A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows

ABSTRACT: The objectives were to examine the effect of an automated premilking stimulation (APS) by means of a high pulsation frequency (300 cycles/min) without a reduction of the vacuum in the pulsation chamber or claw piece on (1) milking performance, (2) teat tissue condition, and (3) udder healt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Wieland, C.M. Geary, D.V. Nydam, P.D. Virkler, M. Zurakowski, R.D. Watters, R. Lynch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Dairy Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203022300406X
_version_ 1797741479595081728
author M. Wieland
C.M. Geary
D.V. Nydam
P.D. Virkler
M. Zurakowski
R.D. Watters
R. Lynch
author_facet M. Wieland
C.M. Geary
D.V. Nydam
P.D. Virkler
M. Zurakowski
R.D. Watters
R. Lynch
author_sort M. Wieland
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: The objectives were to examine the effect of an automated premilking stimulation (APS) by means of a high pulsation frequency (300 cycles/min) without a reduction of the vacuum in the pulsation chamber or claw piece on (1) milking performance, (2) teat tissue condition, and (3) udder health in dairy cows. In a randomized controlled field study, Holstein cows (n = 427) from 1 commercial dairy farm with a milking schedule of 3 times per day were assigned to treatment and control groups over a 90-d period. Treatments consisted of a maximum of 80 s (APS80) or 99 s (APS99) of mechanical stimulation at a pulsation rate of 300 pulses per minute and a ratio of 25:75 (no reduction of the pulsation chamber or milking vacuum). Cows in the control group (CON) received traditional premilking stimulation by means of manual forestripping for 8 s. Milking characteristics were documented with on-farm milk meters. Short- and long-term changes in teat tissue condition induced by machine milking were assessed visually on a weekly basis. Composite milk samples were analyzed once per month to determine somatic cell count. Generalized linear mixed models were used to study the effect of the treatment on the outcome variables. We observed no meaningful differences in milk yield or milking unit-on time. Least squares means and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for cows in the APS80, APS99, and CON groups were 13.5 (13.1–14.0), 13.2 (12.8–13.7), and 13.2 (12.8–13.7) kg for milk yield and 222 (213–231), 219 (210–228), and 223 (214–232) s for milking unit-on time, respectively. The effect of treatment on bimodality was modified by milk yield such that the odds of bimodality increased in the treatment groups with increasing milk yield. Compared with cows in the CON group, the odds ratios (95% CI) of bimodality were 1.08 (0.62–1.89) in the APS80 group and 0.89 (0.55–1.42) in the APS99 group at a milk yield of 11 kg and 2.0 (1.24–3.22) in the APS80 group and 2.08 (1.29–3.35) in the APS99 group at a milk yield of 16 kg. We observed differences in short- and long-term changes in teat tissue condition between the treatment and control groups. Compared with cows in the CON group, the odds (95% CI) of short-term changes were 1.87 (1.35–2.58) for the APS80 group and 1.49 (1.08–2.07) for the APS99 group, and the odds of long-term changes were 1.52 (1.24–1.85) for cows in the APS80 group and 1.59 (1.31–1.94) for cows in the APS99 group. The least squares means (95% CI) for somatic cell counts (log10-transformed) were 4.74 (4.68–4.81) for the APS80 group, 4.77 (4.71–4.83) for the APS99 group, and 4.79 (4.73–4.86) for the CON group. We conclude that the APS system tested here had no negative effects on milk yield or milking unit-on time. However, differences in bimodality and teat tissue condition suggest that the APS system did not provide sufficient stimulation to facilitate a gentle milk harvest and adversely affects teat tissue condition.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:27:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f3dbafdb6304491c910ef637b5642ea3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-0302
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:27:53Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Dairy Science
spelling doaj.art-f3dbafdb6304491c910ef637b5642ea32023-08-18T04:30:27ZengElsevierJournal of Dairy Science0022-03022023-09-01106965516566A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cowsM. Wieland0C.M. Geary1D.V. Nydam2P.D. Virkler3M. Zurakowski4R.D. Watters5R. Lynch6Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; Corresponding authorDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853ABSTRACT: The objectives were to examine the effect of an automated premilking stimulation (APS) by means of a high pulsation frequency (300 cycles/min) without a reduction of the vacuum in the pulsation chamber or claw piece on (1) milking performance, (2) teat tissue condition, and (3) udder health in dairy cows. In a randomized controlled field study, Holstein cows (n = 427) from 1 commercial dairy farm with a milking schedule of 3 times per day were assigned to treatment and control groups over a 90-d period. Treatments consisted of a maximum of 80 s (APS80) or 99 s (APS99) of mechanical stimulation at a pulsation rate of 300 pulses per minute and a ratio of 25:75 (no reduction of the pulsation chamber or milking vacuum). Cows in the control group (CON) received traditional premilking stimulation by means of manual forestripping for 8 s. Milking characteristics were documented with on-farm milk meters. Short- and long-term changes in teat tissue condition induced by machine milking were assessed visually on a weekly basis. Composite milk samples were analyzed once per month to determine somatic cell count. Generalized linear mixed models were used to study the effect of the treatment on the outcome variables. We observed no meaningful differences in milk yield or milking unit-on time. Least squares means and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for cows in the APS80, APS99, and CON groups were 13.5 (13.1–14.0), 13.2 (12.8–13.7), and 13.2 (12.8–13.7) kg for milk yield and 222 (213–231), 219 (210–228), and 223 (214–232) s for milking unit-on time, respectively. The effect of treatment on bimodality was modified by milk yield such that the odds of bimodality increased in the treatment groups with increasing milk yield. Compared with cows in the CON group, the odds ratios (95% CI) of bimodality were 1.08 (0.62–1.89) in the APS80 group and 0.89 (0.55–1.42) in the APS99 group at a milk yield of 11 kg and 2.0 (1.24–3.22) in the APS80 group and 2.08 (1.29–3.35) in the APS99 group at a milk yield of 16 kg. We observed differences in short- and long-term changes in teat tissue condition between the treatment and control groups. Compared with cows in the CON group, the odds (95% CI) of short-term changes were 1.87 (1.35–2.58) for the APS80 group and 1.49 (1.08–2.07) for the APS99 group, and the odds of long-term changes were 1.52 (1.24–1.85) for cows in the APS80 group and 1.59 (1.31–1.94) for cows in the APS99 group. The least squares means (95% CI) for somatic cell counts (log10-transformed) were 4.74 (4.68–4.81) for the APS80 group, 4.77 (4.71–4.83) for the APS99 group, and 4.79 (4.73–4.86) for the CON group. We conclude that the APS system tested here had no negative effects on milk yield or milking unit-on time. However, differences in bimodality and teat tissue condition suggest that the APS system did not provide sufficient stimulation to facilitate a gentle milk harvest and adversely affects teat tissue condition.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203022300406Xbovinemilking performancebimodalityteat condition
spellingShingle M. Wieland
C.M. Geary
D.V. Nydam
P.D. Virkler
M. Zurakowski
R.D. Watters
R. Lynch
A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows
Journal of Dairy Science
bovine
milking performance
bimodality
teat condition
title A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows
title_full A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows
title_short A randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance, teat tissue condition, and udder health in Holstein dairy cows
title_sort randomized controlled trial to study the effects of an automated premilking stimulation system on milking performance teat tissue condition and udder health in holstein dairy cows
topic bovine
milking performance
bimodality
teat condition
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203022300406X
work_keys_str_mv AT mwieland arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT cmgeary arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT dvnydam arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT pdvirkler arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT mzurakowski arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT rdwatters arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT rlynch arandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT mwieland randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT cmgeary randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT dvnydam randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT pdvirkler randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT mzurakowski randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT rdwatters randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows
AT rlynch randomizedcontrolledtrialtostudytheeffectsofanautomatedpremilkingstimulationsystemonmilkingperformanceteattissueconditionandudderhealthinholsteindairycows