Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study

Study Design: This was an interventional human cadaver study and radiological study. Objectives: Atlas instrumentation is frequently involved in fusion procedures involving the craniocervical junction area. Identification of the entry point at the center of atlas lateral mass (ALM) is challenging be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amro F Al-Habib, Abdulkarim Al-Rabie, Sami Aleissa, Abdulrahman Albakr, Abdulaziz Abobotain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Al-Habib
_version_ 1818274153109651456
author Amro F Al-Habib
Abdulkarim Al-Rabie
Sami Aleissa
Abdulrahman Albakr
Abdulaziz Abobotain
author_facet Amro F Al-Habib
Abdulkarim Al-Rabie
Sami Aleissa
Abdulrahman Albakr
Abdulaziz Abobotain
author_sort Amro F Al-Habib
collection DOAJ
description Study Design: This was an interventional human cadaver study and radiological study. Objectives: Atlas instrumentation is frequently involved in fusion procedures involving the craniocervical junction area. Identification of the entry point at the center of atlas lateral mass (ALM) is challenging because of its rounded posterior surface and the surrounding venous plexus. This report examines using the medial edge of atlas posterior arch (MEC1) as a fixed and reliable anatomic reference to guide the entry point of ALM screws. Methods: Fifty, normal, cervical spine computed tomography studies were reviewed. ALM screw trajectories were planned at one point along MEC1 and another point 2 mm lateral to MEC1. Free-hand ALM instrumentation was performed in ten fresh human cadavers using the 2 mm entry point, with a sagittal trajectory parallel to atlas inferior arch (IAC1); three-dimensional imaging was then performed to confirm instrumentation accuracy. Results: The average ALM diameter was 12.35 mm. Inserting a screw using the entry point 2 mm lateral to MEC1 was closer to ALM midpoint than using the entry point along MEC1 (P < 0.0001). Twenty ALM screws were successfully inserted in the ten cadavers. No encroachments into the spinal canal or foramen transversarium occurred. However, two screws were superiorly directed and violated the occipitocervical joint; they were not parallel to IAC1. Conclusion: MEC1 provides a fixed and reliable landmark for ALM instrumentation. An entry point 2 mm point lateral to MEC1 is close to ALM midpoint. IAC1 also provides a guide for the sagittal trajectory. Attention to anatomic landmarks may help reduce complications associated with atlas instrumentation but should be verified in future clinical studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:09:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3be49adf419425ab04c3ccf08449894
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-8237
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:09:19Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
spelling doaj.art-f3be49adf419425ab04c3ccf084498942022-12-22T00:10:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372017-01-01829710210.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_36_17Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic studyAmro F Al-HabibAbdulkarim Al-RabieSami AleissaAbdulrahman AlbakrAbdulaziz AbobotainStudy Design: This was an interventional human cadaver study and radiological study. Objectives: Atlas instrumentation is frequently involved in fusion procedures involving the craniocervical junction area. Identification of the entry point at the center of atlas lateral mass (ALM) is challenging because of its rounded posterior surface and the surrounding venous plexus. This report examines using the medial edge of atlas posterior arch (MEC1) as a fixed and reliable anatomic reference to guide the entry point of ALM screws. Methods: Fifty, normal, cervical spine computed tomography studies were reviewed. ALM screw trajectories were planned at one point along MEC1 and another point 2 mm lateral to MEC1. Free-hand ALM instrumentation was performed in ten fresh human cadavers using the 2 mm entry point, with a sagittal trajectory parallel to atlas inferior arch (IAC1); three-dimensional imaging was then performed to confirm instrumentation accuracy. Results: The average ALM diameter was 12.35 mm. Inserting a screw using the entry point 2 mm lateral to MEC1 was closer to ALM midpoint than using the entry point along MEC1 (P < 0.0001). Twenty ALM screws were successfully inserted in the ten cadavers. No encroachments into the spinal canal or foramen transversarium occurred. However, two screws were superiorly directed and violated the occipitocervical joint; they were not parallel to IAC1. Conclusion: MEC1 provides a fixed and reliable landmark for ALM instrumentation. An entry point 2 mm point lateral to MEC1 is close to ALM midpoint. IAC1 also provides a guide for the sagittal trajectory. Attention to anatomic landmarks may help reduce complications associated with atlas instrumentation but should be verified in future clinical studies.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Al-HabibAtlantoaxial instrumentationatlas instrumentationatlas lateral massatlas medial archC1 inferior arch bordercraniocervical instrumentation
spellingShingle Amro F Al-Habib
Abdulkarim Al-Rabie
Sami Aleissa
Abdulrahman Albakr
Abdulaziz Abobotain
Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Atlantoaxial instrumentation
atlas instrumentation
atlas lateral mass
atlas medial arch
C1 inferior arch border
craniocervical instrumentation
title Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study
title_full Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study
title_fullStr Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study
title_full_unstemmed Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study
title_short Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study
title_sort atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch an anatomic and radiologic study
topic Atlantoaxial instrumentation
atlas instrumentation
atlas lateral mass
atlas medial arch
C1 inferior arch border
craniocervical instrumentation
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2017;volume=8;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Al-Habib
work_keys_str_mv AT amrofalhabib atlasinstrumentationguidedbythemedialedgeoftheposteriorarchananatomicandradiologicstudy
AT abdulkarimalrabie atlasinstrumentationguidedbythemedialedgeoftheposteriorarchananatomicandradiologicstudy
AT samialeissa atlasinstrumentationguidedbythemedialedgeoftheposteriorarchananatomicandradiologicstudy
AT abdulrahmanalbakr atlasinstrumentationguidedbythemedialedgeoftheposteriorarchananatomicandradiologicstudy
AT abdulazizabobotain atlasinstrumentationguidedbythemedialedgeoftheposteriorarchananatomicandradiologicstudy