Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders

Abstract Background Attentional biases are a relatively robust phenomenon among clinical populations but less pronounced in healthy participants. However, regarding the components of attentional biases and the directions of attention allocation, there are several inconsistencies in the literature. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Iffland, Angelina Weitkämper, Nicolai J. Weitkämper, Frank Neuner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-019-0284-1
_version_ 1818436243621412864
author Benjamin Iffland
Angelina Weitkämper
Nicolai J. Weitkämper
Frank Neuner
author_facet Benjamin Iffland
Angelina Weitkämper
Nicolai J. Weitkämper
Frank Neuner
author_sort Benjamin Iffland
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Attentional biases are a relatively robust phenomenon among clinical populations but less pronounced in healthy participants. However, regarding the components of attentional biases and the directions of attention allocation, there are several inconsistencies in the literature. The present study examined whether these inconsistencies can be traced back to previous experiences of relational peer victimization in clinical populations. Methods Participants were subjects with a diagnosed psychiatric disorder (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 31). Additionally, the sample was divided into two subgroups according to the participants’ reports of previous relational peer victimization (high peer victimization: n = 28; low peer victimization: n = 33). Attentional biases were measured by the Emotional Stroop task and a dot-probe task. Results In both samples, peer victimized participants showed delayed response times when color-naming negative and positive compared to neutral adjectives in the Emotional Stroop task. Likewise, the dot-probe task indicated attentional avoidance of both negative and positive words in peer victimized participants with and without a psychiatric disorder. Interestingly, presence of a psychiatric disorder did not have a significant effect on attentional biases. Conclusion Both tasks could detect that attentional processes were linked to the experience of peer victimization rather than to the current diagnostic status of the participants. Attentional avoidance of emotional stimuli may prevent victimized individuals from responding adequately to environmental stimuli, which may increase the risk for the development of psychopathology.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T17:05:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f355b076c3ae4996a6eec08ae2ff8851
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-7283
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T17:05:41Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj.art-f355b076c3ae4996a6eec08ae2ff88512022-12-21T22:53:44ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832019-02-017111710.1186/s40359-019-0284-1Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disordersBenjamin Iffland0Angelina Weitkämper1Nicolai J. Weitkämper2Frank Neuner3Department of Psychology, Bielefeld UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld UniversityAbstract Background Attentional biases are a relatively robust phenomenon among clinical populations but less pronounced in healthy participants. However, regarding the components of attentional biases and the directions of attention allocation, there are several inconsistencies in the literature. The present study examined whether these inconsistencies can be traced back to previous experiences of relational peer victimization in clinical populations. Methods Participants were subjects with a diagnosed psychiatric disorder (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 31). Additionally, the sample was divided into two subgroups according to the participants’ reports of previous relational peer victimization (high peer victimization: n = 28; low peer victimization: n = 33). Attentional biases were measured by the Emotional Stroop task and a dot-probe task. Results In both samples, peer victimized participants showed delayed response times when color-naming negative and positive compared to neutral adjectives in the Emotional Stroop task. Likewise, the dot-probe task indicated attentional avoidance of both negative and positive words in peer victimized participants with and without a psychiatric disorder. Interestingly, presence of a psychiatric disorder did not have a significant effect on attentional biases. Conclusion Both tasks could detect that attentional processes were linked to the experience of peer victimization rather than to the current diagnostic status of the participants. Attentional avoidance of emotional stimuli may prevent victimized individuals from responding adequately to environmental stimuli, which may increase the risk for the development of psychopathology.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-019-0284-1Child maltreatmentPeer victimizationAttentionAttentional biasAttentional avoidance
spellingShingle Benjamin Iffland
Angelina Weitkämper
Nicolai J. Weitkämper
Frank Neuner
Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
BMC Psychology
Child maltreatment
Peer victimization
Attention
Attentional bias
Attentional avoidance
title Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
title_full Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
title_fullStr Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
title_full_unstemmed Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
title_short Attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
title_sort attentional avoidance in peer victimized individuals with and without psychiatric disorders
topic Child maltreatment
Peer victimization
Attention
Attentional bias
Attentional avoidance
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-019-0284-1
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminiffland attentionalavoidanceinpeervictimizedindividualswithandwithoutpsychiatricdisorders
AT angelinaweitkamper attentionalavoidanceinpeervictimizedindividualswithandwithoutpsychiatricdisorders
AT nicolaijweitkamper attentionalavoidanceinpeervictimizedindividualswithandwithoutpsychiatricdisorders
AT frankneuner attentionalavoidanceinpeervictimizedindividualswithandwithoutpsychiatricdisorders