Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections
This work intends to define the resolution requirements for near-field projections in a psycho-physical study design to evaluate the participants’ perception under the influence of different ambient lighting levels and various viewing distances. The variation in ambient lighting and viewing distance...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/2/1039 |
_version_ | 1797446529557987328 |
---|---|
author | Alexander Stuckert Tran Quoc Khanh |
author_facet | Alexander Stuckert Tran Quoc Khanh |
author_sort | Alexander Stuckert |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This work intends to define the resolution requirements for near-field projections in a psycho-physical study design to evaluate the participants’ perception under the influence of different ambient lighting levels and various viewing distances. The variation in ambient lighting and viewing distances relates to various daytime and critical distances in urban environments. The application of near-field projections increases the popularity of communication- or safety-relevant projections, such as for automated vehicles. However, previous studies in the filming industry have shown that the resolution requirements differ depending on the application. In this work, a field study design presents an experimental approach to define a perceived resolution on the street surface in the near field around the vehicle. Furthermore, the study evaluates the influence of viewing distance, ambient lighting and projection content on the perceived resolution in detail. The results reveal a significant dependency on ambient lighting (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, this work states that the symbol-based projection has lower resolution requirements, e.g., a viewing distance of 1 m and 3 m results in a 2 pixels per degree resolution compared to the text-based projection in the parking garage scenario. Nevertheless, in the dusk/dawn scenario, the perceived resolution can be grouped for viewing distances above 1 m for content-independent projections. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T13:42:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f2f7632167ee42b4bf63ebfa02b46edd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3417 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T13:42:50Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Applied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-f2f7632167ee42b4bf63ebfa02b46edd2023-11-30T21:05:19ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-01-01132103910.3390/app13021039Resolution Aspects for Near-Field ProjectionsAlexander Stuckert0Tran Quoc Khanh1Laboratory of Adaptive Lighting Systems and Visual Processing, Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 4a, 64289 Darmstadt, GermanyLaboratory of Adaptive Lighting Systems and Visual Processing, Technical University of Darmstadt, Hochschulstr. 4a, 64289 Darmstadt, GermanyThis work intends to define the resolution requirements for near-field projections in a psycho-physical study design to evaluate the participants’ perception under the influence of different ambient lighting levels and various viewing distances. The variation in ambient lighting and viewing distances relates to various daytime and critical distances in urban environments. The application of near-field projections increases the popularity of communication- or safety-relevant projections, such as for automated vehicles. However, previous studies in the filming industry have shown that the resolution requirements differ depending on the application. In this work, a field study design presents an experimental approach to define a perceived resolution on the street surface in the near field around the vehicle. Furthermore, the study evaluates the influence of viewing distance, ambient lighting and projection content on the perceived resolution in detail. The results reveal a significant dependency on ambient lighting (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, this work states that the symbol-based projection has lower resolution requirements, e.g., a viewing distance of 1 m and 3 m results in a 2 pixels per degree resolution compared to the text-based projection in the parking garage scenario. Nevertheless, in the dusk/dawn scenario, the perceived resolution can be grouped for viewing distances above 1 m for content-independent projections.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/2/1039near-field projectionsresolutionambient luminanceprojection contentlogistic regressionhuman-centric lighting |
spellingShingle | Alexander Stuckert Tran Quoc Khanh Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections Applied Sciences near-field projections resolution ambient luminance projection content logistic regression human-centric lighting |
title | Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections |
title_full | Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections |
title_fullStr | Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections |
title_full_unstemmed | Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections |
title_short | Resolution Aspects for Near-Field Projections |
title_sort | resolution aspects for near field projections |
topic | near-field projections resolution ambient luminance projection content logistic regression human-centric lighting |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/2/1039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderstuckert resolutionaspectsfornearfieldprojections AT tranquockhanh resolutionaspectsfornearfieldprojections |