Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?

Value creation has become a very important concept in finance. To this end, value creation metrics, like market value added and economic value added have raised the question of their superiority and ability to reflect the true value of organizations, as opposed to the classic accounting indicators l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anouar Faiteh, Mohammed Rachid Aasri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" 2023-02-01
Series:Investment Management & Financial Innovations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/17706/IMFI_2023_01_Faiteh.pdf
_version_ 1811164956807135232
author Anouar Faiteh
Mohammed Rachid Aasri
author_facet Anouar Faiteh
Mohammed Rachid Aasri
author_sort Anouar Faiteh
collection DOAJ
description Value creation has become a very important concept in finance. To this end, value creation metrics, like market value added and economic value added have raised the question of their superiority and ability to reflect the true value of organizations, as opposed to the classic accounting indicators like ROE, ROA and EPS. Nevertheless, EVA can only be calculated for listed companies, which makes it difficult to use this indicator to measure value creation for non-listed companies. In this way, some alternatives have been used such as the accounting beta to calculate the return on equity and subsequently the determination of the EVA. Within this framework, the central point of this research is to empirically verify the idea that the normal EVA and EVA calculated using accounting beta are the better measure than traditional indicators to explain MVA. A panel of 32 companies traded on the Casablanca Stock Exchange over the period 2015–2019 was selected for this study. The regression method on panel data was used. The results show that normal EVA is a superior metric than the classical indicators to explain MVA. In addition, the EVA calculated from the accounting beta could be used as a measure adapted to the case of unlisted companies to measure value creation.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T15:29:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3ca19da1ec249aea7f1e9d418f5fffa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1810-4967
1812-9358
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T15:29:41Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
record_format Article
series Investment Management & Financial Innovations
spelling doaj.art-f3ca19da1ec249aea7f1e9d418f5fffa2023-02-14T07:00:45ZengLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"Investment Management & Financial Innovations1810-49671812-93582023-02-0120113815010.21511/imfi.20(1).2023.1317706Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?Anouar Faiteh0Mohammed Rachid Aasri1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-4641Ph.D., Faculty of Law, Economic and Social Sciences – Souissi, Research Laboratory in Economic Competitiveness and Managerial Performance, Mohammed V UniversityProfessor, Faculty of Juridical, Economic and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Economic and Social Sciences – Souissi, Research Laboratory in Economic Competitiveness and Managerial Performance, Mohammed V UniversityValue creation has become a very important concept in finance. To this end, value creation metrics, like market value added and economic value added have raised the question of their superiority and ability to reflect the true value of organizations, as opposed to the classic accounting indicators like ROE, ROA and EPS. Nevertheless, EVA can only be calculated for listed companies, which makes it difficult to use this indicator to measure value creation for non-listed companies. In this way, some alternatives have been used such as the accounting beta to calculate the return on equity and subsequently the determination of the EVA. Within this framework, the central point of this research is to empirically verify the idea that the normal EVA and EVA calculated using accounting beta are the better measure than traditional indicators to explain MVA. A panel of 32 companies traded on the Casablanca Stock Exchange over the period 2015–2019 was selected for this study. The regression method on panel data was used. The results show that normal EVA is a superior metric than the classical indicators to explain MVA. In addition, the EVA calculated from the accounting beta could be used as a measure adapted to the case of unlisted companies to measure value creation.https://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/17706/IMFI_2023_01_Faiteh.pdfaccounting betaaccounting measurescost of equityEVAmarket value added
spellingShingle Anouar Faiteh
Mohammed Rachid Aasri
Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?
Investment Management & Financial Innovations
accounting beta
accounting measures
cost of equity
EVA
market value added
title Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?
title_full Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?
title_fullStr Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?
title_full_unstemmed Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?
title_short Economic value added: The best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion?
title_sort economic value added the best indicator for measuring value creation or just an illusion
topic accounting beta
accounting measures
cost of equity
EVA
market value added
url https://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/17706/IMFI_2023_01_Faiteh.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anouarfaiteh economicvalueaddedthebestindicatorformeasuringvaluecreationorjustanillusion
AT mohammedrachidaasri economicvalueaddedthebestindicatorformeasuringvaluecreationorjustanillusion