Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Abstract Objectives To investigate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐determined cervical lymph node (CLN) size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 2066 patients with NPC treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy, and randomly divided them...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng‐Long Huang, Yang Chen, Rui Guo, Yan‐Ping Mao, Cheng Xu, Li Tian, Li‐Zhi Liu, Ai‐Hua Lin, Ying Sun, Jun Ma, Ling‐long Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3392
_version_ 1797839430327730176
author Cheng‐Long Huang
Yang Chen
Rui Guo
Yan‐Ping Mao
Cheng Xu
Li Tian
Li‐Zhi Liu
Ai‐Hua Lin
Ying Sun
Jun Ma
Ling‐long Tang
author_facet Cheng‐Long Huang
Yang Chen
Rui Guo
Yan‐Ping Mao
Cheng Xu
Li Tian
Li‐Zhi Liu
Ai‐Hua Lin
Ying Sun
Jun Ma
Ling‐long Tang
author_sort Cheng‐Long Huang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To investigate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐determined cervical lymph node (CLN) size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 2066 patients with NPC treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy, and randomly divided them into two groups, in a 1:1 ratio. One group was used for training (the training group), and the other one was for internal validation (the validation group). All patients had undergone MRI examination and the maximal axial diameters (MAD) of the axial plane of all positive nodes had been measured and recorded. Results Of 683 patients with CLN metastases in the training group (n = 1033), MAD = 4 cm was associated with worse OS (64.7% vs 84.6%, P < .001), DFS (55.9% vs 76.3%, P = .001), and DMFS (67.6% vs 86.1%, P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that MAD = 4 cm was a significant negative prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.058; P = .025), DFS (HR = 1.727; P = .049), and DMFS (HR = 2.034; P = .036). When MRI‐determined MAD = 4 cm was classified as N3 in the N classification, the OS, DFS, DMFS, and RRFS survival curves were well separated. The OS, DFS, DMFS, and RRFS concordance indexes were not statistically different between the proposed N staging system and the UICC/AJCC staging system in the training group, or between the training group and the validation group (all P = .05). Conclusion MAD = 4 cm on axial MRI slices can be recommended as a prognostic factor in future versions of the UICC/AJCC NPC staging system.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:57:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3ad6a18fba448da943645b4a02e8e53
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:57:52Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-f3ad6a18fba448da943645b4a02e8e532023-04-25T14:00:49ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342020-10-019197100710610.1002/cam4.3392Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinomaCheng‐Long Huang0Yang Chen1Rui Guo2Yan‐Ping Mao3Cheng Xu4Li Tian5Li‐Zhi Liu6Ai‐Hua Lin7Ying Sun8Jun Ma9Ling‐long Tang10Department of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaImaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaImaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology School of Public HealthSun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou ChinaAbstract Objectives To investigate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐determined cervical lymph node (CLN) size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 2066 patients with NPC treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy, and randomly divided them into two groups, in a 1:1 ratio. One group was used for training (the training group), and the other one was for internal validation (the validation group). All patients had undergone MRI examination and the maximal axial diameters (MAD) of the axial plane of all positive nodes had been measured and recorded. Results Of 683 patients with CLN metastases in the training group (n = 1033), MAD = 4 cm was associated with worse OS (64.7% vs 84.6%, P < .001), DFS (55.9% vs 76.3%, P = .001), and DMFS (67.6% vs 86.1%, P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that MAD = 4 cm was a significant negative prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.058; P = .025), DFS (HR = 1.727; P = .049), and DMFS (HR = 2.034; P = .036). When MRI‐determined MAD = 4 cm was classified as N3 in the N classification, the OS, DFS, DMFS, and RRFS survival curves were well separated. The OS, DFS, DMFS, and RRFS concordance indexes were not statistically different between the proposed N staging system and the UICC/AJCC staging system in the training group, or between the training group and the validation group (all P = .05). Conclusion MAD = 4 cm on axial MRI slices can be recommended as a prognostic factor in future versions of the UICC/AJCC NPC staging system.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3392lymph nodemagnetic resonanceN staging systemnasopharyngeal carcinomaprognosis
spellingShingle Cheng‐Long Huang
Yang Chen
Rui Guo
Yan‐Ping Mao
Cheng Xu
Li Tian
Li‐Zhi Liu
Ai‐Hua Lin
Ying Sun
Jun Ma
Ling‐long Tang
Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Cancer Medicine
lymph node
magnetic resonance
N staging system
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
prognosis
title Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_full Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_short Prognostic value of MRI‐determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
title_sort prognostic value of mri determined cervical lymph node size in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
topic lymph node
magnetic resonance
N staging system
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3392
work_keys_str_mv AT chenglonghuang prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT yangchen prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT ruiguo prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT yanpingmao prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT chengxu prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT litian prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT lizhiliu prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT aihualin prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT yingsun prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT junma prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT linglongtang prognosticvalueofmrideterminedcervicallymphnodesizeinnasopharyngealcarcinoma