Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network

This study evaluated some physical properties of three-leaved yam starch (TLYS). The angle of repose (AOR) (wood and glass), bulk density, true density, bulk volume, and surface area were analyzed with varying temperatures (60 °C, 67.5 °C, and 75 °C) at a constant air velocity (1.75 m/s), as tempera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenechi Nwosu-Obieogu, Emmanuel Oke, Ude Chiamaka, Dirioha Cyprian, Maureen Allen, Simeon Bright, Gabriel Ohabuike, Christian Goodnews, Ekeoma Nwankwo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323002533
_version_ 1797385121875099648
author Kenechi Nwosu-Obieogu
Emmanuel Oke
Ude Chiamaka
Dirioha Cyprian
Maureen Allen
Simeon Bright
Gabriel Ohabuike
Christian Goodnews
Ekeoma Nwankwo
author_facet Kenechi Nwosu-Obieogu
Emmanuel Oke
Ude Chiamaka
Dirioha Cyprian
Maureen Allen
Simeon Bright
Gabriel Ohabuike
Christian Goodnews
Ekeoma Nwankwo
author_sort Kenechi Nwosu-Obieogu
collection DOAJ
description This study evaluated some physical properties of three-leaved yam starch (TLYS). The angle of repose (AOR) (wood and glass), bulk density, true density, bulk volume, and surface area were analyzed with varying temperatures (60 °C, 67.5 °C, and 75 °C) at a constant air velocity (1.75 m/s), as temperature increased, the AOR glass decreased significantly. In contrast, the AOR metal increased, the highest bulk density (0.61 kg/m3) was observed at 75 °C, bulk volume and bulk density decreased significantly with an increase in temperature, and surface area increased with an increase in temperature. The effect of the operating parameters (time, temperature, and air velocity) on the responses (bulk density, true density, bulk volume, and surface area) was investigated, modeled, and optimized via Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed a second-order polynomial model with bulk density (R2- 0.999, Adj R2-0.9997, Pred R2-0.9979), true density (R2- 0.999, Adj R2-0.9997, Pred R2-0.9977), bulk volume (R2- 0.9970, Adj R2-0.9932, Pred R2-0.9527) and surface area (R2- 0.9953, Adj R2-0.9892, Pred R2-0.9247) indicating a close relationship between the experimental and predicted responses. The 3D graphs showed a significant impact of the process factors on the response. The optimal bulk density (0.81 kg/m3), true density (0.55 kg/m3), bulk volume (25 m3), and surface area (684 m2) were obtained at a temperature (57.5 °C), time (3 h), and air velocity (2.25 m/s). Artificial Neural Network (ANN) technique with 3 backpropagation algorithm (B·P.) algorithm was employed to analyze TLYS engineering properties; each algorithm was evaluated with 3 neurons in the input layer, 10 neurons in the hidden layer, and an output layer with four neurons. Coefficient of determination (R2) and mean square error (M.S.E.) have been implemented and correlated to test the adequacy of the model. Results showed that the Bayesian regularization had the best prediction for all the algorithms with an MSE (2.5465E-9) and R2 (9.999E-1) for the responses. Scanning Electron Micrograph (SEM) and proximate analysis indicate that the TLYS contains starch. This information from this study can be effectively utilized in the design parameters of the TLYS post-harvest process/machinery. Hence the post-harvest process evaluates the nutritional quality, protects food safety, and reduces losses between harvest and consumption.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:49:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f360dae1aec146478d4b9a3ed945ca0e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-1543
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:49:35Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
spelling doaj.art-f360dae1aec146478d4b9a3ed945ca0e2023-12-20T07:37:14ZengElsevierJournal of Agriculture and Food Research2666-15432023-12-0114100746Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network networkKenechi Nwosu-Obieogu0Emmanuel Oke1Ude Chiamaka2Dirioha Cyprian3Maureen Allen4Simeon Bright5Gabriel Ohabuike6Christian Goodnews7Ekeoma Nwankwo8Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria; Corresponding author.Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Michael, Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, NigeriaThis study evaluated some physical properties of three-leaved yam starch (TLYS). The angle of repose (AOR) (wood and glass), bulk density, true density, bulk volume, and surface area were analyzed with varying temperatures (60 °C, 67.5 °C, and 75 °C) at a constant air velocity (1.75 m/s), as temperature increased, the AOR glass decreased significantly. In contrast, the AOR metal increased, the highest bulk density (0.61 kg/m3) was observed at 75 °C, bulk volume and bulk density decreased significantly with an increase in temperature, and surface area increased with an increase in temperature. The effect of the operating parameters (time, temperature, and air velocity) on the responses (bulk density, true density, bulk volume, and surface area) was investigated, modeled, and optimized via Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed a second-order polynomial model with bulk density (R2- 0.999, Adj R2-0.9997, Pred R2-0.9979), true density (R2- 0.999, Adj R2-0.9997, Pred R2-0.9977), bulk volume (R2- 0.9970, Adj R2-0.9932, Pred R2-0.9527) and surface area (R2- 0.9953, Adj R2-0.9892, Pred R2-0.9247) indicating a close relationship between the experimental and predicted responses. The 3D graphs showed a significant impact of the process factors on the response. The optimal bulk density (0.81 kg/m3), true density (0.55 kg/m3), bulk volume (25 m3), and surface area (684 m2) were obtained at a temperature (57.5 °C), time (3 h), and air velocity (2.25 m/s). Artificial Neural Network (ANN) technique with 3 backpropagation algorithm (B·P.) algorithm was employed to analyze TLYS engineering properties; each algorithm was evaluated with 3 neurons in the input layer, 10 neurons in the hidden layer, and an output layer with four neurons. Coefficient of determination (R2) and mean square error (M.S.E.) have been implemented and correlated to test the adequacy of the model. Results showed that the Bayesian regularization had the best prediction for all the algorithms with an MSE (2.5465E-9) and R2 (9.999E-1) for the responses. Scanning Electron Micrograph (SEM) and proximate analysis indicate that the TLYS contains starch. This information from this study can be effectively utilized in the design parameters of the TLYS post-harvest process/machinery. Hence the post-harvest process evaluates the nutritional quality, protects food safety, and reduces losses between harvest and consumption.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323002533ANNEngineering propertiesRSMTLYS starch
spellingShingle Kenechi Nwosu-Obieogu
Emmanuel Oke
Ude Chiamaka
Dirioha Cyprian
Maureen Allen
Simeon Bright
Gabriel Ohabuike
Christian Goodnews
Ekeoma Nwankwo
Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
ANN
Engineering properties
RSM
TLYS starch
title Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network
title_full Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network
title_fullStr Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network
title_full_unstemmed Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network
title_short Three leaved yam starch physical / engineering properties evaluation using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network network
title_sort three leaved yam starch physical engineering properties evaluation using response surface methodology and artificial neural network network
topic ANN
Engineering properties
RSM
TLYS starch
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154323002533
work_keys_str_mv AT kenechinwosuobieogu threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT emmanueloke threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT udechiamaka threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT diriohacyprian threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT maureenallen threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT simeonbright threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT gabrielohabuike threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT christiangoodnews threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork
AT ekeomanwankwo threeleavedyamstarchphysicalengineeringpropertiesevaluationusingresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworknetwork