Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses

“Locked-in” patients lose their ability to communicate naturally due to motor system dysfunction. Brain-computer interfacing offers a solution for their inability to communicate by enabling motor-independent communication. Straightforward and convenient in-session communication is essential in clini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurien Nagels-Coune, Amaia Benitez-Andonegui, Niels Reuter, Michael Lührs, Rainer Goebel, Peter De Weerd, Lars Riecke, Bettina Sorger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00113/full
_version_ 1819065418247045120
author Laurien Nagels-Coune
Laurien Nagels-Coune
Laurien Nagels-Coune
Amaia Benitez-Andonegui
Amaia Benitez-Andonegui
Niels Reuter
Niels Reuter
Michael Lührs
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd
Lars Riecke
Lars Riecke
Bettina Sorger
Bettina Sorger
author_facet Laurien Nagels-Coune
Laurien Nagels-Coune
Laurien Nagels-Coune
Amaia Benitez-Andonegui
Amaia Benitez-Andonegui
Niels Reuter
Niels Reuter
Michael Lührs
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd
Lars Riecke
Lars Riecke
Bettina Sorger
Bettina Sorger
author_sort Laurien Nagels-Coune
collection DOAJ
description “Locked-in” patients lose their ability to communicate naturally due to motor system dysfunction. Brain-computer interfacing offers a solution for their inability to communicate by enabling motor-independent communication. Straightforward and convenient in-session communication is essential in clinical environments. The present study introduces a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based binary communication paradigm that requires limited preparation time and merely nine optodes. Eighteen healthy participants performed two mental imagery tasks, mental drawing and spatial navigation, to answer yes/no questions during one of two auditorily cued time windows. Each of the six questions was answered five times, resulting in five trials per answer. This communication paradigm thus combines both spatial (two different mental imagery tasks, here mental drawing for “yes” and spatial navigation for “no”) and temporal (distinct time windows for encoding a “yes” and “no” answer) fNIRS signal features for information encoding. Participants’ answers were decoded in simulated real-time using general linear model analysis. Joint analysis of all five encoding trials resulted in an average accuracy of 66.67 and 58.33% using the oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin signal respectively. For half of the participants, an accuracy of 83.33% or higher was reached using either the HbO signal or the HbR signal. For four participants, effective communication with 100% accuracy was achieved using either the HbO or HbR signal. An explorative analysis investigated the differentiability of the two mental tasks based solely on spatial fNIRS signal features. Using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) group single-trial accuracies of 58.33% (using 20 training trials per task) and 60.56% (using 40 training trials per task) could be obtained. Combining the five trials per run using a majority voting approach heightened these MVPA accuracies to 62.04 and 75%. Additionally, an fNIRS suitability questionnaire capturing participants’ physical features was administered to explore its predictive value for evaluating general data quality. Obtained questionnaire scores correlated significantly (r = -0.499) with the signal-to-noise of the raw light intensities. While more work is needed to further increase decoding accuracy, this study shows the potential of answer encoding using spatiotemporal fNIRS signal features or spatial fNIRS signal features only.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T15:46:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3db78f1c24f4bf4a685080bea50e455
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T15:46:09Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-f3db78f1c24f4bf4a685080bea50e4552022-12-21T18:58:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612020-04-011410.3389/fnhum.2020.00113522380Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS ResponsesLaurien Nagels-Coune0Laurien Nagels-Coune1Laurien Nagels-Coune2Amaia Benitez-Andonegui3Amaia Benitez-Andonegui4Niels Reuter5Niels Reuter6Michael Lührs7Rainer Goebel8Rainer Goebel9Rainer Goebel10Peter De Weerd11Peter De Weerd12Peter De Weerd13Lars Riecke14Lars Riecke15Bettina Sorger16Bettina Sorger17Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, NetherlandsUniversity Psychiatric Centre Sint-Kamillus, Bierbeek, BelgiumDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, NetherlandsInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, GermanyBrain Innovation B.V., Maastricht, NetherlandsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, NetherlandsBrain Innovation B.V., Maastricht, NetherlandsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Centre for Systems Biology (MaCSBio), Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, NetherlandsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsMaastricht Brain Imaging Center, Maastricht, Netherlands“Locked-in” patients lose their ability to communicate naturally due to motor system dysfunction. Brain-computer interfacing offers a solution for their inability to communicate by enabling motor-independent communication. Straightforward and convenient in-session communication is essential in clinical environments. The present study introduces a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based binary communication paradigm that requires limited preparation time and merely nine optodes. Eighteen healthy participants performed two mental imagery tasks, mental drawing and spatial navigation, to answer yes/no questions during one of two auditorily cued time windows. Each of the six questions was answered five times, resulting in five trials per answer. This communication paradigm thus combines both spatial (two different mental imagery tasks, here mental drawing for “yes” and spatial navigation for “no”) and temporal (distinct time windows for encoding a “yes” and “no” answer) fNIRS signal features for information encoding. Participants’ answers were decoded in simulated real-time using general linear model analysis. Joint analysis of all five encoding trials resulted in an average accuracy of 66.67 and 58.33% using the oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin signal respectively. For half of the participants, an accuracy of 83.33% or higher was reached using either the HbO signal or the HbR signal. For four participants, effective communication with 100% accuracy was achieved using either the HbO or HbR signal. An explorative analysis investigated the differentiability of the two mental tasks based solely on spatial fNIRS signal features. Using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) group single-trial accuracies of 58.33% (using 20 training trials per task) and 60.56% (using 40 training trials per task) could be obtained. Combining the five trials per run using a majority voting approach heightened these MVPA accuracies to 62.04 and 75%. Additionally, an fNIRS suitability questionnaire capturing participants’ physical features was administered to explore its predictive value for evaluating general data quality. Obtained questionnaire scores correlated significantly (r = -0.499) with the signal-to-noise of the raw light intensities. While more work is needed to further increase decoding accuracy, this study shows the potential of answer encoding using spatiotemporal fNIRS signal features or spatial fNIRS signal features only.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00113/fullfunctional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)brain computer interfacemental imagerymental drawingmotor imageryspatial navigation
spellingShingle Laurien Nagels-Coune
Laurien Nagels-Coune
Laurien Nagels-Coune
Amaia Benitez-Andonegui
Amaia Benitez-Andonegui
Niels Reuter
Niels Reuter
Michael Lührs
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd
Lars Riecke
Lars Riecke
Bettina Sorger
Bettina Sorger
Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
brain computer interface
mental imagery
mental drawing
motor imagery
spatial navigation
title Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses
title_full Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses
title_fullStr Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses
title_full_unstemmed Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses
title_short Brain-Based Binary Communication Using Spatiotemporal Features of fNIRS Responses
title_sort brain based binary communication using spatiotemporal features of fnirs responses
topic functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
brain computer interface
mental imagery
mental drawing
motor imagery
spatial navigation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00113/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lauriennagelscoune brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT lauriennagelscoune brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT lauriennagelscoune brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT amaiabenitezandonegui brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT amaiabenitezandonegui brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT nielsreuter brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT nielsreuter brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT michaelluhrs brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT rainergoebel brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT rainergoebel brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT rainergoebel brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT peterdeweerd brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT peterdeweerd brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT peterdeweerd brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT larsriecke brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT larsriecke brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT bettinasorger brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses
AT bettinasorger brainbasedbinarycommunicationusingspatiotemporalfeaturesoffnirsresponses