What the eyes can’t see
Over the last years, Monteiro Lobato has been rightfully accused by Brazilian and Latin American scholars of expressing racist and eugenic ideas in his body of work. In this article, we take a step further and add to this traditional portrait of his literary production an analysis of the impact of a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
2021-04-01
|
Series: | História da Historiografia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1744 |
_version_ | 1818902296385290240 |
---|---|
author | Bruno Franco Medeiros |
author_facet | Bruno Franco Medeiros |
author_sort | Bruno Franco Medeiros |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Over the last years, Monteiro Lobato has been rightfully accused by Brazilian and Latin American scholars of expressing racist and eugenic ideas in his body of work. In this article, we take a step further and add to this traditional portrait of his literary production an analysis of the impact of a new set of technological media during the first decades of the twentieth century on his writings. We discuss how these two main issues – i.e., technology and race – played out in Lobato’s historical representation of Brazil’s past and future and the influence that the United States could play in it. We show how a revisionary and racist version of the United States’ history and the ideal of an American technological prosperity in the 1920s inspired one of Lobato’s most contentious novels, the technological dystopia O Presidente Negro, ou O Choque das Raças, published in 1926. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T20:33:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f34710d93b304edb85fae926e9b2e332 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1983-9928 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T20:33:24Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) |
record_format | Article |
series | História da Historiografia |
spelling | doaj.art-f34710d93b304edb85fae926e9b2e3322022-12-21T20:06:37ZengUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)História da Historiografia1983-99282021-04-01143510.15848/hh.v14i35.1744What the eyes can’t seeBruno Franco Medeiros0Independent ResearcherOver the last years, Monteiro Lobato has been rightfully accused by Brazilian and Latin American scholars of expressing racist and eugenic ideas in his body of work. In this article, we take a step further and add to this traditional portrait of his literary production an analysis of the impact of a new set of technological media during the first decades of the twentieth century on his writings. We discuss how these two main issues – i.e., technology and race – played out in Lobato’s historical representation of Brazil’s past and future and the influence that the United States could play in it. We show how a revisionary and racist version of the United States’ history and the ideal of an American technological prosperity in the 1920s inspired one of Lobato’s most contentious novels, the technological dystopia O Presidente Negro, ou O Choque das Raças, published in 1926.https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1744Monteiro LobatoNationalismUnited States of America |
spellingShingle | Bruno Franco Medeiros What the eyes can’t see História da Historiografia Monteiro Lobato Nationalism United States of America |
title | What the eyes can’t see |
title_full | What the eyes can’t see |
title_fullStr | What the eyes can’t see |
title_full_unstemmed | What the eyes can’t see |
title_short | What the eyes can’t see |
title_sort | what the eyes can t see |
topic | Monteiro Lobato Nationalism United States of America |
url | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunofrancomedeiros whattheeyescantsee |