Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content

Geosynthetics have increasingly been used as reinforcement in permanent earth structures, such as road and railway embankments, steep slopes, retaining walls, and bridge abutments. The understanding of soil-geosynthetic interaction is of primary importance for the safe design of geosynthetic-reinfor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda Bessa Ferreira, Castorina Silva Vieira, Maria de Lurdes Lopes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Built Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00012/full
_version_ 1819093241416384512
author Fernanda Bessa Ferreira
Castorina Silva Vieira
Maria de Lurdes Lopes
author_facet Fernanda Bessa Ferreira
Castorina Silva Vieira
Maria de Lurdes Lopes
author_sort Fernanda Bessa Ferreira
collection DOAJ
description Geosynthetics have increasingly been used as reinforcement in permanent earth structures, such as road and railway embankments, steep slopes, retaining walls, and bridge abutments. The understanding of soil-geosynthetic interaction is of primary importance for the safe design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures, such as those included in transportation infrastructure projects. In this study, the pullout behavior of three different geosynthetics (geogrid, geocomposite reinforcement, and geotextile) embedded in a locally available granite residual soil is assessed through a series of large-scale pullout tests involving different soil moisture and density conditions. Test results show that soil density is a key factor affecting the reinforcement pullout resistance and the failure mode at the interface, regardless of geosynthetic type or soil moisture content. The soil moisture condition may considerably influence the pullout response of the geosynthetics, particularly when the soil is in medium dense state. The geogrid exhibited higher peak pullout resistance than the remaining geosynthetics, which is associated with the significant contribution of the passive resistance mobilized against the geogrid transverse members to the overall pullout capacity of the reinforcement.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:08:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2d671d5712b4ad0ad76452b2dd27637
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-3362
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:08:23Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Built Environment
spelling doaj.art-f2d671d5712b4ad0ad76452b2dd276372022-12-21T18:47:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Built Environment2297-33622020-02-01610.3389/fbuil.2020.00012518139Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture ContentFernanda Bessa FerreiraCastorina Silva VieiraMaria de Lurdes LopesGeosynthetics have increasingly been used as reinforcement in permanent earth structures, such as road and railway embankments, steep slopes, retaining walls, and bridge abutments. The understanding of soil-geosynthetic interaction is of primary importance for the safe design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures, such as those included in transportation infrastructure projects. In this study, the pullout behavior of three different geosynthetics (geogrid, geocomposite reinforcement, and geotextile) embedded in a locally available granite residual soil is assessed through a series of large-scale pullout tests involving different soil moisture and density conditions. Test results show that soil density is a key factor affecting the reinforcement pullout resistance and the failure mode at the interface, regardless of geosynthetic type or soil moisture content. The soil moisture condition may considerably influence the pullout response of the geosynthetics, particularly when the soil is in medium dense state. The geogrid exhibited higher peak pullout resistance than the remaining geosynthetics, which is associated with the significant contribution of the passive resistance mobilized against the geogrid transverse members to the overall pullout capacity of the reinforcement.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00012/fullgeosyntheticsgeosynthetic-reinforced soil structurespullout behaviorsoil moisture contentsoil density
spellingShingle Fernanda Bessa Ferreira
Castorina Silva Vieira
Maria de Lurdes Lopes
Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content
Frontiers in Built Environment
geosynthetics
geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures
pullout behavior
soil moisture content
soil density
title Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content
title_full Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content
title_fullStr Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content
title_full_unstemmed Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content
title_short Pullout Behavior of Different Geosynthetics—Influence of Soil Density and Moisture Content
title_sort pullout behavior of different geosynthetics influence of soil density and moisture content
topic geosynthetics
geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures
pullout behavior
soil moisture content
soil density
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00012/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandabessaferreira pulloutbehaviorofdifferentgeosyntheticsinfluenceofsoildensityandmoisturecontent
AT castorinasilvavieira pulloutbehaviorofdifferentgeosyntheticsinfluenceofsoildensityandmoisturecontent
AT mariadelurdeslopes pulloutbehaviorofdifferentgeosyntheticsinfluenceofsoildensityandmoisturecontent