Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Radical Pair model proposes that magnetoreception is a light-dependent process. Under low monochromatic light from the short-wavelength part of the visual spectrum, migratory birds show orientation in their migratory direction. U...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bischof Hans-Joachim, Stapput Katrin, Wiltschko Roswitha, Wiltschko Wolfgang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Zoology
Online Access:http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/5
_version_ 1818915939348905984
author Bischof Hans-Joachim
Stapput Katrin
Wiltschko Roswitha
Wiltschko Wolfgang
author_facet Bischof Hans-Joachim
Stapput Katrin
Wiltschko Roswitha
Wiltschko Wolfgang
author_sort Bischof Hans-Joachim
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Radical Pair model proposes that magnetoreception is a light-dependent process. Under low monochromatic light from the short-wavelength part of the visual spectrum, migratory birds show orientation in their migratory direction. Under monochromatic light of higher intensity, however, they showed unusual preferences for other directions or axial preferences. To determine whether or not these responses are still controlled by the respective light regimes, European robins, <it>Erithacus rubecula</it>, were tested under UV, Blue, Turquoise and Green light at increasing intensities, with orientation in migratory direction serving as a criterion whether or not magnetoreception works in the normal way.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The birds were well oriented in their seasonally appropriate migratory direction under 424 nm Blue, 502 nm Turquoise and 565 nm Green light of low intensity with a quantal flux of 8·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2</sup>, indicating unimpaired magnetoreception. Under 373 nm UV of the same quantal flux, they were not oriented in migratory direction, showing a preference for the east-west axis instead, but they were well oriented in migratory direction under UV of lower intensity. Intensities of above 36·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2 </sup>of Blue, Turquoise and Green light elicited a variety of responses: disorientation, headings along the east-west axis, headings along the north-south axis or 'fixed' direction tendencies. These responses changed as the intensity was increased from 36·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2 </sup>to 54 and 72·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2</sup>.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The specific manifestation of responses in directions other than the migratory direction clearly depends on the ambient light regime. This implies that even when the mechanisms normally providing magnetic compass information seem disrupted, processes that are activated by light still control the behavior. It suggests complex interactions between different types of receptors, magnetic and visual. The nature of the receptors involved and details of their connections are not yet known; however, a role of the color cones in the processes mediating magnetic input is suggested.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:10:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f338b11767424d1687c65a15dc05f760
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1742-9994
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:10:15Z
publishDate 2007-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Zoology
spelling doaj.art-f338b11767424d1687c65a15dc05f7602022-12-21T20:00:31ZengBMCFrontiers in Zoology1742-99942007-02-0141510.1186/1742-9994-4-5Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the responseBischof Hans-JoachimStapput KatrinWiltschko RoswithaWiltschko Wolfgang<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Radical Pair model proposes that magnetoreception is a light-dependent process. Under low monochromatic light from the short-wavelength part of the visual spectrum, migratory birds show orientation in their migratory direction. Under monochromatic light of higher intensity, however, they showed unusual preferences for other directions or axial preferences. To determine whether or not these responses are still controlled by the respective light regimes, European robins, <it>Erithacus rubecula</it>, were tested under UV, Blue, Turquoise and Green light at increasing intensities, with orientation in migratory direction serving as a criterion whether or not magnetoreception works in the normal way.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The birds were well oriented in their seasonally appropriate migratory direction under 424 nm Blue, 502 nm Turquoise and 565 nm Green light of low intensity with a quantal flux of 8·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2</sup>, indicating unimpaired magnetoreception. Under 373 nm UV of the same quantal flux, they were not oriented in migratory direction, showing a preference for the east-west axis instead, but they were well oriented in migratory direction under UV of lower intensity. Intensities of above 36·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2 </sup>of Blue, Turquoise and Green light elicited a variety of responses: disorientation, headings along the east-west axis, headings along the north-south axis or 'fixed' direction tendencies. These responses changed as the intensity was increased from 36·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2 </sup>to 54 and 72·10<sup>15 </sup>quanta s<sup>-1 </sup>m<sup>-2</sup>.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The specific manifestation of responses in directions other than the migratory direction clearly depends on the ambient light regime. This implies that even when the mechanisms normally providing magnetic compass information seem disrupted, processes that are activated by light still control the behavior. It suggests complex interactions between different types of receptors, magnetic and visual. The nature of the receptors involved and details of their connections are not yet known; however, a role of the color cones in the processes mediating magnetic input is suggested.</p>http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/5
spellingShingle Bischof Hans-Joachim
Stapput Katrin
Wiltschko Roswitha
Wiltschko Wolfgang
Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
Frontiers in Zoology
title Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
title_full Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
title_fullStr Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
title_full_unstemmed Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
title_short Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
title_sort light dependent magnetoreception in birds increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response
url http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/4/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT bischofhansjoachim lightdependentmagnetoreceptioninbirdsincreasingintensityofmonochromaticlightchangesthenatureoftheresponse
AT stapputkatrin lightdependentmagnetoreceptioninbirdsincreasingintensityofmonochromaticlightchangesthenatureoftheresponse
AT wiltschkoroswitha lightdependentmagnetoreceptioninbirdsincreasingintensityofmonochromaticlightchangesthenatureoftheresponse
AT wiltschkowolfgang lightdependentmagnetoreceptioninbirdsincreasingintensityofmonochromaticlightchangesthenatureoftheresponse