Museology and heritage: agreements and disagreements

By directing our gaze to the 20s and 30s of last century, we can verify the different projects presented by Brazilian intellectuals to the areas of heritage and museums. This assertion can be confirmed through analysis of various projects and draft bills that sought to regulate both. During this per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcio Ferreira Rangel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 2012-04-01
Series:Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-81222012000100008&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
Description
Summary:By directing our gaze to the 20s and 30s of last century, we can verify the different projects presented by Brazilian intellectuals to the areas of heritage and museums. This assertion can be confirmed through analysis of various projects and draft bills that sought to regulate both. During this period puts into practice the idea of ​​building a state where the elites have a prominent role in the delivery of cultural and political issue. In this context the following institutions are created: the National History Museum (1922), Course of Museums (1932) and National Monuments Inspectorate (1934). Both the course of Museums such as the National Monuments Inspectorate, are considered landmarks. The first in the institutionalization of museology and museum studies in Brazil. The second was a main background of the Department of Historical and Artistic Heritage (SPHAN) Current IPHAN, created in 1937. This article aims to examine and discuss the role played by different actors in the process of formation and configuration of these two areas, museums and heritage, emphasizing aspects of convergence and divergence in their paths.
ISSN:1981-8122