Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study

Abstract Background Anatomical textbooks mention that the contact between the pterygoid process and the palatine’s pyramidal process is not a “suture” but “conjugation.”.The aim was to evaluate the maxillofacial morphological factor responding most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment, u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takashi S. Kajii, Yui Sakaguchi, Yoshihiko Sawa, Sachio Tamaoki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-01-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0254-9
_version_ 1818037441195409408
author Takashi S. Kajii
Yui Sakaguchi
Yoshihiko Sawa
Sachio Tamaoki
author_facet Takashi S. Kajii
Yui Sakaguchi
Yoshihiko Sawa
Sachio Tamaoki
author_sort Takashi S. Kajii
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Anatomical textbooks mention that the contact between the pterygoid process and the palatine’s pyramidal process is not a “suture” but “conjugation.”.The aim was to evaluate the maxillofacial morphological factor responding most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment, using the structural superimposition analysis. Methods Thirty-one girls with Angle Class III malocclusion treated using a facial mask (FM group) and 11 girls with pseudo-Class III malocclusion (pseudo-III group) were examined. Lateral cephalograms at pre- and posttreatment were analyzed to evaluate maxillofacial changes. Cephalometric structural superimposition analysis originating with Björk and Skieller was also performed. Results In the FM group, a multiple linear regression model showed that maxillary sutural growth was significantly associated with counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and treatment changes in the anteroposterior distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus, not changes in the distance from the nasion to the maxillary anterior alveolus. Conclusions Structural superimposition analysis showed that counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and changes in the distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus responded most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment. The analysis implicated that the pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation responds most to facial mask treatment among maxillofacial sutures and conjugation, and that the difference in the response induces maxillary counter-clockwise rotation.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T07:26:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f38b395853734011a42dc7b025b283f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-1042
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T07:26:53Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Progress in Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-f38b395853734011a42dc7b025b283f82022-12-22T01:57:41ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422019-01-012011710.1186/s40510-018-0254-9Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition studyTakashi S. Kajii0Yui Sakaguchi1Yoshihiko Sawa2Sachio Tamaoki3Section of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Fukuoka Dental CollegeSection of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Fukuoka Dental CollegeDepartment of Oral Function & Anatomy, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesSection of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Fukuoka Dental CollegeAbstract Background Anatomical textbooks mention that the contact between the pterygoid process and the palatine’s pyramidal process is not a “suture” but “conjugation.”.The aim was to evaluate the maxillofacial morphological factor responding most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment, using the structural superimposition analysis. Methods Thirty-one girls with Angle Class III malocclusion treated using a facial mask (FM group) and 11 girls with pseudo-Class III malocclusion (pseudo-III group) were examined. Lateral cephalograms at pre- and posttreatment were analyzed to evaluate maxillofacial changes. Cephalometric structural superimposition analysis originating with Björk and Skieller was also performed. Results In the FM group, a multiple linear regression model showed that maxillary sutural growth was significantly associated with counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and treatment changes in the anteroposterior distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus, not changes in the distance from the nasion to the maxillary anterior alveolus. Conclusions Structural superimposition analysis showed that counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and changes in the distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus responded most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment. The analysis implicated that the pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation responds most to facial mask treatment among maxillofacial sutures and conjugation, and that the difference in the response induces maxillary counter-clockwise rotation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0254-9OrthodonticsOrthopedic forceFacial maskMaxillofacial suturesPterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation
spellingShingle Takashi S. Kajii
Yui Sakaguchi
Yoshihiko Sawa
Sachio Tamaoki
Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
Progress in Orthodontics
Orthodontics
Orthopedic force
Facial mask
Maxillofacial sutures
Pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation
title Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
title_full Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
title_fullStr Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
title_full_unstemmed Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
title_short Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
title_sort maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment a structural superimposition study
topic Orthodontics
Orthopedic force
Facial mask
Maxillofacial sutures
Pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0254-9
work_keys_str_mv AT takashiskajii maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy
AT yuisakaguchi maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy
AT yoshihikosawa maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy
AT sachiotamaoki maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy