What the eyes can’t see

Over the last years, Monteiro Lobato has been rightfully accused by Brazilian and Latin American scholars of expressing racist and eugenic ideas in his body of work. In this article, we take a step further and add to this traditional portrait of his literary production an analysis of the impact of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruno Franco Medeiros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) 2021-04-01
Series:História da Historiografia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1744
_version_ 1818902296385290240
author Bruno Franco Medeiros
author_facet Bruno Franco Medeiros
author_sort Bruno Franco Medeiros
collection DOAJ
description Over the last years, Monteiro Lobato has been rightfully accused by Brazilian and Latin American scholars of expressing racist and eugenic ideas in his body of work. In this article, we take a step further and add to this traditional portrait of his literary production an analysis of the impact of a new set of technological media during the first decades of the twentieth century on his writings. We discuss how these two main issues – i.e., technology and race – played out in Lobato’s historical representation of Brazil’s past and future and the influence that the United States could play in it. We show how a revisionary and racist version of the United States’ history and the ideal of an American technological prosperity in the 1920s inspired one of Lobato’s most contentious novels, the technological dystopia O Presidente Negro, ou O Choque das Raças, published in 1926.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:33:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f34710d93b304edb85fae926e9b2e332
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1983-9928
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:33:24Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
record_format Article
series História da Historiografia
spelling doaj.art-f34710d93b304edb85fae926e9b2e3322022-12-21T20:06:37ZengUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)História da Historiografia1983-99282021-04-01143510.15848/hh.v14i35.1744What the eyes can’t seeBruno Franco Medeiros0Independent ResearcherOver the last years, Monteiro Lobato has been rightfully accused by Brazilian and Latin American scholars of expressing racist and eugenic ideas in his body of work. In this article, we take a step further and add to this traditional portrait of his literary production an analysis of the impact of a new set of technological media during the first decades of the twentieth century on his writings. We discuss how these two main issues – i.e., technology and race – played out in Lobato’s historical representation of Brazil’s past and future and the influence that the United States could play in it. We show how a revisionary and racist version of the United States’ history and the ideal of an American technological prosperity in the 1920s inspired one of Lobato’s most contentious novels, the technological dystopia O Presidente Negro, ou O Choque das Raças, published in 1926.https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1744Monteiro LobatoNationalismUnited States of America
spellingShingle Bruno Franco Medeiros
What the eyes can’t see
História da Historiografia
Monteiro Lobato
Nationalism
United States of America
title What the eyes can’t see
title_full What the eyes can’t see
title_fullStr What the eyes can’t see
title_full_unstemmed What the eyes can’t see
title_short What the eyes can’t see
title_sort what the eyes can t see
topic Monteiro Lobato
Nationalism
United States of America
url https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1744
work_keys_str_mv AT brunofrancomedeiros whattheeyescantsee