Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study
Abstract Background Anatomical textbooks mention that the contact between the pterygoid process and the palatine’s pyramidal process is not a “suture” but “conjugation.”.The aim was to evaluate the maxillofacial morphological factor responding most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment, u...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Progress in Orthodontics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0254-9 |
_version_ | 1818037441195409408 |
---|---|
author | Takashi S. Kajii Yui Sakaguchi Yoshihiko Sawa Sachio Tamaoki |
author_facet | Takashi S. Kajii Yui Sakaguchi Yoshihiko Sawa Sachio Tamaoki |
author_sort | Takashi S. Kajii |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Anatomical textbooks mention that the contact between the pterygoid process and the palatine’s pyramidal process is not a “suture” but “conjugation.”.The aim was to evaluate the maxillofacial morphological factor responding most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment, using the structural superimposition analysis. Methods Thirty-one girls with Angle Class III malocclusion treated using a facial mask (FM group) and 11 girls with pseudo-Class III malocclusion (pseudo-III group) were examined. Lateral cephalograms at pre- and posttreatment were analyzed to evaluate maxillofacial changes. Cephalometric structural superimposition analysis originating with Björk and Skieller was also performed. Results In the FM group, a multiple linear regression model showed that maxillary sutural growth was significantly associated with counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and treatment changes in the anteroposterior distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus, not changes in the distance from the nasion to the maxillary anterior alveolus. Conclusions Structural superimposition analysis showed that counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and changes in the distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus responded most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment. The analysis implicated that the pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation responds most to facial mask treatment among maxillofacial sutures and conjugation, and that the difference in the response induces maxillary counter-clockwise rotation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T07:26:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f38b395853734011a42dc7b025b283f8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2196-1042 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T07:26:53Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | Progress in Orthodontics |
spelling | doaj.art-f38b395853734011a42dc7b025b283f82022-12-22T01:57:41ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422019-01-012011710.1186/s40510-018-0254-9Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition studyTakashi S. Kajii0Yui Sakaguchi1Yoshihiko Sawa2Sachio Tamaoki3Section of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Fukuoka Dental CollegeSection of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Fukuoka Dental CollegeDepartment of Oral Function & Anatomy, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesSection of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Fukuoka Dental CollegeAbstract Background Anatomical textbooks mention that the contact between the pterygoid process and the palatine’s pyramidal process is not a “suture” but “conjugation.”.The aim was to evaluate the maxillofacial morphological factor responding most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment, using the structural superimposition analysis. Methods Thirty-one girls with Angle Class III malocclusion treated using a facial mask (FM group) and 11 girls with pseudo-Class III malocclusion (pseudo-III group) were examined. Lateral cephalograms at pre- and posttreatment were analyzed to evaluate maxillofacial changes. Cephalometric structural superimposition analysis originating with Björk and Skieller was also performed. Results In the FM group, a multiple linear regression model showed that maxillary sutural growth was significantly associated with counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and treatment changes in the anteroposterior distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus, not changes in the distance from the nasion to the maxillary anterior alveolus. Conclusions Structural superimposition analysis showed that counter-clockwise rotation of the maxilla and changes in the distance from the pterygomaxillary fissure to the maxillary anterior alveolus responded most to the orthopedic force of facial mask treatment. The analysis implicated that the pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation responds most to facial mask treatment among maxillofacial sutures and conjugation, and that the difference in the response induces maxillary counter-clockwise rotation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0254-9OrthodonticsOrthopedic forceFacial maskMaxillofacial suturesPterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation |
spellingShingle | Takashi S. Kajii Yui Sakaguchi Yoshihiko Sawa Sachio Tamaoki Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study Progress in Orthodontics Orthodontics Orthopedic force Facial mask Maxillofacial sutures Pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation |
title | Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study |
title_full | Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study |
title_fullStr | Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study |
title_full_unstemmed | Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study |
title_short | Maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment: a structural superimposition study |
title_sort | maxillofacial morphological factors related to acceleration of maxillary growth attributed to facial mask treatment a structural superimposition study |
topic | Orthodontics Orthopedic force Facial mask Maxillofacial sutures Pterygoid fissure–palatine’s pyramidal process conjugation |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0254-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takashiskajii maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy AT yuisakaguchi maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy AT yoshihikosawa maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy AT sachiotamaoki maxillofacialmorphologicalfactorsrelatedtoaccelerationofmaxillarygrowthattributedtofacialmasktreatmentastructuralsuperimpositionstudy |