THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED
The present research aims to address the system of judicial precedents and its applicability in the judicial system and its effectiveness in a judicial decision, with the light of the analysis of legal reasoning. In the current times the stare decisis has been introduced gradually in the system of c...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/29288/22425 |
_version_ | 1818441096484618240 |
---|---|
author | Gisele Beltrami Marcato Lucas Del Mora |
author_facet | Gisele Beltrami Marcato Lucas Del Mora |
author_sort | Gisele Beltrami Marcato |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The present research aims to address the system of judicial precedents and its applicability in the judicial system and its effectiveness in a judicial decision, with the light of the analysis of legal reasoning. In the current times the stare decisis has been introduced gradually in the system of civil procedures, it gives by approximation of the tradition common law to civil law . It is a doctrine with nuances that require the operator to some techniques needed for your application. Then, more and more importance has been added in this judicial precedents, but must be care to handle it, cos it can't be ignored the facts around it : The fundamental rights, constitutional norms and the Rule of Law and the arbitrariness of the state, for both will expose some controversial points of the theory of precedent as a trend of procedure, in addition to focusing on the analysis of the judicial decision as a product of a rational process and its relationship with the system of precedents. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T18:22:49Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f3ab7e6cf37b49c39a9b189e72e3723f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1982-7636 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T18:22:49Z |
publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
publisher | Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
spelling | doaj.art-f3ab7e6cf37b49c39a9b189e72e3723f2022-12-21T22:52:01ZengUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRevista Eletrônica de Direito Processual1982-76362017-12-01183146174https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2017.29288THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGEDGisele Beltrami Marcato0Lucas Del Mora1Centro Universitário “Antônio Eufrásio de Toledo” de Presidente Prudente – SPDefensoria Pública do Estado de São PauloThe present research aims to address the system of judicial precedents and its applicability in the judicial system and its effectiveness in a judicial decision, with the light of the analysis of legal reasoning. In the current times the stare decisis has been introduced gradually in the system of civil procedures, it gives by approximation of the tradition common law to civil law . It is a doctrine with nuances that require the operator to some techniques needed for your application. Then, more and more importance has been added in this judicial precedents, but must be care to handle it, cos it can't be ignored the facts around it : The fundamental rights, constitutional norms and the Rule of Law and the arbitrariness of the state, for both will expose some controversial points of the theory of precedent as a trend of procedure, in addition to focusing on the analysis of the judicial decision as a product of a rational process and its relationship with the system of precedents.https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/29288/22425judicial decisionprecedentslegal argumentationgrounds for decision |
spellingShingle | Gisele Beltrami Marcato Lucas Del Mora THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual judicial decision precedents legal argumentation grounds for decision |
title | THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED |
title_full | THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED |
title_fullStr | THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED |
title_full_unstemmed | THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED |
title_short | THE SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS: CONTROVERTED ASPECTS OF ITS APPLICATION IN THE CURRENT CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AND THE RATIONALITY CHANGE IN THE USE OF JUDGED |
title_sort | system of judicial precedents controverted aspects of its application in the current civil procedure code and the rationality change in the use of judged |
topic | judicial decision precedents legal argumentation grounds for decision |
url | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/article/view/29288/22425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giselebeltramimarcato thesystemofjudicialprecedentscontrovertedaspectsofitsapplicationinthecurrentcivilprocedurecodeandtherationalitychangeintheuseofjudged AT lucasdelmora thesystemofjudicialprecedentscontrovertedaspectsofitsapplicationinthecurrentcivilprocedurecodeandtherationalitychangeintheuseofjudged AT giselebeltramimarcato systemofjudicialprecedentscontrovertedaspectsofitsapplicationinthecurrentcivilprocedurecodeandtherationalitychangeintheuseofjudged AT lucasdelmora systemofjudicialprecedentscontrovertedaspectsofitsapplicationinthecurrentcivilprocedurecodeandtherationalitychangeintheuseofjudged |