Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet

There is limited scientific evidence on the real impact of selective breeding in aquaculture on the medium term, while the composition of aquafeeds is rapidly evolving towards plant-based raw materials. We compared a rainbow trout line selected in freshwater for fillet production (improved growth, c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Vandeputte, Geneviève Corraze, Jérôme Doerflinger, Florian Enez, Frédéric Clota, Frédéric Terrier, Mathilde Horat, Laurence Larroquet, Vincent Petit, Pierrick Haffray, Sandrine Skiba-Cassy, Mathilde Dupont-Nivet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:Aquaculture Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513422003593
_version_ 1811314766425096192
author Marc Vandeputte
Geneviève Corraze
Jérôme Doerflinger
Florian Enez
Frédéric Clota
Frédéric Terrier
Mathilde Horat
Laurence Larroquet
Vincent Petit
Pierrick Haffray
Sandrine Skiba-Cassy
Mathilde Dupont-Nivet
author_facet Marc Vandeputte
Geneviève Corraze
Jérôme Doerflinger
Florian Enez
Frédéric Clota
Frédéric Terrier
Mathilde Horat
Laurence Larroquet
Vincent Petit
Pierrick Haffray
Sandrine Skiba-Cassy
Mathilde Dupont-Nivet
author_sort Marc Vandeputte
collection DOAJ
description There is limited scientific evidence on the real impact of selective breeding in aquaculture on the medium term, while the composition of aquafeeds is rapidly evolving towards plant-based raw materials. We compared a rainbow trout line selected in freshwater for fillet production (improved growth, carcass yield and fillet fat) for ten generations (G10) with an unselected control line from the same base population (G0). We crossed G10 and G0 neomales to the same G10 females, thus creating a Selected and a Control group expected to diverge by half the true difference between G0 and G10. Those were grown to 1.6 kg, and two feeds were compared across the two lines from 264 to 374 days post-hatching. One was a commercial standard, the second was a “future” feed devoid of fishmeal, fish oil and soy-based products, with microalgae as a source of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). After doubling the difference between the Selected and the Control to estimate the true performance of G0, we saw that G10 was improved relative to G0 for body weight (+61%), feed conversion ratio (−17 to −20%), fillet fat (+28–53%) and carcass yield (+4.2%), but not for fillet yield. Survival was not affected by selection. Both feeds had a similar performance in terms of growth, but the future feed showed a higher FCR, probably due to a feed intake measurement issue. Fish had a good EPA+DHA content (>1.2 g/100 g wet weight) with both feeds, partly linked to endogenous synthesis of these fatty acids. There was little if any genotype by feed interaction. This study shows that selective breeding can produce fast growing, feed efficient and thus provide opportunity for more sustainable fish culture. We showed that highly nutritious fish can be produced with good growth performance without using any fish meal, fish oil or soy-based product.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:17:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3699ec80dca436cb050c5e63274c81f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-5134
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:17:09Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Aquaculture Reports
spelling doaj.art-f3699ec80dca436cb050c5e63274c81f2022-12-22T02:48:56ZengElsevierAquaculture Reports2352-51342022-12-0127101363Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free dietMarc Vandeputte0Geneviève Corraze1Jérôme Doerflinger2Florian Enez3Frédéric Clota4Frédéric Terrier5Mathilde Horat6Laurence Larroquet7Vincent Petit8Pierrick Haffray9Sandrine Skiba-Cassy10Mathilde Dupont-Nivet11MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, INRAE, Palavas-Les-Flots, France; Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Corresponding author at: MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, INRAE, Palavas-Les-Flots, France.INRAE, Univ. Pau & Pays Adour, E2S UPPA, NUMEA, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, FranceLes Sources de l’Avance, Pissos, FranceSYSAAF, Station LPGP-INRAE, Rennes, FranceMARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, INRAE, Palavas-Les-Flots, France; Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, FranceINRAE, Univ. Pau & Pays Adour, E2S UPPA, NUMEA, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, FranceLes Sources de l’Avance, Pissos, FranceINRAE, Univ. Pau & Pays Adour, E2S UPPA, NUMEA, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, FranceLes Sources de l’Avance, Pissos, FranceSYSAAF, Station LPGP-INRAE, Rennes, FranceINRAE, Univ. Pau & Pays Adour, E2S UPPA, NUMEA, Saint-Pée-sur-Nivelle, FranceUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, FranceThere is limited scientific evidence on the real impact of selective breeding in aquaculture on the medium term, while the composition of aquafeeds is rapidly evolving towards plant-based raw materials. We compared a rainbow trout line selected in freshwater for fillet production (improved growth, carcass yield and fillet fat) for ten generations (G10) with an unselected control line from the same base population (G0). We crossed G10 and G0 neomales to the same G10 females, thus creating a Selected and a Control group expected to diverge by half the true difference between G0 and G10. Those were grown to 1.6 kg, and two feeds were compared across the two lines from 264 to 374 days post-hatching. One was a commercial standard, the second was a “future” feed devoid of fishmeal, fish oil and soy-based products, with microalgae as a source of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). After doubling the difference between the Selected and the Control to estimate the true performance of G0, we saw that G10 was improved relative to G0 for body weight (+61%), feed conversion ratio (−17 to −20%), fillet fat (+28–53%) and carcass yield (+4.2%), but not for fillet yield. Survival was not affected by selection. Both feeds had a similar performance in terms of growth, but the future feed showed a higher FCR, probably due to a feed intake measurement issue. Fish had a good EPA+DHA content (>1.2 g/100 g wet weight) with both feeds, partly linked to endogenous synthesis of these fatty acids. There was little if any genotype by feed interaction. This study shows that selective breeding can produce fast growing, feed efficient and thus provide opportunity for more sustainable fish culture. We showed that highly nutritious fish can be produced with good growth performance without using any fish meal, fish oil or soy-based product.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513422003593Selective breedingSelection responseRainbow troutGenotype by feed interaction
spellingShingle Marc Vandeputte
Geneviève Corraze
Jérôme Doerflinger
Florian Enez
Frédéric Clota
Frédéric Terrier
Mathilde Horat
Laurence Larroquet
Vincent Petit
Pierrick Haffray
Sandrine Skiba-Cassy
Mathilde Dupont-Nivet
Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet
Aquaculture Reports
Selective breeding
Selection response
Rainbow trout
Genotype by feed interaction
title Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet
title_full Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet
title_fullStr Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet
title_full_unstemmed Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet
title_short Realised genetic gains on growth, survival, feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi-trait selection in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, fed a standard diet or a “future” fish-free and soy-free diet
title_sort realised genetic gains on growth survival feed conversion ratio and quality traits after ten generations of multi trait selection in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss fed a standard diet or a future fish free and soy free diet
topic Selective breeding
Selection response
Rainbow trout
Genotype by feed interaction
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513422003593
work_keys_str_mv AT marcvandeputte realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT genevievecorraze realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT jeromedoerflinger realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT florianenez realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT fredericclota realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT fredericterrier realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT mathildehorat realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT laurencelarroquet realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT vincentpetit realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT pierrickhaffray realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT sandrineskibacassy realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet
AT mathildedupontnivet realisedgeneticgainsongrowthsurvivalfeedconversionratioandqualitytraitsaftertengenerationsofmultitraitselectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykissfedastandarddietorafuturefishfreeandsoyfreediet