Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes

Various pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgia Antonopoulou, Dimitrios Vayenas, Gerasimos Lyberatos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/2/296
_version_ 1818152120227987456
author Georgia Antonopoulou
Dimitrios Vayenas
Gerasimos Lyberatos
author_facet Georgia Antonopoulou
Dimitrios Vayenas
Gerasimos Lyberatos
author_sort Georgia Antonopoulou
collection DOAJ
description Various pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and liquid fractions obtained. In addition, the effect of each pretreatment on carbohydrate solubilization and lignocellulossic content fractionation (to cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin) was also evaluated. The experimental results showed that the methane yield was enhanced with alkaline pretreatment and, the higher the NaOH concentration (20 g/100 gTotal Solids (TS)), the higher was the methane yield observed (427.07 L CH<sub>4</sub>/kg Volatile Solids (VS), which was almost 25.7% higher than the BMP of the untreated GL). Comparing the BMP obtained under the two options, i.e., that of the whole pretreatment slurry with the sum of the BMPs of both fractions, it was found that direct anaerobic digestion without separation of the pretreated biomass was favored, in almost all cases. A preliminary energy balance and economic assessment indicated that the process could be sustainable, leading to a positive net heat energy only when using a more concentrated pretreated slurry (i.e., 20% organic loading), or when applying NaOH pretreatment at a lower chemical loading.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:49:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f2f6607a2b934afbb7b697960d0b5647
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:49:40Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-f2f6607a2b934afbb7b697960d0b56472022-12-22T01:04:20ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492020-01-0125229610.3390/molecules25020296molecules25020296Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process SchemesGeorgia Antonopoulou0Dimitrios Vayenas1Gerasimos Lyberatos2Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Stadiou, Platani, GR 26504 Patras, GreeceInstitute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Stadiou, Platani, GR 26504 Patras, GreeceInstitute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Stadiou, Platani, GR 26504 Patras, GreeceVarious pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and liquid fractions obtained. In addition, the effect of each pretreatment on carbohydrate solubilization and lignocellulossic content fractionation (to cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin) was also evaluated. The experimental results showed that the methane yield was enhanced with alkaline pretreatment and, the higher the NaOH concentration (20 g/100 gTotal Solids (TS)), the higher was the methane yield observed (427.07 L CH<sub>4</sub>/kg Volatile Solids (VS), which was almost 25.7% higher than the BMP of the untreated GL). Comparing the BMP obtained under the two options, i.e., that of the whole pretreatment slurry with the sum of the BMPs of both fractions, it was found that direct anaerobic digestion without separation of the pretreated biomass was favored, in almost all cases. A preliminary energy balance and economic assessment indicated that the process could be sustainable, leading to a positive net heat energy only when using a more concentrated pretreated slurry (i.e., 20% organic loading), or when applying NaOH pretreatment at a lower chemical loading.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/2/296grass lawn wasteanaerobic digestionbiochemical methane potentialpretreatmentwhole slurryseparated fractionsalkaliacidenergy balanceeconomical assessment
spellingShingle Georgia Antonopoulou
Dimitrios Vayenas
Gerasimos Lyberatos
Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
Molecules
grass lawn waste
anaerobic digestion
biochemical methane potential
pretreatment
whole slurry
separated fractions
alkali
acid
energy balance
economical assessment
title Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_full Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_fullStr Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_full_unstemmed Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_short Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_sort biogas production from physicochemically pretreated grass lawn waste comparison of different process schemes
topic grass lawn waste
anaerobic digestion
biochemical methane potential
pretreatment
whole slurry
separated fractions
alkali
acid
energy balance
economical assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/2/296
work_keys_str_mv AT georgiaantonopoulou biogasproductionfromphysicochemicallypretreatedgrasslawnwastecomparisonofdifferentprocessschemes
AT dimitriosvayenas biogasproductionfromphysicochemicallypretreatedgrasslawnwastecomparisonofdifferentprocessschemes
AT gerasimoslyberatos biogasproductionfromphysicochemicallypretreatedgrasslawnwastecomparisonofdifferentprocessschemes