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative researchMasudah Paleker0Dorothy Boggs1Debra Jackson2Louise-Tina DayJoy E. Lawn3London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineBackground Birth registration is vital to provide legal identity and access to essential services. Worldwide, approximately 166 million children under five years (just under 25%) are unregistered, yet >80% of all births occur in health facilities in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Objectives This study, conducted in association with UNICEF, aims to review facility-based birth registration initiatives, and provide recommendations to close the gap between facility birth and birth registration rates in LMIC. Methods A literature review covering published and grey literature was conducted to identify facility-based initiatives to increase birth registration rates. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted by audio-call with six key global stakeholders to identify additional initiatives, and further insights for barriers and enablers to close the gap. Results Academic databases and grey literature search yielded 21 studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria. Nine barriers preventing birth registration were identified and grouped into three themes: health system, governmental, and societal barriers. Facility-based birth registration initiatives resulted in an increase in birth registration rates. Importantly, health promotion within communities also increased demand for birth registration. In-depth interview respondents provided further detail and supported data found in literature review. Synthesis of the literature and stakeholder interviews noted enablers including inter-sectoral collaboration between health sector and civil registration ministries e.g., placing civil registration offices in health facilities or allowing medical doctors to act as registrars. Conclusion Facility-based birth registration initiatives can increase birth registration rates in LMIC. Initiatives need to address both supply and demand side of birth registration to improve facility-based birth registration rates. A multi-sectoral approach within governments, and alignment with multiple stakeholders is vital.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2286073crvsbirth registrationlmicfacility-basednewborn
spellingShingle Masudah Paleker
Dorothy Boggs
Debra Jackson
Louise-Tina Day
Joy E. Lawn
Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research
Global Health Action
crvs
birth registration
lmic
facility-based
newborn
title Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research
title_full Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research
title_fullStr Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research
title_short Closing the birth registration gap for Every newborn facility birth: literature review and qualitative research
title_sort closing the birth registration gap for every newborn facility birth literature review and qualitative research
topic crvs
birth registration
lmic
facility-based
newborn
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2286073
work_keys_str_mv AT masudahpaleker closingthebirthregistrationgapforeverynewbornfacilitybirthliteraturereviewandqualitativeresearch
AT dorothyboggs closingthebirthregistrationgapforeverynewbornfacilitybirthliteraturereviewandqualitativeresearch
AT debrajackson closingthebirthregistrationgapforeverynewbornfacilitybirthliteraturereviewandqualitativeresearch
AT louisetinaday closingthebirthregistrationgapforeverynewbornfacilitybirthliteraturereviewandqualitativeresearch
AT joyelawn closingthebirthregistrationgapforeverynewbornfacilitybirthliteraturereviewandqualitativeresearch