Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series

Aims: We assessed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who have undergone a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and sought to validate a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in a PAO cohort. Methods: All patients who had undergone a PAO from July 1998 to February 2013 were surveyed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James T. Berwin, Sean D. X. Duffy, Martin F. Gargan, James R. Barnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-12-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0081.R1
_version_ 1797383295503171584
author James T. Berwin
Sean D. X. Duffy
Martin F. Gargan
James R. Barnes
author_facet James T. Berwin
Sean D. X. Duffy
Martin F. Gargan
James R. Barnes
author_sort James T. Berwin
collection DOAJ
description Aims: We assessed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who have undergone a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and sought to validate a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in a PAO cohort. Methods: All patients who had undergone a PAO from July 1998 to February 2013 were surveyed, with several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiological measurements of preoperative acetabular dysplasia and postoperative correction also recorded. Patients were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with their operation in achieving pain relief, restoration of activities of daily living, ability to perform recreational activity, and their overall level of satisfaction with the procedure. Results: A total of 143 PAOs were performed between 1998 and 2013. Of those, 90 postoperative surveys were returned. Only 65 patients (73 hips) had both pre- and postoperative radiographs available for measurement. The mean time to follow-up was 15 years (6.5 to 20). Most patients were female (91%), with a mean age of 26.4 years (14.9 to 48.3) at the time of their surgery. A statistically significant improvement in radiological correction was detected in all hips (p < 0.001). A total of 67 patients (92.3%) remained either very satisfied or satisfied with their PAO. The internal consistency of the patient satisfaction questionnaire, measured using Cronbach’s α, ranged from 0.89 to 0.94 indicating ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ reliability. Conclusion: Outcomes of importance to patients undergoing a PAO include several key domains: pain relief, improve activities of daily living, and improve recreational ability. Our study demonstrates high rates of long-term patient satisfaction in all domains, and found the patient satisfaction questionnaire to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in this cohort. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):964–969.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:18:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2e3ced8d5e041bb88b06fdfed730ef7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2633-1462
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:18:54Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj.art-f2e3ced8d5e041bb88b06fdfed730ef72023-12-21T12:27:35ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622023-12-0141296496910.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0081.R1Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive seriesJames T. Berwin0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-5434Sean D. X. Duffy1Martin F. Gargan2James R. Barnes3The Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bristol Royal Children’s Hospital, Bristol, UKThe Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bristol Royal Children’s Hospital, Bristol, UKThe Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bristol Royal Children’s Hospital, Bristol, UKThe Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bristol Royal Children’s Hospital, Bristol, UKAims: We assessed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who have undergone a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and sought to validate a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in a PAO cohort. Methods: All patients who had undergone a PAO from July 1998 to February 2013 were surveyed, with several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiological measurements of preoperative acetabular dysplasia and postoperative correction also recorded. Patients were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with their operation in achieving pain relief, restoration of activities of daily living, ability to perform recreational activity, and their overall level of satisfaction with the procedure. Results: A total of 143 PAOs were performed between 1998 and 2013. Of those, 90 postoperative surveys were returned. Only 65 patients (73 hips) had both pre- and postoperative radiographs available for measurement. The mean time to follow-up was 15 years (6.5 to 20). Most patients were female (91%), with a mean age of 26.4 years (14.9 to 48.3) at the time of their surgery. A statistically significant improvement in radiological correction was detected in all hips (p < 0.001). A total of 67 patients (92.3%) remained either very satisfied or satisfied with their PAO. The internal consistency of the patient satisfaction questionnaire, measured using Cronbach’s α, ranged from 0.89 to 0.94 indicating ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ reliability. Conclusion: Outcomes of importance to patients undergoing a PAO include several key domains: pain relief, improve activities of daily living, and improve recreational ability. Our study demonstrates high rates of long-term patient satisfaction in all domains, and found the patient satisfaction questionnaire to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in this cohort. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):964–969.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0081.R1acetabulumosteotomyoutcomesperiacetabular osteotomieshipspatient-reported outcome measures (proms)postoperative radiographsacetabular dysplasiaeq-5d scoresosteoarthritiswomac scoresanterior centre edge anglehip and knee arthroplasty
spellingShingle James T. Berwin
Sean D. X. Duffy
Martin F. Gargan
James R. Barnes
Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
Bone & Joint Open
acetabulum
osteotomy
outcomes
periacetabular osteotomies
hips
patient-reported outcome measures (proms)
postoperative radiographs
acetabular dysplasia
eq-5d scores
osteoarthritis
womac scores
anterior centre edge angle
hip and knee arthroplasty
title Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
title_full Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
title_fullStr Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
title_full_unstemmed Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
title_short Long-term patient-centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
title_sort long term patient centred outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy in a large consecutive series
topic acetabulum
osteotomy
outcomes
periacetabular osteotomies
hips
patient-reported outcome measures (proms)
postoperative radiographs
acetabular dysplasia
eq-5d scores
osteoarthritis
womac scores
anterior centre edge angle
hip and knee arthroplasty
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0081.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT jamestberwin longtermpatientcentredoutcomesofperiacetabularosteotomyinalargeconsecutiveseries
AT seandxduffy longtermpatientcentredoutcomesofperiacetabularosteotomyinalargeconsecutiveseries
AT martinfgargan longtermpatientcentredoutcomesofperiacetabularosteotomyinalargeconsecutiveseries
AT jamesrbarnes longtermpatientcentredoutcomesofperiacetabularosteotomyinalargeconsecutiveseries