Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals

Background: The aging of the US population has been associated with an increase in intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and correspondingly, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among the oldest-old (age ≥80 years). While previous studies have examined ICU and IMV outcomes in the elderly, very few...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Puthiery Va, Parth Rali, Harshitha Kota, Vivian Keenan, Sobia Mujtaba, Win Naing, Reka Salgunan, Irene Galperin, Oleg Epelbaum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Lung India
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.lungindia.com/article.asp?issn=0970-2113;year=2018;volume=35;issue=6;spage=461;epage=466;aulast=Va
_version_ 1818285404496855040
author Puthiery Va
Parth Rali
Harshitha Kota
Vivian Keenan
Sobia Mujtaba
Win Naing
Reka Salgunan
Irene Galperin
Oleg Epelbaum
author_facet Puthiery Va
Parth Rali
Harshitha Kota
Vivian Keenan
Sobia Mujtaba
Win Naing
Reka Salgunan
Irene Galperin
Oleg Epelbaum
author_sort Puthiery Va
collection DOAJ
description Background: The aging of the US population has been associated with an increase in intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and correspondingly, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among the oldest-old (age ≥80 years). While previous studies have examined ICU and IMV outcomes in the elderly, very few have focused on patient-centered outcomes, specifically home return, in the oldest-old. We investigated the rate of immediate home return following IMV in the medical ICU in previously home-dwelling oldest-old patients relative to that of a comparison group of 50–70-year olds. Methods: Data were extracted retrospectively from patient records at Elmhurst Hospital Center in Elmhurst, NY, USA, encompassing the period from January 2009 to May 2014 and Jacobi Medical Center in the Bronx, NY, USA, from January 2010 to March 2014. Medical ICU admissions within those date ranges were screened for possible inclusion into one of two study groups based on age: ≥80 years old and 50–70 years old. The primary end point was hospital discharge: home return versus no home return (death or nonhome discharge). Cox proportional hazards' regression models were used to estimate crude and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for failure to return home. Results: A total of 375 patients were included in the analysis: 279 (74%) patients aged 50–70 years and 96 (26%) patients aged ≥80 years. Compared to 50–70-year olds, being ≥80 years old was associated with a nearly two-fold greater risk of no home return: adjusted HR: 1.96; 95% CI 1.43–2.67. The oldest-old was at significantly increased risk of both being discharged to a skilled nursing facility or subacute rehabilitation (adjusted HR: 2.19; 95% CI 1.33–3.59) as well as of dying in the hospital (adjusted HR: 1.81; 95% CI 1.21–2.71). Conclusion: Previously home-dwelling oldest-old are at significantly increased risk of failing to return home immediately following medical ICU admission with IMV as compared to patients aged 50–70 years. These results can help medical ICU staff establish appropriate expectations when addressing the families of their oldest patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential for delayed home return among the oldest old and to assess the ability of frailty indices to predict home return within this ICU population.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:08:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f31167c4861642e9b08dc232210e08f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-2113
0974-598X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:08:10Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Lung India
spelling doaj.art-f31167c4861642e9b08dc232210e08f22022-12-22T00:04:32ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsLung India0970-21130974-598X2018-01-0135646146610.4103/lungindia.lungindia_76_18Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitalsPuthiery VaParth RaliHarshitha KotaVivian KeenanSobia MujtabaWin NaingReka SalgunanIrene GalperinOleg EpelbaumBackground: The aging of the US population has been associated with an increase in intensive care unit (ICU) utilization and correspondingly, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among the oldest-old (age ≥80 years). While previous studies have examined ICU and IMV outcomes in the elderly, very few have focused on patient-centered outcomes, specifically home return, in the oldest-old. We investigated the rate of immediate home return following IMV in the medical ICU in previously home-dwelling oldest-old patients relative to that of a comparison group of 50–70-year olds. Methods: Data were extracted retrospectively from patient records at Elmhurst Hospital Center in Elmhurst, NY, USA, encompassing the period from January 2009 to May 2014 and Jacobi Medical Center in the Bronx, NY, USA, from January 2010 to March 2014. Medical ICU admissions within those date ranges were screened for possible inclusion into one of two study groups based on age: ≥80 years old and 50–70 years old. The primary end point was hospital discharge: home return versus no home return (death or nonhome discharge). Cox proportional hazards' regression models were used to estimate crude and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for failure to return home. Results: A total of 375 patients were included in the analysis: 279 (74%) patients aged 50–70 years and 96 (26%) patients aged ≥80 years. Compared to 50–70-year olds, being ≥80 years old was associated with a nearly two-fold greater risk of no home return: adjusted HR: 1.96; 95% CI 1.43–2.67. The oldest-old was at significantly increased risk of both being discharged to a skilled nursing facility or subacute rehabilitation (adjusted HR: 2.19; 95% CI 1.33–3.59) as well as of dying in the hospital (adjusted HR: 1.81; 95% CI 1.21–2.71). Conclusion: Previously home-dwelling oldest-old are at significantly increased risk of failing to return home immediately following medical ICU admission with IMV as compared to patients aged 50–70 years. These results can help medical ICU staff establish appropriate expectations when addressing the families of their oldest patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential for delayed home return among the oldest old and to assess the ability of frailty indices to predict home return within this ICU population.http://www.lungindia.com/article.asp?issn=0970-2113;year=2018;volume=35;issue=6;spage=461;epage=466;aulast=VaHome returnmechanical ventilation in oldoctogenariansoutcome
spellingShingle Puthiery Va
Parth Rali
Harshitha Kota
Vivian Keenan
Sobia Mujtaba
Win Naing
Reka Salgunan
Irene Galperin
Oleg Epelbaum
Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals
Lung India
Home return
mechanical ventilation in old
octogenarians
outcome
title Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals
title_full Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals
title_fullStr Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals
title_short Home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest-old patients in medical intensive care units from two US hospitals
title_sort home return following invasive mechanical ventilation for the oldest old patients in medical intensive care units from two us hospitals
topic Home return
mechanical ventilation in old
octogenarians
outcome
url http://www.lungindia.com/article.asp?issn=0970-2113;year=2018;volume=35;issue=6;spage=461;epage=466;aulast=Va
work_keys_str_mv AT puthieryva homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT parthrali homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT harshithakota homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT viviankeenan homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT sobiamujtaba homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT winnaing homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT rekasalgunan homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT irenegalperin homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals
AT olegepelbaum homereturnfollowinginvasivemechanicalventilationfortheoldestoldpatientsinmedicalintensivecareunitsfromtwoushospitals